During borrowck, the `MultiSpan` from a buffered diagnostic is cloned and
used to emit a delayed bug indicating a diagnostic was buffered - when
the buffered diagnostic is translated, then the cloned `MultiSpan` may
contain labels which can only render with the diagnostic's arguments, but
the delayed bug being emitted won't have those arguments. Adds a function
which clones `MultiSpan` without also cloning the contained labels, and
use this function when creating the buffered diagnostic delayed bug.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david@davidtw.co>
Use maybe_body_owned_by for multiple suggestions
This is a continued work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/113567
We have several other suggestions not working for closure, this PR use `maybe_body_owned_by` to fix them and add test cases for them.
(re-)tighten sourceinfo span of adjustments in MIR
Diagnostics rely on the spans of MIR statements being (approximately) correct in order to give suggestions relative to that span (i.e. `shrink_to_hi` and `shrink_to_lo`).
I discovered that we're *intentionally* lowering THIR exprs with their parent expr's span if they come from adjustments that are due to a parent expression. While I understand why that may be desirable to demonstrate the relationship of an adjustment and the expression that requires it, it leads to
1. very verbose borrowck output
2. incorrect spans for suggestions
Some diagnostics get around that by giving suggestions relative to other spans we've collected during MIR lowering, such as the span of the method's identifier (e.g. `name` in `.name()`), but this doesn't work too well when things come from desugaring.
I assume it also has lead to numerous tweaks and complications to diagnostics code down the road, which this PR doesn't necessarily aim to fix but may open the gates to fixing later... The last three commits are simplifications due to the fact that we can assume that the move span actually points to what is being moved (and a test).
This regressed in #89110, which was debated somewhat in #90286. cc `@Aaron1011` who originally made this change.
r? diagnostics
Fixes#113547Fixes#111016
Rewrite `UnDerefer`, again
This PR is intended to improve the perf regression introduced by #112882.
`UnDerefer` has been separated out again for borrowck reasons. It was a bit overzealous to remove it in the previous PR.
r? `@oli-obk`
It makes it sound like the `ExprKind` and `Rvalue` are supposed to represent all pointer related
casts, when in reality their just used to share a some enum variants. Make it clear there these
are only coercion to make it clear why only some pointer related "casts" are in the enum.
Rewrite `UnDerefer`
Currently, `UnDerefer` is used by drop elaboration to undo the effects of the `Derefer` pass. However, it just recreates the original places with derefs in the middle of the projection. Because `ProjectionElem::Deref` is intended to be removed completely in the future, this will not work forever.
This PR introduces a `deref_chain` method that returns the places behind `DerefTemp` locals in a place and rewrites the move path code to use this. In the process, `UnDerefer` was merged into `MovePathLookup`. Now that move paths use the same places as in the MIR, the other uses of `UnDerefer` no longer require it.
See #98145
cc `@ouz-a`
r? `@oli-obk`
suggest `slice::swap` for `mem::swap(&mut x[0], &mut x[1])` borrowck error
Recently saw someone ask why this code (example slightly modified):
```rs
fn main() {
let mut foo = [1, 2];
std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
}
```
triggers this error and how to fix it:
```
error[E0499]: cannot borrow `foo[_]` as mutable more than once at a time
--> src/main.rs:4:33
|
4 | std::mem::swap(&mut foo[0], &mut foo[1]);
| -------------- ----------- ^^^^^^^^^^^ second mutable borrow occurs here
| | |
| | first mutable borrow occurs here
| first borrow later used by call
|
= help: consider using `.split_at_mut(position)` or similar method to obtain two mutable non-overlapping sub-slices
```
The current help message is nice and goes in the right direction, but I think we can do better for this specific instance and suggest `slice::swap`, which makes this compile
Migrate `TyCtxt::predicates_of` and `ParamEnv::caller_bounds` to `Clause`
The last big change in the series.
I will follow-up with additional filed issues once this PR lands:
- [ ] Investigate making `TypeFoldable<TyCtxt<'tcx>> for ty::Clause<'tcx>` implementation less weird: 2efe091705/compiler/rustc_middle/src/ty/structural_impls.rs (L672)
- [ ] Clean up the elaborator since it should only be emitting child clauses, not predicates
- [ ] Rename identifiers like `pred` and `predicates` to `clause` if they're actually clauses around the codebase
- [ ] Validate that all of the `ToPredicate` impls are acutally still needed, or prune them if they're not
r? `@ghost` until the other branch lands
[-Ztrait-solver=next, mir-typeck] instantiate hidden types in the root universe
Fixes an ICE in the test `member-constraints-in-root-universe`.
Main motivation is to make #112691 pass under the new solver.
r? ``@compiler-errors``
Migrate `item_bounds` to `ty::Clause`
Should be simpler than the next PR that's coming up. Last three commits are the relevant ones.
r? ``@oli-obk`` or ``@lcnr``
Add a fully fledged `Clause` type, rename old `Clause` to `ClauseKind`
Does two basic things before I put up a more delicate set of PRs (along the lines of #112714, but hopefully much cleaner) that migrate existing usages of `ty::Predicate` to `ty::Clause` (`predicates_of`/`item_bounds`/`ParamEnv::caller_bounds`).
1. Rename `Clause` to `ClauseKind`, so it's parallel with `PredicateKind`.
2. Add a new `Clause` type which is parallel to `Predicate`.
* This type exposes `Clause::kind(self) -> Binder<'tcx, ClauseKind<'tcx>>` which is parallel to `Predicate::kind` 😸
The new `Clause` type essentially acts as a newtype wrapper around `Predicate` that asserts that it is specifically a `PredicateKind::Clause`. Turns out from experimentation[^1] that this is not negative performance-wise, which is wonderful, since this a much simpler design than something that requires encoding the discriminant into the alignment bits of a predicate kind, or something else like that...
r? ``@lcnr`` or ``@oli-obk``
[^1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/112714#issuecomment-1595653910
Don't consider TAIT normalizable to hidden ty if it would result in impossible item bounds
See test for example where we shouldn't consider it possible to alias-relate a TAIT and hidden type.
r? `@lcnr`
Take MIR dataflow analyses by mutable reference
The main motivation here is any analysis requiring dynamically sized scratch memory to work. One concrete example would be pointer target tracking, where tracking the results of a dereference can result in multiple possible targets. This leads to processing multi-level dereferences requiring the ability to handle a changing number of potential targets per step. A (simplified) function for this would be `fn apply_deref(potential_targets: &mut Vec<Target>)` which would use the scratch space contained in the analysis to send arguments and receive the results.
The alternative to this would be to wrap everything in a `RefCell`, which is what `MaybeRequiresStorage` currently does. This comes with a small perf cost and loses the compiler's guarantee that we don't try to take multiple borrows at the same time.
For the implementation:
* `AnalysisResults` is an unfortunate requirement to avoid an unconstrained type parameter error.
* `CloneAnalysis` could just be `Clone` instead, but that would result in more work than is required to have multiple cursors over the same result set.
* `ResultsVisitor` now takes the results type on in each function as there's no other way to have access to the analysis without cloning it. This could use an associated type rather than a type parameter, but the current approach makes it easier to not care about the type when it's not necessary.
* `MaybeRequiresStorage` now no longer uses a `RefCell`, but the graphviz formatter now does. It could be removed, but that would require even more changes and doesn't really seem necessary.
Add `-Ztrait-solver=next-coherence`
Flag that conditionally uses the trait solver *only* during coherence, for more testing and/or eventual partial-migration onto the trait solver (in the medium- to long-term).
* This still uses the selection context in some of the coherence methods I think, so it's not "complete". Putting this up for review and/or for further work in-tree.
* I probably need to spend a bit more time making sure that we don't sneakily create any other infcx's during coherence that also need the new solver enabled.
r? `@lcnr`
