This fixes#31512 for me.
A bit of explanation: I want to have `check_block_post(&mut self, &Context, &Block)` and `check_crate_post(&mut self, &Context, &Crate)` methods in both early and late lint passes. Ideally we'd have _post methods for all operations that walk, but this'll do for now.
@Manishearth r?
This adds back the raw_pointer_derive lint as a 'removed' lint, so that its removal does not cause errors (#30346) but warnings.
In the process I discovered regressions in the code for renamed and removed lints, which didn't appear to have any tests. The addition of a second lint pass (ast vs. hir) meant that attributes were being inspected twice, renamed and removed warnings printed twice. I restructured the code so these tests are only done once and added tests. Unfortunately it makes the patch more complicated for the needed beta backport.
r? @nikomatsakis
There is now more structure to the report, so that you can specify e.g. an RFC/PR/issue number and other explanatory details.
Example message:
```
type-parameter-invalid-lint.rs:14:8: 14:9 error: defaults for type parameters are only allowed on type definitions, like `struct` or `enum`
type-parameter-invalid-lint.rs:14 fn avg<T=i32>(_: T) {}
^
type-parameter-invalid-lint.rs:14:8: 14:9 warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
type-parameter-invalid-lint.rs:14:8: 14:9 note: for more information, see PR 30742 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/30724>
type-parameter-invalid-lint.rs:11:9: 11:28 note: lint level defined here
type-parameter-invalid-lint.rs:11 #![deny(future_incompatible)]
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
error: aborting due to previous error
```
r? @brson
I would really like feedback also on the specific messages!
Fixes#30746
It was recently realized that we accept defaulted type parameters everywhere, without feature gate, even though the only place that we really *intended* to accept them were on types. This PR adds a lint warning unless the "type-parameter-defaults" feature is enabled. This should eventually become a hard error.
This is a [breaking-change] in that new feature gates are required (or simply removing the defaults, which is probably a better choice as they have little effect at this time). Results of a [crater run][crater] suggest that approximately 5-15 crates are affected. I didn't do the measurement quite right so that run cannot distinguish "true" regressions from "non-root" regressions, but even the upper bound of 15 affected crates seems relatively minimal.
[crater]: https://gist.github.com/nikomatsakis/760c6a67698bd24253bf
cc @rust-lang/lang
r? @pnkfelix
nodes in statement position.
Extended #[cfg] folder to allow removal of statements, and
of expressions in optional positions like expression lists and trailing
block expressions.
Extended lint checker to recognize lint levels on expressions and
locals.
[breaking-change] for lint authors
You must now implement LateLintPass or EarlyLintPass as well as LintPass and use either register_late_lint_pass or register_early_lint_pass, rather than register_lint_pass.
