[libs] Simplify `unchecked_{shl,shr}`
There's no need for the `const_eval_select` dance here. And while I originally wrote the `.try_into().unwrap_unchecked()` implementation here, it's kinda a mess in MIR -- this new one is substantially simpler, as shown by the old one being above the inlining threshold but the new one being below it in the `mir-opt/inline/unchecked_shifts` tests.
We don't need `u32::checked_shl` doing a dance through both `Result` *and* `Option` 🙃
make mir dataflow graphviz dumps opt-in
This should save some MIR traversals and allocations that are not really needed.
Small win but noticeable locally. Let's see what LTO/PGO say.
r? `@ghost`
refactor(resolve): delete update_resolution function
The `{ resolution.single_imports.remove(); }` code block does not modify the `binding` of this `resolution`. Therefore, the result of `resolution.binding()` before and after `let t = f(self, resolution)` will remain the same, and it will always satisfy the result: `_ if old_binding.is_some() => return t` or `None => return t`.
And then we delete the `update_resolution` function because it only called once.
r? ``@petrochenkov``
Don't try to auto-bless 32-bit `mir-opt` tests on ARM Mac hosts
#112418 added special support for automatically blessing 32-bit output on 64-bit hosts, for the subset of `mir-opt` tests that are pointer-width-dependent.
This relies on the 64-bit host having some corresponding 32-bit target that can be built “easily”. For most 64-bit hosts this is fine, but ARM Macs don't have a corresponding 32-bit target. (There have never been 32-bit ARM Macs, and ARM Macs don't have the libraries needed for building `i686-apple-darwin`.)
There is an entry for `("i686-apple-darwin", "aarch64-apple-darwin")` in the list of corresponding 32-bit platforms, but this doesn't actually work on ARM Macs. Instead, the bootstrap invocation fails to build the necessary 32-bit target support, and nothing gets tested or blessed.
According to [this Zulip thread](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/182449-t-compiler.2Fhelp/topic/Can't.20bless.20any.20mir-opt.20tests.20on.20aarch64.20Mac/near/367109789), that mapping was only added because the author assumed it would work. But since it doesn't actually work on ARM Macs, the solution is to just remove that mapping.
With the mapping removed, ARM Macs still can't auto-bless 32-bit output (they will see a warning instead), but at least they can now bless the output of `mir-opt` tests that don't care about pointer width.
Don't record adjustments twice in `note_source_of_type_mismatch_constraint`
We call `lookup_method` a few times in `note_source_of_type_mismatch_constraint`, but that function has side-effects to the typeck results. Replace it with a less side-effect-y variant of the function for use in diagnostics.
Specifically the ICE in #112532 happens because we're recording deref adjustments twice for a call receiver, which causes `ExprUseVisitor` to be angry.
Fixes#112532
Don't capture `&[T; N]` when contents isn't read
Fixes the check in #111831Fixes#112607, although I decided to test the root cause rather than including the example in the issue as a test.
cc `@BoxyUwU`
Switch the BB CFG cache from postorder to RPO
The `BasicBlocks` CFG cache is interesting:
- it stores a postorder, but `traversal::postorder` doesn't use it
- `traversal::reverse_postorder` does traverse the postorder cache backwards
- we do more RPO traversals than postorder traversals (around 20x on the perf.rlo benchmarks IIRC) but it's not cached
- a couple places here and there were manually reversing the non-cached postorder traversal
This PR switches the order of the cache, and makes a bit more use of it. This is a tiny win locally, but it's also for consistency and aesthetics.
r? `@ghost`
Rollup of 5 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #107200 (io: soften ‘at most one write attempt’ requirement in io::Write::write)
- #112667 (Move WF/ConstEvaluatable goal to clause)
- #112685 (std: only depend on dlmalloc for wasm*-unknown)
- #112722 (bootstrap: check for dry run when copying env vars for msvc)
- #112734 (Make `Bound::predicates` use `Clause`)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Usage of `Pin::new_unchecked(&mut …)` is dangerous with `poll_fn`, even
though the `!Unpin`-infectiousness has made things smoother.
Nonetheless, there are easy ways to avoid the need for any `unsafe`
altogether, be it through `Box::pin`ning, or the `pin!` macro. Since the
latter only works within an `async` context, showing an example
artifically introducing one ought to help people navigate this subtlety
with safety and confidence.
Make `Bound::predicates` use `Clause`
Part of #107250
`Bound::predicates` returns an iterator over `Binder<_, Clause>` instead of `Predicate`.
I tried updating `explicit_predicates_of` as well, but it seems that it needs a lot more change than I thought. Will do it in a separate PR instead.
bootstrap: check for dry run when copying env vars for msvc
The new synthetic targets for mir-opt blessing aren't added to `builder.cc` during dry runs, causing `x.py test tests/mir-opt --bless` to crash on MSVC when it tries to copy env vars to the C compiler invocation. This PR adds a check for dry run to fix the panic.
std: only depend on dlmalloc for wasm*-unknown
It was already filtered out for emscripten, but wasi doesn't need dlmalloc
either since it reuses `unix/alloc.rs`.
io: soften ‘at most one write attempt’ requirement in io::Write::write
At the moment, documentation of std::io::Write::write indicates that
call to it ‘represents at most one attempt to write to any wrapped
object’. It seems that such wording was put there to contrast it with
pre-1.0 interface which attempted to write all the data (it has since
been changed in [RFC 517]).
However, the requirement puts unnecessary constraints and may
complicate adaptors which perform non-trivial transformations on the
data. For example, they may maintain an internal buffer which needs
to be written out before the write method accepts more data. It might
be natural to code the method such that it flushes the buffer and then
grabs another chunk of user data. With the current wording in the
documentation, the adaptor would be forced to return Ok(0).
This commit softens the wording such that implementations can choose
code structure which makes most sense for their particular use case.
While at it, elaborate on the meaning of `Ok(0)` return pointing out
that the write_all methods interprets it as an error.
[RFC 517]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/0517-io-os-reform.html
