Remove the unused StableSet and StableMap types from rustc_data_structures.
The current implementation is not "stable" in the same sense that `HashStable` and `StableHasher` are stable, i.e. across compilation sessions. So, in my opinion, it's better to remove those types (which are basically unused anyway) than to give the wrong impression that these are safe for incr. comp.
I plan to provide new "stable" collection types soon that can be used to replace `FxHashMap` and `FxHashSet` in query results (see [draft](69d03ac7a7)). It's unsound that `HashMap` and `HashSet` implement `HashStable` (see https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98890 for a recent P-critical bug caused by this) -- so we should make some progress there.
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99212 (introduce `implied_by` in `#[unstable]` attribute)
- #99352 (Use `typeck_results` to avoid duplicate `ast_ty_to_ty` call)
- #99355 (better error for bad depth parameter on macro metavar expr)
- #99480 (Diagnostic width span is not added when '0$' is used as width in format strings)
- #99488 (compiletest: Allow using revisions with debuginfo tests.)
- #99489 (rustdoc UI fixes)
- #99508 (Avoid `Symbol` to `String` conversions)
- #99510 (adapt assembly/static-relocation-model test for LLVM change)
- #99516 (Use new tracking issue for proc_macro::tracked_*.)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Diagnostic width span is not added when '0$' is used as width in format strings
When the following code is run rustc does not add diagnostic spans for the width argument. Such spans are necessary for a clippy lint that I am currently writing.
```rust
println!("Hello {1:0$}!", 5, "x");
// ^^
// Should have a span here
```
introduce `implied_by` in `#[unstable]` attribute
Requested by the library team [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/131828-t-compiler/topic/better.20support.20for.20partial.20stabilizations/near/285581519).
If part of a feature is stabilized and a new feature is added for the remaining parts, then the `implied_by` meta-item can be added to `#[unstable]` to indicate which now-stable feature was used previously.
```diagnostic
error: the feature `foo` has been partially stabilized since 1.62.0 and is succeeded by the feature `foobar`
--> $DIR/stability-attribute-implies-using-unstable.rs:3:12
|
LL | #![feature(foo)]
| ^^^
|
note: the lint level is defined here
--> $DIR/stability-attribute-implies-using-stable.rs:2:9
|
LL | #![deny(stable_features)]
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
help: if you are using features which are still unstable, change to using `foobar`
|
LL | #![feature(foobar)]
| ~~~~~~
help: if you are using features which are now stable, remove this line
|
LL - #![feature(foo)]
|
```
When a `#![feature(..)]` attribute still exists for the now-stable attribute, then there this has two effects:
- There will not be an stability error for uses of items from the implied feature which are still unstable (until the `#![feature(..)]` is removed or updated to the new feature).
- There will be an improved diagnostic for the remaining use of the feature attribute for the now-stable feature.
```rust
/// If part of a feature is stabilized and a new feature is added for the remaining parts,
/// then the `implied_by` attribute is used to indicate which now-stable feature previously
/// contained a item.
///
/// ```pseudo-Rust
/// #[unstable(feature = "foo", issue = "...")]
/// fn foo() {}
/// #[unstable(feature = "foo", issue = "...")]
/// fn foobar() {}
/// ```
///
/// ...becomes...
///
/// ```pseudo-Rust
/// #[stable(feature = "foo", since = "1.XX.X")]
/// fn foo() {}
/// #[unstable(feature = "foobar", issue = "...", implied_by = "foo")]
/// fn foobar() {}
/// ```
```
In the Zulip discussion, this was envisioned as `implies` on `#[stable]` but I went with `implied_by` on `#[unstable]` because it means that only the unstable attribute needs to be changed in future, not the new stable attribute, which seems less error-prone. It also isn't particularly feasible for me to detect whether items from the implied feature are used and then only suggest updating _or_ removing the `#![feature(..)]` as appropriate, so I always do both.
There's some new information in the cross-crate metadata as a result of this change, that's a little unfortunate, but without requiring that the `#[unstable]` and `#[stable]` attributes both contain the implication information, it's necessary:
```rust
/// This mapping is necessary unless both the `#[stable]` and `#[unstable]` attributes should
/// specify their implications (both `implies` and `implied_by`). If only one of the two
/// attributes do (as in the current implementation, `implied_by` in `#[unstable]`), then this
/// mapping is necessary for diagnostics. When a "unnecessary feature attribute" error is
/// reported, only the `#[stable]` attribute information is available, so the map is necessary
/// to know that the feature implies another feature. If it were reversed, and the `#[stable]`
/// attribute had an `implies` meta item, then a map would be necessary when avoiding a "use of
/// unstable feature" error for a feature that was implied.
```
I also change some comments to documentation comments in the compiler, add a helper for going from a `Span` to a `Span` for the entire line, and fix a incorrect part of the pre-existing stability attribute diagnostics.
cc `@yaahc`
interpret: rename Tag/PointerTag to Prov/Provenance
We were pretty inconsistent with calling this the "tag" vs the "provenance" of the pointer; I think we should consistently call it "provenance".
r? `@oli-obk`
Add PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN environment variable
This allows overriding the toolchain used to run `proc-macro-srv` tests.
---
Sample usage.
Testing the current ABI (variable unset/empty):
```shell
amos@tails ~/bearcove/rust-analyzer/crates/proc-macro-srv proc-macro-test-toolchain*
❯ PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN="" cargo test --quiet
running 16 tests
................
test result: ok. 16 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.01s
```
Testing an older ABI:
```shell
amos@tails ~/bearcove/rust-analyzer/crates/proc-macro-srv proc-macro-test-toolchain*
❯ PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN="1.58" cargo test --quiet
running 16 tests
................
test result: ok. 16 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.01s
```
Testing current nightly ABI:
```shell
❯ rustc +nightly --version
rustc 1.64.0-nightly (f8588549c 2022-07-18)
❯ PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN="nightly" cargo test --quiet
running 16 tests
................
test result: ok. 16 passed; 0 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.01s
```
Testing future ABI (`rust-lang/rust` master):
```shell
amos@tails ~/bearcove/rust-analyzer/crates/proc-macro-srv proc-macro-test-toolchain
❯ PROC_MACRO_TEST_TOOLCHAIN="stage1" cargo test --quiet
running 16 tests
..........thread '<unnamed>' panicked at 'range end index 216221164920373249 out of range for slice of length 18', library/core/src/slice/index.rs:73:5
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
....F.
failures:
---- tests::test_fn_like_macro2 stdout ----
thread 'tests::test_fn_like_macro2' panicked at 'called `Result::unwrap()` on an `Err` value: "range end index 216221164920373249 out of range for slice of length 18"', crates/proc-macro-srv/src/tests/utils.rs:38:83
note: run with `RUST_BACKTRACE=1` environment variable to display a backtrace
failures:
tests::test_fn_like_macro2
test result: FAILED. 15 passed; 1 failed; 0 ignored; 0 measured; 0 filtered out; finished in 0.00s
error: test failed, to rerun pass '--lib
```
---
Tagging `@jonas-schievink:` this might be helpful when updating versioned ABIs later on.
Add proc-macro-srv integration test that clones literals
This exercises some of the upcoming proc_macro bridge changes. It should also pass for all supported ABIs, with the older-style bridge.
This changed is tracked in:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12818
Build proc-macro-test-impl out-of-tree
Building it in-place fails in rust CI because the source directory is read-only. This changes `proc-macro-test`'s build script to first
copy `imp` under `OUT_DIR` (which is read-write).
It also prints stdout/stderr for the nested cargo invocation, should it fail. (I've seen failures in rust CI that I couldn't explain, and
when they take 25 minutes to reproduce, you want to have that info)
This change is tracked in:
* https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/issues/12818
Maintainer impact: none.
* Add a test for atomic operations introduced in #97423 & #98383.
* Add a test for fallback code generation strategy used on LLVM 12
introduced in #98385. Use a separate test case instead of a revision
system since test will be gone once LLVM 12 is no longer supported.
