2229: Handle patterns within closures correctly when `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled
This PR fixes several issues related to handling patterns within closures when `capture_disjoint_fields` is enabled.
1. Matching is always considered a use of the place, even with `_` patterns
2. Compiler ICE when capturing fields in closures through `let` assignments
To do so, we
- Introduced new Fake Reads
- Delayed use of `Place` in favor of `PlaceBuilder`
- Ensured that `PlaceBuilder` can be resolved before attempting to extract `Place` in any of the pattern matching code
Closes rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/27
Closes rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/24
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Right now, rustdoc users have an unpleasant situation: they can either
use the new tool lint names (`rustdoc::non_autolinks`) or they can use
the old names (`non_autolinks`). If they use the tool lints, they get a
hard error on stable compilers, because rustc rejects all tool names it
doesn't recognize. If they use the old name, they get a warning to
rename the lint to the new name. The only way to compile without
warnings is to add `#[allow(renamed_removed_lints)]`, which defeats the
whole point of the change: we *want* people to switch to the new name.
To avoid people silencing the lint and never migrating to the tool lint,
this avoids warning about the old name, while still allowing you to use
the new name. Once the new `rustdoc` tool name makes it to the stable
channel, we can change these lints to warn again.
This adds the new lint functions `register_alias` and `register_ignored`
- I didn't see an existing way to do this.
Use delay_span_bug instead of panic in layout_scalar_valid_range
#83054 introduced validation of scalar range attributes, but panicking
code that uses the attribute remained reachable. Use `delay_span_bug`
instead to avoid the ICE.
Fixes#83180.
More informative diagnotic from `x.py test` attempt atop beta checkout
Make bootstrap be more informative when one does `x.py test` on a beta checkout without other mods.
To be clear, by default running `x.py test` on a checkout of the beta branch
currently fails, and with this change will continue to fail, because `x.py
tests` runs `x.py test src/tools/tidy` which tries to run `rustfmt` and that
will fail because the `rustfmt` binary is pinned to the current nighlty and we
do not attempt to distribute one for the beta builds.
This change gives a better error message than the current message, which is just
"./x.py fmt is not supported on this channel" without providing any hint about
what one might do about that problem.
Deprecate RustcEncodable and RustcDecodable.
We can't remove the `RustcEncodable` and `RustcDecodable` derive macros from the prelude, but we can deprecate them.
No background for code in portability snippets
This better matches the appearance of this kind of snippet in the full
item view and is less jarring to read due to repeated
foreground-background changes.
There should be no observable changes to the ayu theme.
Fall-back to sans-serif if Arial is not available
Otherwise on systems where Arial is not available the UA will
fallback to a serif font, rather than a sans-serif one.
This is especially relevant on acessibility-conscious setups (such as is
mine) that have web-fonts disabled and a limited set of fonts available
on the system.
r? ```@GuillaumeGomez``` cc ```@jsha```
Added `try_exists()` method to `std::path::Path`
This method is similar to the existing `exists()` method, except it
doesn't silently ignore the errors, leading to less error-prone code.
This change intentionally does NOT touch the documentation of `exists()`
nor recommend people to use this method while it's unstable.
Such changes are reserved for stabilization to prevent confusing people.
Apart from that it avoids conflicts with #80979.
`@joshtriplett` requested this PR in [internals discussion](https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/the-api-of-path-exists-encourages-broken-code/13817/25?u=kixunil)
Certain features of Linux (getauxval() and epoll_create1()) are only
available in android SDK/NDK levels 18 and 21 respectively. The 32bit
platform is currently on level 14 for compatibility with Android 4.0.
This patch adds SDK/NDK level 21 to the docker for 32 bit platforms,
while leaving the default setup at level 14.
With this done, projects such as `rustup` which rely on these dockers
can build with modern ecosystem crates such as tokio 1.0, by using
the level 21 toolchain, but those which do not need to switch will
be unaffected, since the level 14 toolchain remains available.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Silverstone <dsilvers@digital-scurf.org>
Allow rustdoc to handle asm! of foreign architectures
This allows rustdoc to process code containing `asm!` for architectures other than the current one. Since this never reaches codegen, we just replace target-specific registers and register classes with a dummy one.
Fixes#82869
StructField -> FieldDef ("field definition")
Field -> ExprField ("expression field", not "field expression")
FieldPat -> PatField ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Also rename visiting and other methods working on them.
Add a `min_type_alias_impl_trait` feature gate
This new feature gate only permits type alias impl trait to be constrained by function and trait method return types. All other possible constraining sites like const/static types, closure return types and binding types are now forbidden and gated under the `type_alias_impl_trait` and `impl_trait_in_bindings` feature gates (which are both marked as incomplete, as they have various ways to ICE the compiler or cause query cycles where they shouldn't).
r? `@nikomatsakis`
This is best reviewed commit-by-commit
To be clear, by default running `x.py test` on a checkout of the beta branch
currently fails, and with this change will continue to fail, because `x.py
tests` runs `x.py test src/tools/tidy` which tries to run `rustfmt` and that
will fail because the `rustfmt` binary is pinned to the current nighlty and we
do not attempt to distribute one for the beta builds.
This change gives a better error message than the current message, which is just
"./x.py fmt is not supported on this channel" without providing any hint about
what one might do about that problem.
(update: placated tidy.)
83054 introduced validation of scalar range attributes, but panicking
code that uses the attribute remained reachable. Use `delay_span_bug`
instead to avoid the ICE.
Consider functions to be reachable for code coverage purposes, either
when they reach the code generation directly, or indirectly as inlined
part of another function.
When codegenning code coverage use the instance that coverage data was
originally generated for, to ensure basic level of compatibility with
MIR inlining.
We now lint on *any* use of `procedural-masquerade` crate. While this
crate still exists, its main reverse dependency (`cssparser`) no longer
depends on it. Any crates still depending off should stop doing so, as
it only exists to support very old Rust versions.
If a crate actually needs to support old versions of rustc via
`procedural-masquerade`, then they'll just need to accept the warning
until we remove it entirely (at the same time as the back-compat hack).
The latest version of `procedural-masquerade` does not work with the
latest rustc, but trying to check for the version seems like more
trouble than it's worth.
While working on this, I realized that the `proc-macro-hack` check was
never actually doing anything. The corresponding enum variant in
`proc-macro-hack` is named `Value` or `Nested` - it has never been
called `Input`. Due to a strange Crater issue, the Crater run that
tested adding this did *not* end up testing it - some of the crates that
would have failed did not actually have their tests checked, making it
seem as though the `proc-macro-hack` check was working.
The Crater issue is being discussed at
https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/242791-t-infra/topic/Nearly.20identical.20Crater.20runs.20processed.20a.20crate.20differently/near/230406661
Despite the `proc-macro-hack` check not actually doing anything, we
haven't gotten any reports from users about their build being broken.
I went ahead and removed it entirely, since it's clear that no one is
being affected by the `proc-macro-hack` regression in practice.
