Various methods in both libcore/char.rs and librustc_unicode/char.rs were previously marked with #[inline], now every method is marked in char's impl blocks.
Partially fixes#26124.
EDIT: I'm not familiar with pull reqests (yet), apparently Github added my second commit to thit PR...
Fixes#26124
Implement RFC rust-lang/rfcs#1123
Add str method str::split_at(mid: usize) -> (&str, &str).
Also a minor cleanup in the collections::str module. Remove redundant slicing of self.
* Add “complex” mappings to `char::to_lowercase` and `char::to_uppercase`, making them yield sometimes more than on `char`: #25800. `str::to_lowercase` and `str::to_uppercase` are affected as well.
* Add `char::to_titlecase`, since it’s the same algorithm (just different data). However this does **not** add `str::to_titlecase`, as that would require UAX#29 Unicode Text Segmentation which we decided not to include in of `std`: https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/1054 I made `char::to_titlecase` immediately `#[stable]`, since it’s so similar to `char::to_uppercase` that’s already stable. Let me know if it should be `#[unstable]` for a while.
* Add a special case for upper-case Sigma in word-final position in `str::to_lowercase`: #26035. This is the only language-independent conditional mapping currently in `SpecialCasing.txt`.
* Stabilize `str::to_lowercase` and `str::to_uppercase`. The `&self -> String` on `str` signature seems straightforward enough, and the only relevant issue I’ve found is #24536 about naming. But `char` already has stable methods with the same name, and deprecating them for a rename doesn’t seem worth it.
r? @alexcrichton
With the latter is provided by the `From` conversion trait, the former is now completely redundant. Their code is identical. Let’s deprecate now and plan to remove in the next cycle. (It’s `#[unstable]`.)
r? @alexcrichton
CC @nagisa
I had to use `impl<'a, V: Copy> Extend<(usize, &'a V)> for VecMap<V>` instead of `impl<'a, V: Copy> Extend<(&'a usize, &'a V)> for VecMap<V>` as that's what is needed for doing
```rust
let mut a = VecMap::new();
let b = VecMap::new();
b.insert(1, "foo");
a.extend(&b)
```
I can squash the commits after review.
r? @Gankro
The recent bug that was found in LinkedList reminded me of some general cleanup
that's been waiting for some time.
- Use a loop from the front in Drop, it works just as well and without an unsafe block
- Change Rawlink methods to use `unsafe` in an idiomatic way. This does mean that
we need an unsafe block for each dereference of a raw link. Even then, the extent
of unsafe-critical code is even larger of course, since safety depends on the whole
data structure's integrity. This is a general problem we are aware of.
- Some cleanup just to try to decrease the amount of Rawlink handling.
This wasn't marked inline, so wasn't being inlined cross-crate. It's
actually a no-op function, since it's a wrapper around `mem::transmute`.
Marking it inline means that programs calling it can see that it's a
no-op and act accordingly during optimisation.
This wasn't marked inline, so wasn't being inlined cross-crate. It's
actually a no-op function, since it's a wrapper around `mem::transmute`.
Marking it inline means that programs calling it can see that it's a
no-op and act accordingly during optimisation.
collections: Make BinaryHeap panic safe in sift_up / sift_down
Use a struct called Hole that keeps track of an invalid location
in the vector and fills the hole on drop.
I include a run-pass test that the current BinaryHeap fails, and the new
one passes.
NOTE: The BinaryHeap will still be inconsistent after a comparison fails. It will
not have the heap property. What we fix is just that elements will be valid
values.
This is actually a performance win -- the new code does not bother to write in `zeroed()`
values in the holes, it just leaves them as they were.
Net result is something like a 5% decrease in runtime for `BinaryHeap::from_vec`. This
can be further improved by using unchecked indexing (I confirmed it makes a difference,
not a surprise with the non-sequential access going on), but let's leave that for another PR.
Safety first 😉Fixes#25842
Use a struct called Hole that keeps track of an invalid location
in the vector and fills the hole on drop.
I include a run-pass test that the current BinaryHeap fails, and the new
one passes.
Fixes#25842
