Unbox mutexes and condvars on some platforms
Both mutexes and condition variables contained a Box containing the actual os-specific object. This was done because moving these objects may cause undefined behaviour on some platforms.
However, this is not needed on Windows[1], Wasm[2], cloudabi[2], and 'unsupported'[3], were the box was only needlessly making them less efficient.
This change gets rid of the box on those platforms.
On those platforms, `Condvar` can no longer verify it is only used with one `Mutex`, as mutexes no longer have a stable address. This was addressed and considered acceptable in #76932.
[1]\: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/api/synchapi/nf-synchapi-initializesrwlock
[2]\: These are just a single atomic integer together with futex wait/wake calls/instructions.
[3]\: The `unsupported` platform doesn't support multiple threads at all.
Improve rustdoc error for failed intra-doc link resolution
The previous error was confusing since it made it sound like you can't
link to items that are defined outside the current module.
Also suggested importing the item.
r? @jyn514
Add some regression tests
Closes#66501Closes#68951Closes#72565Closes#74244Closes#75299
The first issue is fixed in 1.43.0, other issues are fixed in the recent nightly.
Use `tracing` spans to trace the entire MIR interp stack
r? @RalfJung
While being very verbose, this allows really good tracking of what's going on. While I considered schemes like the previous indenter that we had (which we could get by using the `tracing-tree` crate), this will break down horribly with things like multithreaded rustc. Instead, we can now use `RUSTC_LOG` to restrict the things being traced. You could specify a filter in a way that only shows the logging of a specific frame.
If we lower the span's level to `debug`, then in `info` level logging we'd not see the frames, but in `debug` level we would see them. The filtering rules in `tracing` are super powerful, but I'm not sure if we can specify a filter so we do see `debug` level events, but *not* the `frame` spans. The documentation at https://docs.rs/tracing-subscriber/0.2.10/tracing_subscriber/struct.EnvFilter.html makes me think that we can only turn on things, not turn off things at a more precise level.
cc @hawkw
Use less divisions in display u128/i128
This PR is an absolute mess, and I need to test if it improves the speed of fmt::Display for u128/i128, but I think it's correct.
It hopefully is more efficient by cutting u128 into at most 2 u64s, and also chunks by 1e16 instead of just 1e4.
Also I specialized the implementations for uints to always be non-false because it bothered me that it was checked at all
Do not merge until I benchmark it and also clean up the god awful mess of spaghetti.
Based on prior work in #44583
cc: `@Dylan-DPC`
Due to work on `itoa` and suggestion in original issue:
r? `@dtolnay`
Backports LLVM commit:
[APFloat] convert SNaN to QNaN in convert() and raise Invalid signal
149f5b573c
SNaN to QNaN conversion also matches what my Intel x86_64 hardware does.
The destination propagation as currently implemented does not supersede
the NRVO, e.g., the destination propagation never applies if either
local has an address taken, while NRVO might.
Additionally, the issue with failing assertions had been already
resolved.
Continue running both optimizations at mir-opt-level >= 2.
This makes the code a lot easier to work with. It also makes it easier
to add new fields without updating each variant and `match`
individually.
- Name the `Kind` variant after `DocFragmentKind` from `collapse_docs`
- Remove unneeded impls
These appear along the cleanup path inside functions with
`#[unwind(aborts)]`. We don't const-check the cleanup path anyways,
since const-eval already has "abort-on-panic" semantics and there's
often drops that would otherwise be forbidden, so the check wasn't
really preventing anything anyways.
Allow Weak::as_ptr and friends for unsized T
Relaxes `impl<T> Weak<T>` to `impl<T: ?Sized> Weak<T>` for the methods `rc::Weak::as_ptr`, `into_raw`, and `from_raw`.
Follow-up to #73845, which did most of the impl work to make these functions work for `T: ?Sized`.
We still have to adjust the implementation of `Weak::from_raw` here, however, because I missed a use of `ptr.is_null()` previously. This check was necessary when `into`/`from_raw` were first implemented, as `into_raw` returned `ptr::null()` for dangling weak. However, we now just (wrapping) offset dangling weaks' pointers the same as nondangling weak, so the null check is no longer necessary (or even hit). (I can submit just 17a928f as a separate PR if desired.)
As a nice side effect, moves the `fn is_dangling` definition closer to `Weak::new`, which creates the dangling weak.
This technically stabilizes that "something like `align_of_val_raw`" is possible to do. However, I believe the part of the functionality required by these methods here -- specifically, getting the alignment of a pointee from a pointer where it may be dangling iff the pointee is `Sized` -- is uncontroversial enough to stabilize these methods without a way to implement them on stable Rust.
r? `@RalfJung,` who reviewed #73845.
ATTN: This changes (relaxes) the (input) generic bounds on stable fn!
This matches Cargo behavior and avoids the (somewhat expensive) double checking,
as well as the unfortunate duplicate error messages (#76822,
rust-lang/cargo#5128).
