This commit changes the behavior of `single_match` lint.
After that, we won't lint non-exhaustive matches like this:
```rust
match Some(v) {
Some(a) => println!("${:?}", a),
None => {},
}
```
The rationale is that, because the type of `a` could be changed, so the
user can get non-exhaustive match after applying the suggested lint (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/issues/8282#issuecomment-1013566068
for context).
We also will lint `match` constructions with tuples. When we see the
tuples on the both arms, we will check them both at the same time, and
if they form exhaustive match, we could display the warning.
Closes#8282
Add `msrv` config for `map_clone`
Just a small PR to have some fun with Clippy and to clear my head a bit 😅
---
changelog: [`map_clone`]: The suggestion takes `msrv` into account
changelog: Track `msrv` attribute for `manual_bits` and `borrow_as_prt`
fixes: #8276
fix op_ref false positive
fixes#7572
changelog: `op_ref` don't lint for unnecessary reference in BinOp impl if removing the reference will lead to unconditional recursion
issue #8239: Printed hint for lint or_fun_call is cropped and does no…
fixesrust-lang/rust-clippy#8239
changelog: [`or_fun_call`]: if suggestion contains more lines than MAX_SUGGESTION_HIGHLIGHT_LINES it is stripped to one line
* Track the argument when used to initialize simple `let` bindings
* Check if the argument is passed to a function requiring the original type
* Use `multipart_suggestion` rather than multiple suggestions
* Check if the name given in the source code matches the name of the actual type
`manual_memcpy` fix
fixes#8160
Ideally this would work with `VecDeque`, but the current interface is unsuitable for it. At a minimum something like `range_as_slices` would be needed.
changelog: Don't lint `manual_memcpy` on `VecDeque`
changelog: Suggest `copy_from_slice` for `manual_memcpy` when applicable
Some test code cleanup
changelog: none
Mainly moves /clippy_workspace_tests into /tests and combines the two dogfood tests which can't run concurrently.
This pull request adds a lint against single character lifetime names, as they might not divulge enough information about the purpose of the lifetime. This can make code harder to understand. I placed this in `restriction` rather than `pedantic` (as suggested in #8233) since most of the Rust ecosystem already uses single character lifetime names (to my knowledge, at least) and since single character lifetime names aren't incorrect. I'd be happy to change this upon request, however. Fixes#8233.
- [x] Followed lint naming conventions
- [x] Added passing UI tests (including committed `.stderr` file)
- [x] `cargo test` passes locally
- [x] Executed `cargo dev update_lints`
- [x] Added lint documentation
- [x] Run `cargo dev fmt`
changelog: new lint: [`single_char_lifetime_names`]
