Fixes#24249
I've tagged all items that were missing docs to allow them to compile for now, the ones in core/num should probably be documented at least.
This is also a breaking change for any crates using `#[deny(missing_docs)]` that have undocumented constants, not sure there is any way to avoid this without making it a separate lint?
bound that is likely to change. In that case, it will change to 'static,
so then scan down the graph to see whether there are any hard
constraints that would prevent 'static from being a valid value
here. Report a warning.
This doesn't add a test for the main problem in #8640 since it seems that
was already fixed (including a test) in PR #19522. This just adds a test
for a program mentioned in the comments that used to erroneously compile.
Closes#8640.
This was originally motivated by checking for HRTB hygiene, but I found several other bugs on the way.
This does not fix the biggest user of ty_walk, which is dtorck - I would prefer to coordinate that with @pnkfelix.
r? @eddyb
This catches the case when a trait defines a default method that calls
itself, but on a type that isn't necessarily `Self`, e.g. there's no
reason that `T = Self` in the following, so the call isn't necessarily
recursive (`T` may override the call).
trait Bar {
fn method<T: Bar>(&self, x: &T) {
x.method(x)
}
}
Fixes#26333.
This makes them compliant with the new version of RFC 401 (i.e.
RFC 1052).
Fixes#26391. I *hope* the tests I have are enough.
This is a [breaking-change]
r? @nrc
This commit shards the all-encompassing `core`, `std_misc`, `collections`, and `alloc` features into finer-grained components that are much more easily opted into and tracked. This reflects the effort to push forward current unstable APIs to either stabilization or removal. Keeping track of unstable features on a much more fine-grained basis will enable the library subteam to quickly analyze a feature and help prioritize internally about what APIs should be stabilized.
A few assorted APIs were deprecated along the way, but otherwise this change is just changing the feature name associated with each API. Soon we will have a dashboard for keeping track of all the unstable APIs in the standard library, and I'll also start making issues for each unstable API after performing a first-pass for stabilization.
Currently in the E0252 message, traits and modules are all called types (as in "a type named `Foo` has already been imported", even when `Foo` was a trait or module). This commit changes that to additionally detect when the import in question is a trait or module and report it accordingly.
Fixes#25396.
This makes them compliant with the new version of RFC 401 (i.e.
RFC 1052).
Fixes#26391. I *hope* the tests I have are enough.
This is a [breaking-change]
Previously, it said "import `Foo` conflicts with existing submodule" even
when it was a type alias, enum, or trait. The message now says the conflict
is with "type in this module" in the case of the first two, and "trait in
this module" for the last one.
Fixes#24081.
Unlike coercing from reference to unsafe pointer, coercing between two
unsafe pointers doesn't need an AutoDerefRef, because there is no region
that regionck would need to know about.
In unoptimized libcore, this reduces the number of "auto_deref" allocas
from 174 to 4.
Currently in the E0252 message, traits and modules are all called types
(as in "a type named `Foo` has already been imported", even when `Foo` was
a trait or module). This commit changes that to additionally detect when
the import in question is a trait or module and report it accordingly.
Fixes#25396.
When we successfully resolve a trait reference with no type/lifetime parameters, like `i32: Foo` or `Box<u32>: Sized`, this is in fact globally true. This patch adds a simple global to the tcx to cache such cases. The main advantage of this is really about caching things like `Box<Vec<Foo>>: Sized`. It also points to the need to revamp our caching infrastructure -- the current caches make selection cost cheaper, but we still wind up paying a high cost in the confirmation process, and in particular unrolling out dependent obligations. Moreover, we should probably do caching more uniformly and with a key that takes the where-clauses into account. But that's for later.
For me, this shows up as a reasonably nice win (20%) on Servo's script crate (when built in dev mode). This is not as big as my initial measurements suggested, I think because I was building my rustc with more debugging enabled at the time. I've not yet done follow-up profiling and so forth to see where the new hot spots are. Bootstrap times seem to be largely unaffected.
cc @pcwalton
This is technically a [breaking-change] in that functions with unsatisfiable where-clauses may now yield errors where before they may have been accepted. Even before, these functions could never have been *called* by actual code. In the future, such functions will probably become illegal altogether, but in this commit they are still accepted, so long as they do not rely on the unsatisfiable where-clauses. As before, the functions still cannot be called in any case.
Previously, it said "import `Foo` conflicts with existing submodule" even
when it was a type alias, enum, or trait. The message now says the conflict
is with "type in this module" in the case of the first two, and "trait in
this module" for the last one.
Fixes#24081.
Unlike coercing from reference to unsafe pointer, coercing between two
unsafe pointers doesn't need an AutoDerefRef, because there is no region
that regionck would need to know about.
In unoptimized libcore, this reduces the number of "auto_deref" allocas
from 174 to 4.
again, do it once and then just remember the expanded form. At the same
time, filter globally nameable predicates out of the environment, since
they can cause cache errors (and they are not necessary in any case).
Two commits here: one which removes a bunch of tests, and re-enables a few that work.
Second updates the syntax of one of the failing tests. It still doesn't pass, but at least it compiles.
Most of these are old, but some specific messages for specific tests:
* trait-contravariant-self.rs: failed due to a soundess hole:
05e3248a79
* process-detatch: 15966c3c1f
says "this test is being ignored until signals are implemented" That's
not happening for a long time, and when it is, we'll write tests for
it.
* deep-vector{,2}.rs: "too big for our poor macro infrastructure", and has
been ignored over a year.
* borrowck-nested-calls.rs's FIXME #6268 was closed in favor of
rust-lang/rfcs#811
* issue-15167.rs works properly now
* issue-9737.rs works properly now
* match-var-hygiene.rs works properly now
Addresses a chunk of #3965
Part of #24407.
Currently the diagnostics for range patterns are a bit wrong:
```rust
fn main() {
match 5u32 {
0 ... 10 => (),
'a' ... 10 => (),
10 ... 'z' => (),
"what" ... 10 => (),
"what" ... "well" => (),
10 ... "what" => ()
}
}
```
```
range.rs:4:9: 4:19 error: mismatched types in range:
expected integral variable,
found char [E0211]
range.rs:4 'a' ... 10 => (),
^~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:4:9: 4:16 error: only char and numeric types are allowed in range [E0029]
range.rs:4 'a' ... 10 => (),
^~~~~~~
range.rs:4:9: 4:19 error: mismatched types:
expected `u32`,
found `char`
(expected u32,
found char) [E0308]
range.rs:4 'a' ... 10 => (),
^~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:5:9: 5:19 error: mismatched types in range:
expected char,
found integral variable [E0211]
range.rs:5 10 ... 'z' => (),
^~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:5:9: 5:15 error: only char and numeric types are allowed in range [E0029]
range.rs:5 10 ... 'z' => (),
^~~~~~
range.rs:6:9: 6:22 error: mismatched types in range:
expected integral variable,
found &-ptr [E0211]
range.rs:6 "what" ... 10 => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:6:9: 6:19 error: only char and numeric types are allowed in range [E0029]
range.rs:6 "what" ... 10 => (),
^~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:6:9: 6:22 error: mismatched types:
expected `u32`,
found `&'static str`
(expected u32,
found &-ptr) [E0308]
range.rs:6 "what" ... 10 => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:7:9: 7:19 error: only char and numeric types are allowed in range [E0029]
range.rs:7 "what" ... "well" => (),
^~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:7:9: 7:26 error: mismatched types:
expected `u32`,
found `&'static str`
(expected u32,
found &-ptr) [E0308]
range.rs:7 "what" ... "well" => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:8:9: 8:22 error: mismatched types in range:
expected &-ptr,
found integral variable [E0211]
range.rs:8 10 ... "what" => ()
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
range.rs:8:9: 8:15 error: only char and numeric types are allowed in range [E0029]
range.rs:8 10 ... "what" => ()
^~~~~~
error: aborting due to 12 previous errors
```
The problems here are:
1. The type of the end of the range is used to predict the type of the start (only mildly counter intuitive).
2. E0029 is erroneously generated for `char ... num` and `num ... char`.
2. `u32` is mentioned.
3. Errors which are essentially the same are reported multiple times.
I've attempted to fix this by checking the requirements in a different order. The output I've achieved for the above example is:
```
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:4:17: 4:22 error: mismatched types in range:
expected char,
found integral variable [E0211]
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:4 'a' ... 10 => (),
^~~~~
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:5:16: 5:22 error: mismatched types in range:
expected integral variable,
found char [E0211]
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:5 10 ... 'z' => (),
^~~~~~
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:6:9: 6:19 error: only char and numeric types are allowed in range [E0029]
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:6 "what" ... 10 => (),
^~~~~~~~~~
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:6:9: 6:19 help: run `rustc --explain E0029` to see a detailed explanation
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:6:9: 6:19 note: Start type: &'static str
End type: _
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:6 "what" ... 10 => (),
^~~~~~~~~~
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:7:9: 7:26 error: only char and numeric types are allowed in range [E0029]
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:7 "what" ... "well" => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:7:9: 7:26 help: run `rustc --explain E0029` to see a detailed explanation
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:7:9: 7:26 note: Start type: &'static str
End type: &'static str
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:7 "what" ... "well" => (),
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:8:16: 8:25 error: only char and numeric types are allowed in range [E0029]
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:8 10 ... "what" => ()
^~~~~~~~~
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:8:16: 8:25 help: run `rustc --explain E0029` to see a detailed explanation
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:8:16: 8:25 note: Start type: _
End type: &'static str
/home/michael/Temp/range.rs:8 10 ... "what" => ()
^~~~~~~~~
error: aborting due to 5 previous errors
```
I think this is already tonnes better, but the `Start type/End type` stuff could be neater. I don't think there's really any need to start a `note:` block but I wanted to get some feedback on this. I'd also appreciate advice on how to print the integer types as something other than `_`.
This was always a weird feature, and isn't being used in the compiler.
Static assertions should be done better than this.
This implements RFC #1096.
Fixes#13951Fixes#23008Fixes#6676
This is behind a feature gate, but that's still a
[breaking-change]
The E0397 explanation, as I've written it, isn't really an explanation, but I'm not sure what to put here. I will happily take suggestions.
Partially addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/25851
Currently, for `use` declarations with multiple paths, only the `use` item itself is saved in the AST map, not the individual path nodes. This can lead to a problem when a span of a specific path node is needed.
For example, #24818 caused an ICE because of this, in `ImportResolver::check_for_conflicting_import()`.
Fixes#25763.
Changes:
- adds explanations for E0185, E0186, E0202, E0326
- fixes the explanation for E0053. The previous description was too narrow; there are other error cases.
- changes the error message for E0202 to be specific for associated types, since it seems inherent associated constants are implemented.
Part of #24407
Closes#25046 (by rejecting the code that causes the ICE) and #24946. I haven't been able to deal with the array size or recursion issues yet for associated consts, though my hope was that the change I made for range match patterns might help with array sizes, too.
This PR is pretty much orthogonal to #25065.
Currently, for `use` declarations with multiple paths, only the `use`
item itself is saved in the AST map, not the individual path nodes. This
can lead to a problem when a span of a specific path node is needed.
For example, #24818 caused an ICE because of this, in
`ImportResolver::check_for_conflicting_import()`.
Fixes#25763.
- add feature gate
- add basic tests
- adjust parser to eliminate conflict between `const fn` and associated
constants
- allow `const fn` in traits/trait-impls, but forbid later in type check
- correct some merge conflicts
I think I didn't run tests properly - my second call to
select_all_obligations_or_error has made 3 tests fail. However, this is
just an error message change - integer fallback never worked with casts.
This should hopefully fix all cast-related ICEs once and for all.
I managed to make diagnostics hate me and give me spurious "decoder error"
- removing $build/tmp/extended-errors seems to fix it.
Constants with values that depend on generic parameters or `Self` cause
ICEs in `check_const`, and are not yet accepted via RFC, so we need to
throw a proper error in these cases.
This allows compiling entire crates from memory or preprocessing source files before they are tokenized.
Minor API refactoring included, which is a [breaking-change] for libsyntax users:
* `ParseSess::{next_node_id, reserve_node_ids}` moved to rustc's `Session`
* `new_parse_sess` -> `ParseSess::new`
* `new_parse_sess_special_handler` -> `ParseSess::with_span_handler`
* `mk_span_handler` -> `SpanHandler::new`
* `default_handler` -> `Handler::new`
* `mk_handler` -> `Handler::with_emitter`
* `string_to_filemap(sess source, path)` -> `sess.codemap().new_filemap(path, source)`
This also updates the error messages for both. For E0066, it removes mention
of "managed heap", which was removed in 8a91d33. For E0069, I just tweaked
the wording to make it a bit more explicit.
Also change several error messages to refer to "items" rather than
"methods", since associated items that require resolution during type
checking are not always methods.
There is no subtyping relationship between the types (or their non-freshened
variants), so they can not be merged.
Fixes#22645Fixes#24352Fixes#23825
Should fix#25235 (no test in issue).
Should fix#19976 (test is outdated).
* segfault due to not copying drop flag when coercing
* fat pointer casts
* segfault due to not checking drop flag properly
* debuginfo for DST smart pointers
* unreachable code in drop glue
There is no subtyping relationship between the types (or their non-freshened
variants), so they can not be merged.
Fixes#22645Fixes#24352Fixes#23825
Should fix#25235 (no test in issue).
Should fix#19976 (test is outdated).
There were still some mentions of `~[T]` and `~T`, mostly in comments and debugging statements. I tried to do my best to preserve meaning, but I might have gotten some wrong-- I'm happy to fix anything :)
Fixes the problem in #16974 with unhelpful error messages when accidentally using the wrong syntax for the `crate_type="lib"` attribute. The attribute syntax error now shows up instead of "main function not found".
If the user intended to set the crate_type to "lib" but accidentally used
incorrect syntax such as `#![crate_type(lib)]`, the compilation would fail with
"main function not found". This made it hard to locate the source of the
problem, since the failure would cause the warning about the incorrect
attribute not to be shown.
This change is worrisome to me, both because:
1. I thought the rules in RFC 599 imply that the `Box<Trait>` without `'static`
in the first case would expand to the second case, but their behaviors
here differ. And,
2. The explicit handling of `'static` should mean `dropck` has no application
here and thus we should have seen no change to the expected error messages.
Nonetheless, the error messages changed.
The error message was misleading, so I adjusted it, and I also added the long diagnostics for this error (resolves one point in #24407).
I was unsure about how to phrase the error message. Is “generic parameter binding” the correct term for this?
The [UnsafeCell documentation says it is undefined behavior](http://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/std/cell/struct.UnsafeCell.html), so people shouldn't do it.
This happened to catch one case in libstd that was doing this, and I switched that to use an UnsafeCell internally.
Closes#13146
[breaking-change] Technically breaking, since code that had been using
these transmutes before will no longer compile. However, it was
undefined behavior, so really, it's a good thing. Fixing your code would
require some re-working to use an UnsafeCell instead.
Closes#13146
typeck: Make sure casts from other types to fat pointers are illegal
Fixes ICEs where non-fat pointers and scalars are cast to fat pointers,
Fixes#21397Fixes#22955Fixes#23237Fixes#24100
The new functionality being tested here is that a drop impl bounded by
`UserDefined` does not cause dropck to inject its conservative
constraints on region inference.
Closes#17841.
The majority of the work should be done, e.g. trait and inherent impls, different forms of UFCS syntax, defaults, and cross-crate usage. It's probably enough to replace the constants in `f32`, `i8`, and so on, or close to good enough.
There is still some significant functionality missing from this commit:
- ~~Associated consts can't be used in match patterns at all. This is simply because I haven't updated the relevant bits in the parser or `resolve`, but it's *probably* not hard to get working.~~
- Since you can't select an impl for trait-associated consts until partway through type-checking, there are some problems with code that assumes that you can check constants earlier. Associated consts that are not in inherent impls cause ICEs if you try to use them in array sizes or match ranges. For similar reasons, `check_static_recursion` doesn't check them properly, so the stack goes ka-blooey if you use an associated constant that's recursively defined. That's a bit trickier to solve; I'm not entirely sure what the best approach is yet.
- Dealing with consts associated with type parameters will raise some new issues (e.g. if you have a `T: Int` type parameter and want to use `<T>::ZERO`). See rust-lang/rfcs#865.
- ~~Unused associated consts don't seem to trigger the `dead_code` lint when they should. Probably easy to fix.~~
Also, this is the first time I've been spelunking in rustc to such a large extent, so I've probably done some silly things in a couple of places.
An actual typeck error is the cause of many failed compilations but an
unrelated bug is being reported instead. It is triggered because a typeck
error is presumably not yet identified during compiler execution, which
would normally bypass an invariant in the presence of other errors. In
this particular situation, we delay the reporting of the bug until
abort_if_errors().
Closes#23827, closes#24356, closes#23041, closes#22897, closes#23966,
closes#24013, and closes#23729
**There is at least one situation where this bug may still be genuinely
triggered (#23437).**
As part of the audit for #22820 the following duplicate feature
gate tests were removed:
* `box_patterns`
* `simd_ffi`
These tests for `box_patterns` and `simd_ffi` were added in #23578,
however there were existing tests in #20723 and #21233 respectively.
r? @nrc
As part of the audit for #22820 the following feature gate tests have been
added:
* `negate_unsigned`
* `on_unimplemented`
* `optin_builtin_traits`
* `plugin`
* `rustc_attrs`
* `rustc_diagnostic_macros`
* `slice_patterns`
In addition some feature gate error message typos fixed.
Rather than storing the relations between free-regions in a global
table, introduce a `FreeRegionMap` data structure. regionck computes the
`FreeRegionMap` for each fn and stores the result into the tcx so that
borrowck can use it (this could perhaps be refactored to have borrowck
recompute the map, but it's a bid tedious to recompute due to the
interaction of closures and free fns). The main reason to do this is
because of #22779 -- using a global table was incorrect because when
validating impl method signatures, we want to use the free region
relationships from the *trait*, not the impl.
Fixes#22779.
As part of the audit for #22820 the following duplicate feature
gate tests were removed:
* `box_patterns`
* `simd_ffi`
These tests for `box_patterns` and `simd_ffi` were added in #23578,
however there were existing tests in #20723 and #21233 respectively.
As part of the audit for #22820 the following feature gate tests have
been added:
* `negate_unsigned`
* `on_unimplemented`
* `optin_builtin_traits`
* `plugin`
* `rustc_attrs`
* `slice_patterns`
This PR uses the inline error suggestions introduced in #24242 to modify a few existing `help` messages. The new errors look like this:
foobar.rs:5:12: 5:25 error: expected a path on the left-hand side of `+`,
not `&'static Copy` [E0178]
foobar.rs:5 let x: &'static Copy + 'static;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
foobar.rs:5:12: 5:35 help: try adding parentheses (per RFC 438):
foobar.rs: let x: &'static (Copy + 'static);
foobar.rs:2:13: 2:23 error: cast to unsized type: `&_` as `core::marker::Copy`
foobar.rs:2 let x = &1 as Copy;
^~~~~~~~~~
foobar.rs:2:19: 2:23 help: try casting to a reference instead:
foobar.rs: let x = &1 as &Copy;
foobar.rs:7:24: 7:25 error: expected expression, found `;`
foobar.rs:7 let x = box (1 + 1);
^
foobar.rs:7:13: 7:16 help: try using `box()` instead:
foobar.rs: let x = box() (1 + 1);
This also modifies compiletest to give the ability to directly test suggestions given by error messages.
Check for duplicate loop labels in function bodies.
See also: http://internals.rust-lang.org/t/psa-rejecting-duplicate-loop-labels/1833
The change, which we are putting in as future-proofing in preparation for future potential additions to the language (namely labeling arbitrary blocks and using those labels in borrow expressions), means that code like this will start emitting warnings:
```rust
fn main() {
{ 'a: loop { break; } }
{ 'a: loop { break; } }
}
```
To make the above code compile without warnings, write this instead:
```rust
fn main() {
{ 'a: loop { break; } }
{ 'b: loop { break; } }
}
```
Since this change is only introducing a new warnings, this change is non-breaking.
Fix#21633
PR #24242 added the ability to the compiler to directly give suggestions about
how to modify code to fix an error. The new errors look like this:
foobar.rs:5:12: 5:25 error: expected a path on the left-hand side of `+`,
not `&'static Copy` [E0178]
foobar.rs:5 let x: &'static Copy + 'static;
^~~~~~~~~~~~~
foobar.rs:5:12: 5:35 help: try adding parentheses (per RFC 438):
foobar.rs: let x: &'static (Copy + 'static);
foobar.rs:2:13: 2:23 error: cast to unsized type: `&_` as `core::marker::Copy`
foobar.rs:2 let x = &1 as Copy;
^~~~~~~~~~
foobar.rs:2:19: 2:23 help: try casting to a reference instead:
foobar.rs: let x = &1 as &Copy;
foobar.rs:7:24: 7:25 error: expected expression, found `;`
foobar.rs:7 let x = box (1 + 1);
^
foobar.rs:7:13: 7:16 help: try using `box()` instead:
foobar.rs: let x = box() (1 + 1);
This also modifies compiletest to give the ability to directly test suggestions
given by error messages.
At the moment, when compilation is stopped at a stop point (like `-Z parse-only`), `rustc` does not return an nonzero exit code even if there are errors (expect fatal ones, that cause it to panic immediately). As an example, compiling `src/test/compile-fail/doc-before-semi.rs` with `-Z parse-only` raises an error, but exists with 0.
Note that I could not use `sess.abort_if_errors()` in the macro, because `sess` is passed by value and move at some point.
table, introduce a `FreeRegionMap` data structure. regionck computes the
`FreeRegionMap` for each fn and stores the result into the tcx so that
borrowck can use it (this could perhaps be refactored to have borrowck
recompute the map, but it's a bid tedious to recompute due to the
interaction of closures and free fns). The main reason to do this is
because of #22779 -- using a global table was incorrect because when
validating impl method signatures, we want to use the free region
relationships from the *trait*, not the impl.
Fixes#22779.
This makes it illegal to have unconstrained lifetimes that appear in an associated type definition. Arguably, we should prohibit all unconstrained lifetimes -- but it would break various macros. It'd be good to evaluate how large a break change it would be. But this seems like the minimal change we need to do to establish soundness, so we should land it regardless. Another variant would be to prohibit all lifetimes that appear in any impl item, not just associated types. I don't think that's necessary for soundness -- associated types are different because they can be projected -- but it would feel a bit more consistent and "obviously" safe. I'll experiment with that in the meantime.
r? @aturon
Fixes#22077.
which get mentioned in an associated type are constrained. Arguably we
should just require that all regions are constrained, but that is more
of a breaking change.
typeck: Do high-level structural/signature checks before function body checks.
This avoids various ICEs, e.g. premature calls to cat_expr that yield the dreaded "cat_expr Errd" ICE.
However, it also means that some early error feedback is now not provided. This may be for the best, because the error feedback were were providing in some of those cases were false positives -- it was spurious feedback and a distraction from the real problem.
So it is not 100% clear whether we actually want to put this change in or not. I think its a net win, but others might disagree.
(Kudos to @arielb1 for suggesting this modification.)
Extend rustc::middle::dataflow to allow filtering kills from flow-exits.
Fix borrowck analysis so that it will not treat a break that pops through an assignment
```rust
x = { ... break; ... }
```
as a kill of the "moved-out" bit for `x`.
Fix#24267.
[breaking-change], but really, its only breaking code that was already buggy.
An actual typeck error is the cause of many failed compilations but an
unrelated bug is being reported instead. It is triggered because a typeck
error is presumably not yet identified during compiler execution, which
would normally bypass an invariant in the presence of other errors. In
this particular situation, we delay the reporting of the bug until
abort_if_errors().
Closes#23827, closes#24356, closes#23041, closes#22897, closes#23966,
closes#24013, and closes#23729
* In `noop_fold_expr`, call `new_span` in these cases:
- `ExprMethodCall`'s identifier
- `ExprField`'s identifier
- `ExprTupField`'s integer
Calling `new_span` for `ExprMethodCall`'s identifier is necessary to print
an acceptable diagnostic for `write!(&2, "")`. We see this error:
```
<std macros>:2:20: 2:66 error: type `&mut _` does not implement any method in scope named `write_fmt`
<std macros>:2 ( & mut * $ dst ) . write_fmt ( format_args ! ( $ ( $ arg ) * ) ) )
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
```
With this change, we also see a macro expansion backtrace leading to
the `write!(&2, "")` call site.
* After fully expanding a macro, we replace the expansion expression's
span with the original span. Call `fld.new_span` to add a backtrace to
this span. (Note that I'm call `new_span` after `bt.pop()`, so the macro
just expanded isn't on the backtrace.)
The motivating example for this change is `println!("{}")`. The format
string literal is `concat!($fmt, "arg")` and is inside the libstd macro.
We need to see the backtrace to find the `println!` call site.
* Add a backtrace to the `format_args!` format expression span.
r? alexcrichton
Addresses #23459
We provide tools to tell what exact symbols to emit for any fn or static, but
don’t quite check if that won’t cause any issues later on. Some of the issues
include LLVM mangling our names again and our names pointing to wrong locations,
us generating dumb foreign call wrappers, linker errors, extern functions
resolving to different symbols altogether (`extern {fn fail();} fail();` in some
cases calling `fail1()`), etc.
Before the commit we had a function called `note_unique_llvm_symbol`, so it is
clear somebody was aware of the issue at some point, but the function was barely
used, mostly in irrelevant locations.
Along with working on it I took liberty to start refactoring trans/base into
a few smaller modules. The refactoring is incomplete and I hope I will find some
motivation to carry on with it.
This is possibly a [breaking-change] because it makes dumbly written code
properly invalid.
This fixes all those issues about incorrect use of #[no_mangle] being not reported/misreported/ICEd by the compiler.
NB. This PR does not attempt to tackle the parallel codegen issue that was mentioned in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/22811, but I believe it should be very straightforward in a follow up PR by modifying `trans::declare::get_defined_value` to look at all the contexts.
cc @alexcrichton @huonw @nrc because you commented on the original RFC issue.
EDIT: wow, this became much bigger than I initially intended.
Don't use skolemized parameters but rather fresh variables in coherence. Skolemized parameters wind up preventing unification. Surprised we had no test for this! Fixes#24241.
r? @pnkfelix
Example showing sample inputs, old message, new message:
https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/11126784ac678b7eb6ba
Also adds infrastructure for reporting suggestions \"in situ\" and does some (minor) cleanups to `CodeMap`.
r? @brson
Statement macros are now treated somewhat like item macros, in that a statement macro can now expand into a series of statements, rather than just a single statement.
This allows statement macros to be nested inside other kinds of macros and expand properly, where previously the expansion would only work when no nesting was present.
See:
- `src/test/run-pass/macro-stmt_macro_in_expr_macro.rs`
- `src/test/run-pass/macro-nested_stmt_macro.rs`
This changes the interface of the MacResult trait. make_stmt has become make_stmts and now returns a vector, rather than a single item. Plugin writers who were implementing MacResult will have breakage, as well as anyone using MacEager::stmt.
See:
- `src/libsyntax/ext/base.rs`
This also causes a minor difference in behavior to the diagnostics produced by certain malformed macros.
See:
- `src/test/compile-fail/macro-incomplete-parse.rs`
