Rework "point at arg" suggestions to be more accurate
Fixes#100560
Introduce a new set of `ObligationCauseCode`s which have additional bookeeping for what expression caused the obligation, and which predicate caused the obligation. This allows us to look at the _unsubstituted_ signature to find out which parameter or generic type argument caused an obligaton to fail.
This means that (in most cases) we significantly improve the likelihood of pointing out the right argument that causes a fulfillment error. Also, since this logic isn't happening in just the `select_where_possible_and_mutate_fulfillment()` calls in the argument checking code, but instead during all trait selection in `FnCtxt`, we are also able to point out the correct argument even if inference means that we don't know whether an obligation has failed until well after a call expression has been checked.
r? `@ghost`
Replace most uses of `pointer::offset` with `add` and `sub`
As PR title says, it replaces `pointer::offset` in compiler and standard library with `pointer::add` and `pointer::sub`. This generally makes code cleaner, easier to grasp and removes (or, well, hides) integer casts.
This is generally trivially correct, `.offset(-constant)` is just `.sub(constant)`, `.offset(usized as isize)` is just `.add(usized)`, etc. However in some cases we need to be careful with signs of things.
r? ````@scottmcm````
_split off from #100746_
some general mir typeck cleanup
this pr contains the parts of #95763 which already work correctly.
the remaining commits of that PR have some issues which are more complex to fix.
r? types
Minor syntax and formatting update to doc comment on `find_vtable_types_for_unsizing`
I noticed the code examples on this function weren't formatted as code, and also the that the syntax for trait objects was out of date (or just incorrect). This should bring it up to date.
Deriving SessionDiagnostic on a type no longer forces that diagnostic to
be one of warning, error, or fatal. The level is instead decided when
the struct is passed to the respective Handler::emit_*() method.
Refactor: remove unnecessary string searchings
This patch removes unnecessary string searchings for checking if function arguments have `&` and `&mut`.
Revert "Revert "Allow dynamic linking for iOS/tvOS targets.""
This reverts commit 16e10bf81e (PR #77716).
The original original PR enabled `cdylib` builds for iOS. However this caused problems because:
> This new feature in Rust 1.46 added a lot of headache for iOS builds with cdylib targets. cdylib target is near impossible to build if you are using any crate with native dependencies (ex. openssl, libsodium, zmq). You can't just find .so files for all architectures to perform correct linking. Usual workflow is the following:
>
> 1. You build staticlib and rely that native dependencies will be linked as frameworks later
> 2. You setup right cocoapods in ObjectiveC/Swift wrapper.
>
> As cargo doesn't support platform-dependent crate types https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/4881 as a result a lot of projects now broken on Rust 1.46
However, this will be soon a thing of the past since 1.64 brings us the long awaited much anticipated `--crate-type` flag.
> I see that this got merged recently: https://github.com/rust-lang/cargo/issues/10083. The --crate-type flag will get stabilized in 1.64. In 1.64, you could still get a successful iOS staticlib with cargo build --crate-type=statclib even if the crate has cdylib targets too. If I'm not mistaken, this solves the problem too so this PR could be reverted in 1.64 with relatively little headache.
So summing up, I think this PR can be reverted in 1.64. 🤞
Reenable disabled early syntax gates as future-incompatibility lints
- MCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/535
The approach taken by this PR is
- Introduce a new lint, `unstable_syntax_pre_expansion`, and reenable the early syntax gates to emit it
- Use the diagnostic stashing mechanism to stash warnings the early warnings
- When the hard error occurs post expansion, steal and cancel the early warning
- Don't display any stashed warnings if errors are present to avoid the same noise problem that hiding type ascription errors is avoiding
Commits are working commits, but in a coherent steps-to-implement manner. Can be squashed if desired.
The preexisting `soft_unstable` lint seems like it would've been a good fit, but it is deny-by-default (appropriate for `#[bench]`) and these gates should be introduced as warn-by-default.
It may be desirable to change the stash mechanism's behavior to not flush lint errors in the presence of other errors either (like is done for warnings here), but upgrading a stash-using lint from warn to error perhaps is enough of a request to see the lint that they shouldn't be hidden; additionally, fixing the last error to get new errors thrown at you always feels bad, so if we know the lint errors are present, we should show them.
Using a new flag/mechanism for a "weak diagnostic" which is suppressed by other errors may also be desirable over assuming any stashed warnings are "weak," but this is the first user of stashing warnings and seems an appropriate use of stashing (it follows the "know more later to refine the diagnostic" pattern; here we learn that it's in a compiled position) so we get to define what it means to stash a non-hard-error diagnostic.
cc `````@petrochenkov````` (seconded MCP)
Make `same_type_modulo_infer` a proper `TypeRelation`
Specifically, this fixes#100690 because we no longer consider a `ReLateBound` and a `ReVar` to be equal. `ReVar` can only be equal to free regions or static.
Add the diagnostic translation lints to crates that don't emit them
Some of these have a note saying that they should build on a stable compiler, does that mean they shouldn't get these lints? Or can we cfg them out on those?
Migrate "invalid variable declaration" errors to SessionDiagnostic
After seeing the great blog post on Inside Rust, I decided to try my hand at this. Just one diagnostic for now to get used to the workflow and to check if this is the way to do it or if there are any problems.
suggest `once_cell::Lazy` for non-const statics
Addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100410
Some questions:
- removing the `if` seems to include too many cases (e.g. calls to non-const functions inside a `const fn`), but this code excludes the following case:
```rust
const FOO: Foo = non_const_fn();
```
Should we suggest `once_cell` in this case as well?
- The original issue mentions suggesting `AtomicI32` instead of `Mutex<i32>`, should this PR address that as well?
Mention `as_mut` alongside `as_ref` in borrowck error message
Kinda fixes#99426 but I guess that really might be better staying open to see if we could make it suggest `as_mut` in a structured way. Not sure how to change borrowck to know that info tho.
