Basically, `Iterator` is re-exported via several steps, which happened to not be
resolved yet when we got to the prelude import, but since the name resolved to
the reexport from `core::iter` (just to no actual items), we gave up trying to
resolve it further.
Maybe part of the problem is that we can have
`PartialResolvedImport::Unresolved` or `PartialResolvedImport::Indeterminate`
with `None` in all namespaces, and handle them differently.
Fixes#2683.
The `-` turned into a `+` during a refactoring.
The original issue was caused by `Read` resolving wrongly to a trait without
type parameters instead of a struct with one parameter; this only fixes the
crash, not the wrong resolution.
2657: Omit closure parameters in closure type display strings r=flodiebold a=SomeoneToIgnore
Part of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/1946
I wonder, should we display the the closure trait (Fn/FnMut/FnOnce) in inlay hints instead of `|...|` at all?
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
2661: Implement infer await from async function r=flodiebold a=edwin0cheng
This PR is my attempt for trying to add support for infer `.await` expression from an `async` function, by desugaring its return type to `Impl Future<Output=RetType>`.
Note that I don't know it is supposed to desugaring it in that phase, if it is not suitable in current design, just feel free to reject it :)
r=@flodiebold
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
It's not very different, except we can directly use Salsa IDs instead of casting
them. This means we need to refactor the handling of errors to get rid of
UNKNOWN_TRAIT though.
2623: Add support macros in impl blocks r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR add support for macros in impl blocks, which reuse `Expander` for macro expansion.
see also: #2459
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
2592: Add std::ops::Index support for infering r=edwin0cheng a=edwin0cheng
see also #2534
Seem like this can't fix#2534 for this case:
```rust
fn foo3(bar: [usize; 2]) {
let baz = bar[1]; // <--- baz is still unknown ?
println!("{}", baz);
}
```
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
When calling a function, argument-position impl Trait is transparent; same for
return-position impl Trait when inside the function. So in these cases, we need
to represent that type not by `Ty::Opaque`, but by a type variable that can be
unified with whatever flows into there.
