There were three issues effecting the example in the getopts rustdoc:
1. The blockquote was incorrectly formatted. Fixed by switching to using
an explicit markdown code section with ```.
2. The `fail fail_str(f)` would not compile. Fixed by using `fail!()` instead
of `fail`.
3. The line `matches.free[0]` produced a compile error about moving from
an immutable vector. Fix by using `copy`.
This allows `TreeMap`/`TreeSet` to fully express their requirements and reduces the comparisons from ~1.5 per level to 1 which really helps for string keys.
I also added `ReverseIter` to the prelude exports because I forgot when I originally added it.
The fix is straight-forward, but there are several changes
while fixing the issue.
1) disallow `mut` keyword when making a new struct
In code base, there are following code,
```rust
struct Foo { mut a: int };
let a = Foo { mut a: 1 };
```
This is because of structural record, which is
deprecated corrently (see issue #3089) In structural
record, `mut` keyword should be allowd to control
mutability. But without structural record, we don't
need to allow `mut` keyword while constructing struct.
2) disallow structural records in parser level
This is related to 1). With structural records, there
is an ambiguity between empty block and empty struct
To solve the problem, I change parser to stop parsing
structural records. I think this is not a problem,
because structural records are not compiled already.
Misc. issues
There is an ambiguity between empty struct vs. empty match stmt.
with following code,
```rust
match x{} {}
```
Two interpretation is possible, which is listed blow
```rust
match (x{}) {} // matching with newly-constructed empty struct
(match x{}) {} // matching with empty enum(or struct) x
// and then empty block
```
It seems that there is no such code in rust code base, but
there is one test which uses empty match statement:
https://github.com/mozilla/rust/blob/incoming/src/test/run-pass/issue-3037.rs
All other cases could be distinguished with look-ahead,
but this can't be. One possible solution is wrapping with
parentheses when matching with an uninhabited type.
```rust
enum what { }
fn match_with_empty(x: what) -> ~str {
match (x) { //use parentheses to remove the ambiguity
}
}
```
This changes various type_names to TypeNames and fixes the example for `tcp::accept` that was still using the old `match` syntax and `{|args| ...}` closures.
The `accept` example was fairly outdated. I was just going to stay away from all the IO things until the scheduler revamp lands, but `accept` is probably one of the obvious starting points for networking stuff for a learner, and I don't want to get in the way of anyone's enthusiasm.
Doesn't touch non-comment lines, so I hope I will get away without learning about unit tests. It doesn't seem like the test system is set up to extract tests from doc comments right now.
Doesn't touch non-comment lines. This changes various type_names to TypeNames
and fixes the example for `tcp::accept` that was still using the old
`match` syntax and `{|args| ...}` closures.
r?
This fixes the current [random failures](http://buildbot.rust-lang.org/builders/auto-linux/builds/291/steps/test/logs/stdio) on the bots and closes#4436 by removing `unwrap_shared_mutable_state` and the code that depends on it. The result is that ARC-like things will not be unwrappable. This feature is complex and is not used outside of test cases.
Note that there is not consensus to remove it.
(second commit)
This removes all but 6 uses of `drop {}` from the entire codebase. Removing any of the remaining uses causes various non-trivial bugs; I'll start reporting them once this gets merged.
* replace the dual next() and get() calls with a single next() function
* drop one of the pointer members from the struct
* add a method for using the lazy iterator with a for loop
* replace the dual next() and get() calls with a single next() function
* drop one of the pointer members from the struct
* add a method for using the lazy iterator with a for loop
