int/uint aren't considered FFI safe, replace them with the actual type they
represent (i64/u64 or i32/u32). This is a breaking change, but at most a cast
to `uint` or `int` needs to be added.
[breaking-change]
As of RFC 18, struct layout is undefined. Opting into a C-compatible struct
layout is now down with #[repr(C)]. For consistency, specifying a packed
layout is now also down with #[repr(packed)]. Both can be specified.
To fix errors caused by this, just add #[repr(C)] to the structs, and change
#[packed] to #[repr(packed)]
Closes#14309
[breaking-change]
It's unfortunate that the read+write operands need special treatment in the AST. A separate vec for all expressions is an alternative, but it doesn't play nicely with trans.
Fixes#14936
Stop read+write expressions from expanding into two occurences
in the AST. Add a bool to indicate whether an operand in output
position if read+write or not.
Fixes#14936
First commit enables regex test on Windows. It was not working at some point (#13725), but it works now.
Second commit removes various FIXMEs regarding #13793, since upstream bug has been fixed.
declared with the same name in the same scope.
This breaks several common patterns. First are unused imports:
use foo::bar;
use baz::bar;
Change this code to the following:
use baz::bar;
Second, this patch breaks globs that import names that are shadowed by
subsequent imports. For example:
use foo::*; // including `bar`
use baz::bar;
Change this code to remove the glob:
use foo::{boo, quux};
use baz::bar;
Or qualify all uses of `bar`:
use foo::{boo, quux};
use baz;
... baz::bar ...
Finally, this patch breaks code that, at top level, explicitly imports
`std` and doesn't disable the prelude.
extern crate std;
Because the prelude imports `std` implicitly, there is no need to
explicitly import it; just remove such directives.
The old behavior can be opted into via the `import_shadowing` feature
gate. Use of this feature gate is discouraged.
This implements RFC #116.
Closes#16464.
[breaking-change]
Crates that are resolved normally have their path canonicalized and all
symlinks resolved. This does currently not happen for paths specified
using the --extern option to rustc, which can lead to rustc thinking
that it encountered two different versions of a crate, when it's
actually the same version found through different paths.
Fixes#16496
When a struct implements Drop, its fields should still drop in
declaration order (just as they do when the struct does not implement
Drop).
Fixes#16492.
When a struct implements Drop, its fields should still drop in
declaration order (just as they do when the struct does not implement
Drop).
Fixes#16492.
Crates that are resolved normally have their path canonicalized and all
symlinks resolved. This does currently not happen for paths specified
using the --extern option to rustc, which can lead to rustc thinking
that it encountered two different versions of a crate, when it's
actually the same version found through different paths.
To fix this, we must store the canonical path for crates found via
--extern and also use the canonical path when comparing paths.
Fixes#16496
These `where` clauses are accepted everywhere generics are currently
accepted and desugar during type collection to the type parameter bounds
we have today.
A new keyword, `where`, has been added. Therefore, this is a breaking
change. Change uses of `where` to other identifiers.
[breaking-change]
r? @nikomatsakis (or whoever)
These `where` clauses are accepted everywhere generics are currently
accepted and desugar during type collection to the type parameter bounds
we have today.
A new keyword, `where`, has been added. Therefore, this is a breaking
change. Change uses of `where` to other identifiers.
[breaking-change]
This patch primarily does two things: (1) it prevents lifetimes from
leaking out of unboxed closures; (2) it allows unboxed closure type
notation, call notation, and construction notation to construct closures
matching any of the three traits.
This breaks code that looked like:
let mut f;
{
let x = &5i;
f = |&mut:| *x + 10;
}
Change this code to avoid having a reference escape. For example:
{
let x = &5i;
let mut f; // <-- move here to avoid dangling reference
f = |&mut:| *x + 10;
}
I believe this is enough to consider unboxed closures essentially
implemented. Further issues (for example, higher-rank lifetimes) should
be filed as followups.
Closes#14449.
[breaking-change]
r? @pnkfelix
This patch primarily does two things: (1) it prevents lifetimes from
leaking out of unboxed closures; (2) it allows unboxed closure type
notation, call notation, and construction notation to construct closures
matching any of the three traits.
This breaks code that looked like:
let mut f;
{
let x = &5i;
f = |&mut:| *x + 10;
}
Change this code to avoid having a reference escape. For example:
{
let x = &5i;
let mut f; // <-- move here to avoid dangling reference
f = |&mut:| *x + 10;
}
I believe this is enough to consider unboxed closures essentially
implemented. Further issues (for example, higher-rank lifetimes) should
be filed as followups.
Closes#14449.
[breaking-change]
by-reference upvars.
This partially implements RFC 38. A snapshot will be needed to turn this
on, because stage0 cannot yet parse the keyword.
Part of #12831.
r? @alexcrichton
by-reference upvars.
This partially implements RFC 38. A snapshot will be needed to turn this
on, because stage0 cannot yet parse the keyword.
Part of #12381.
I chose to make two of them because I wanted something close to an
"end-to-end" test (*), but at the same time I wanted a test that
would run on Windows (**).
(*) The run-make test serves as the end-to-end: It constructs an input
that is trying to subvert the hack and we are going to check that it
fails in the attempt).
(**) The compile-fail-fulldeps test serves as a more narrow test that
will be tested on all platforms. It also attempts to subvert the
hack, testing that when you use `new_parser_from_tts`, the resulting
parser does not support reading embedded Idents.
This fixes borrow checking for closures. Code like this will break:
struct Foo {
x: int,
}
pub fn main() {
let mut this = &mut Foo {
x: 1,
};
let r = || {
let p = &this.x;
&mut this.x;
};
r()
}
Change this code to not take multiple mutable references to the same value. For
example:
struct Foo {
x: int,
}
pub fn main() {
let mut this = &mut Foo {
x: 1,
};
let r = || {
&mut this.x;
};
r()
}
Closes#16361.
[breaking-change]
r? @nikomatsakis
`for` loop heads.
This breaks code like:
let x = Some(box 1i);
for &a in x.iter() {
}
Change this code to obey the borrow checking rules. For example:
let x = Some(box 1i);
for &ref a in x.iter() {
}
Closes#16205.
[breaking-change]
r? @nikomatsakis
`for` loop heads.
This breaks code like:
let x = Some(box 1i);
for &a in x.iter() {
}
Change this code to obey the borrow checking rules. For example:
let x = Some(box 1i);
for &ref a in x.iter() {
}
Closes#16205.
[breaking-change]
Previously the stability lint considered cross-crate items only. That's appropriate for unstable and experimental levels, but not for deprecation.
In addition to changing the lint, this PR takes care of the fallout: a number of deprecated items that were being used throughout libstd.
Closes#16409
Due to deny(deprecated), this is a:
[breaking-change]
This fixes borrow checking for closures. Code like this will break:
struct Foo {
x: int,
}
pub fn main() {
let mut this = &mut Foo {
x: 1,
};
let r = || {
let p = &this.x;
&mut this.x;
};
r()
}
Change this code to not take multiple mutable references to the same value. For
example:
struct Foo {
x: int,
}
pub fn main() {
let mut this = &mut Foo {
x: 1,
};
let r = || {
&mut this.x;
};
r()
}
Closes#16361.
[breaking-change]
Previously the lint considered cross-crate items only. That's
appropriate for unstable and experimental levels, but not for
deprecation.
Closes#16409
Due to deny(deprecation), this is a:
[breaking-change]
