Add macro_braces lint to check for irregular brace use in certain macros
The name is a bit long but this sounds good as `#[allow(unconventional_macro_braces)]` and it seems more clear that we are talking about the macro call not macro definitions, any feedback let me know. Thanks!
fixes#7278
changelog: Add ``[`unconventional_macro_braces`]`` lint that checks for uncommon brace usage with macros.
Rename unconventional -> nonstandard, add config field
Add standard_macro_braces fields so users can specify macro names and
brace combinations to lint for in the clippy.toml file.
Fix errors caused by nonstandard_macro_braces in other lint tests
Fix users ability to override the default nonstandard macro braces
Add type position macros impl `check_ty`
Remove requirement of fully qualified path for disallowed_method/type
changelog: Remove the need for fully qualified paths in disallowed_method and disallowed_type
After fixing this issue in [import_rename](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/7300#discussion_r650127720) I figured I'd fix it for these two.
If this does in fact fix the **Known problems:** section I was planning to remove them from both lints after confirmation.
Vec extend to append
This PR adds a check to suggest changes of vector from
```
vec.extend(other_vec.drain(..))
```
could be written as
```
vec![].append(&mut vec![]);
```
changelog: Add vec_extend_to_append lint
issue: #7209
Don't trigger `field_reassign_with_default` in macros
Fixes#7155
Producing a good suggestion for this lint is already hard when no macros
are involved. With macros the lint message and the suggestion are just
confusing. Since both, producing a good suggestion and figuring out if
this pattern can be re-written inside a macro is nearly impossible, just
bail out.
changelog: [`field_reassign_with_default`] No longer triggers in macros
---
No that our reviewing queue is under control, I want to start hacking on Clippy myself again. Starting with an easy issue to get back in :)
Add disallowed_type lint, this adds a field to the conf struct
Fixes#7277
changelog: Add ``[`disallowed_type`]`` a lint that can enforce banning types specified in the config.
Fix false positive on `semicolon_if_nothing_returned`
Currently the [`semicolon_if_nothing_returned`](https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#semicolon_if_nothing_returned) lint fires in unwanted situations where a block only spans one line. An example of this was given in #7324. This code:
```rust
use std::mem::MaybeUninit;
use std::ptr;
fn main() {
let mut s = MaybeUninit::<String>::uninit();
let _d = || unsafe { ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr()) };
}
```
yields the following clippy error:
```
error: consider adding a `;` to the last statement for consistent formatting
--> src/main.rs:6:26
|
6 | let _d = || unsafe { ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr()) };
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: add a `;` here: `ptr::drop_in_place(s.as_mut_ptr());`
|
= note: `-D clippy::semicolon-if-nothing-returned` implied by `-D clippy::pedantic`
= help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#semicolon_if_nothing_returned
```
I updated the lint to check if the statement is inside an `unsafe` block, a closure or a normal block and if the block only spans one line, in that case the lint is not emitted.
This closes#7324.
changelog: enhanced semicolon if nothing returned according to #7324.
Refactoring identity function lints
I've noticed that we have several lints that all check for identity functions and each used their own check implementation. I moved the `is_expr_identity_function` function to `clippy_utils` and adapted all lints to reuse that one function. This should make the addition of new lints like this also easier in the future.
I've also moved the `map_identity` lint into the `methods` module. It's probably the best to review this PR by checking each commit individually. And that's it, have a great day 🙃
changelog: none
fix `while_let_on_iterator` suggestion in a closure
fixes: #7249
A future improvement would be to check if the closure is being used as `FnOnce`, in which case the original suggestion would be correct.
changelog: Suggest `&mut iter` inside a closure for `while_let_on_iterator`
Fix missing_docs_in_private_items false negative
changelog: Fix [`missing_docs_in_private_items`] false negative when the item has any `#[name = "value"]` attribute
Closes#7247 (decided not to use the rustc method since it calls `Session::check_name`, which is for rustc only)
Fix allow on some statement lints
changelog: Fix `#[allow(..)]` over statements for [`needless_collect`], [`short_circuit_statement`] and [`unnecessary_operation`]
Fixes#7171Fixes#7202
