3998: Make add_function generate functions in other modules via qualified path r=matklad a=TimoFreiberg
Additional feature for #3639
- [x] Add tests for paths with more segments
- [x] Make generating the function in another file work
- [x] Add `pub` or `pub(crate)` to the generated function if it's generated in a different module
- [x] Make the assist jump to the edited file
- [x] Enable file support in the `check_assist` helper
4006: Syntax highlighting for format strings r=matklad a=ltentrup
I have an implementation for syntax highlighting for format string modifiers `{}`.
The first commit refactors the changes in #3826 into a separate struct.
The second commit implements the highlighting: first we check in a macro call whether the macro is a format macro from `std`. In this case, we remember the format string node. If we encounter this node during syntax highlighting, we check for the format modifiers `{}` using regular expressions.
There are a few places which I am not quite sure:
- Is the way I extract the macro names correct?
- Is the `HighlightTag::Attribute` suitable for highlighting the `{}`?
Let me know what you think, any feedback is welcome!
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <leander.tentrup@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Leander Tentrup <ltentrup@users.noreply.github.com>
4126: Don't omit methods with self from path completion r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
It's sometimes useful to create a reference to these items (eg. for use as a function pointer). Perhaps these should be given lower score though, if that's possible?
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
4105: Adds attribute completions (#3941) r=matklad a=jrvidal
I've hacked together some basic completions for a few builtin attributes.
* I have no idea what `CompletionItemKind` we should set for them.
* There's plenty of fancy stuff we could do by detecting the item the attribute is being added to. Nothing of that here.
* Maybe we could complete as soon as you type `#` or `#!`?
I'm not sure what info exactly we can dump on `CompletionContext` and what we should query during the completion calculation itself. I've assumed adding an `is_attribute` field is OK, since it allows to discard the completion quickly if it doesn't apply. Later we inspect the AST to find out whether it is an inner attribute or not.
Co-authored-by: Roberto Vidal <vidal.roberto.j@gmail.com>
If `hierarchicalDocumentSymbolSupport` is not true in the client capabilites
then it does not support the `DocumentSymbol[]` return type from the
`textDocument/documentSymbol` request and we must fall back to `SymbolInformation[]`.
This is one of the few requests that use the client capabilities to
differentiate between return types and could cause problems for clients.
See https://github.com/microsoft/language-server-protocol/pull/538#issuecomment-442510767 for more context.
Found while looking at #144
4101: Panic proc macro srv if read request failed r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR fixed a bug when the rust-analyzer is killed suddenly, the `rust-analyzer proc-macro` will become stale.
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
I might be reading this wrong, but it looks like we are setting it to
essentially arbitrary string at the moment, as there are no defined
order on the items in the *set* of completions.
4106: Fix wrong substitution code r=matklad a=flodiebold
We need to shift in when we're substituting inside a binder.
This should fix#4053 (it doesn't fix the occasional overflow that also occurs on the Diesel codebase though).
Co-authored-by: Florian Diebold <flodiebold@gmail.com>
We need to shift in when we're substituting inside a binder.
This should fix#4053 (it doesn't fix the occasional overflow that also occurs
on the Diesel codebase though).
3954: Improve autocompletion by looking on the type and name r=matklad a=bnjjj
This tweet (https://twitter.com/tjholowaychuk/status/1248918374731714560) gaves me the idea to implement that in rust-analyzer.
Basically for this first example I made some examples when we are in a function call definition. I look on the parameter list to prioritize autocompletions for the same types and if it's the same type + the same name then it's displayed first in the completion list.
So here is a draft, first step to open a discussion and know what you think about the implementation. It works (cf tests) but maybe I can make a better implementation at some places. Be careful the code needs some refactoring to be better and concise.
PS: It was lot of fun writing this haha
Co-authored-by: Benjamin Coenen <5719034+bnjjj@users.noreply.github.com>
4111: Record definitions in `extern` blocks r=jonas-schievink a=jonas-schievink
Enables completion of extern functions and statics.
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/3711
4112: Add Launch configuration for release build r=matklad a=jonas-schievink
The debug build takes very long until I can test anything useful, with the release build it's much quicker. Add another Run configuration for it.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
4107: Disable onEnter command by default r=matklad a=matklad
We are transitioning from experimental to production-ready stance, so
it makes sense to disable potentially disruptive features by default.
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
4102: Cleanup proc_macro config r=matklad a=matklad
In general, there should be no reason to call `.to_string_lossy`.
If you want to display the path, use `.display()`.
If you want to pass the path to an OS API (like std::process::Command)
than use `PathBuf` or `OsString`.
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
In general, there should be no reason to call `.to_string_lossy`.
If you want to display the path, use `.display()`.
If you want to pass the path to an OS API (like std::process::Command)
than use `PathBuf` or `OsString`.
