This is a patch to fix#6031. I didn't see any tests for the C++ library code, so I didn't write a test for my changes. Did I miss something, or are there really no tests?
This allows cross-crate inlining which is *very* good because this is called a
lot throughout libstd (even when libstd is inlined across crates).
In one of my projects, I have a test case with the following performance characteristics
commit | optimization level | runtime (seconds)
----|------|----
before | O2 | 22s
before | O3 | 107s
after | O2 | 13s
after | O3 | 12s
I'm a bit disturbed by the 107s runtime from O3 before this commit. The performance characteristics of this test involve doing an absurd amount of small operations. A huge portion of this is creating hashmaps which involves allocating vectors.
The worst portions of the profile are:
Which as you can see looks like some *serious* problems with inlining. I would expect the hash map methods to be high up in the profile, but the top 9 callers of `cast::transmute_copy` were `Repr::repr`'s various monomorphized instances.
I wish there we a better way to detect things like this in the future, and it's unfortunate that this is required for performance in the first place. I suppose I'm not entirely sure why this is needed because all of the methods should have been generated in-crate (monomorphized versions of library functions), so they should have gotten inlined? It also could just be that by modifying LLVM's idea of the inline cost of this function it was able to inline it in many more locations.
Here's a fix for issue #7588, "Overflow handling of from_str methods is broken".
The integer overflow issues are taken care of by checking to see if the multiply-by-radix-and-add-next-digit process is reversible. If it overflowed, then some information is lost and the process is irreversible, in which case, None is returned.
Floats now consistently return Some(Inf) of Some(-Inf) on overflow thanks to a call to NumStrConv::inf() and NumStrConv::neg_inf() respectively when the overflow is detected (which yields a value of None in the case of ints and uints anyway).
This is my first contribution to Rust, and my first time using the language in general, so any and all feedback is appreciated.
This is a reopening of the libuv-upgrade part of #8645. Hopefully this won't
cause random segfaults all over the place. The windows regression in testing
should also be fixed (it shouldn't build the whole compiler twice).
A notable difference from before is that gyp is now a git submodule instead of
always git-cloned at make time. This allows bundling for releases more easily.
Closes#8850
This exposes a very simple function for resolving host names. There's a lot more that needs to be done, but this is probably enough for servo to get started connecting to real websites again.
(cc: #3227)
Parts I'm unsure about and would like a reviewer to look at are:
* `pub trait GenericPath : Clone + Eq + ToStr` -- is this the done thing? I've never done trait inheritance before, let alone from multiple traits, but it seemed to be necessary to be able to call all the methods we have to be able to call on `self`.
* changing the argument of `components` from `self` to `&self`, and having it return `self.components.clone()` instead of `self.components`; this was necessary to avoid move errors, but I'm not sure if it's the right thing. (The default methods impls now all have to call `self.components()` instead of just referencing the field `self.components`.)
Reject codepoints \uD800 to \uDFFF which are the surrogates
(reserved/unused codepoints that are invalid to encode into UTF-8)
The surrogates is the only hole of invalid codepoints in the range from
\u0 to \u10FFFF.
A [dialogue](https://github.com/mozilla/rust/pull/8909#discussion-diff-6102725) on PR #8909 inspired me to make this change.
r? anyone
(It is possible that `std::path` itself will soon be replaced with a new implementation that kballard's working on, as mentioned in the dialogue linked above, but this revision is simple enough that I figured I'd offer it up.)
An iterator that simply calls `.read_bytes()` each iteration.
I think choosing to own the Reader value and implementing Decorator to
allow extracting it is the most generically useful. The Reader type
variable can of course be some kind of reference type that implements
Reader.
In the generic form the `Bytes` iterator is well behaved itself and does not read ahead.
It performs abysmally on top of a FileStream, and much better if a buffering reader is inserted inbetween.
Note that I left dirname as returning ~str, because both of its
implementations work by calling dir_path, which produces a new path,
and thus we cannot borrow the result from &'a self passed to dirname
(because the new path returned by dir_path will not live long enough
to satisfy the lifetime 'a).
We already do this for libstd tests automatically, and compiletest runs into the
same problems where when forking lots of processes lots of file descriptors are
created. On OSX we can use specific syscalls to raise the limits, in this
situation, though.
Closes#8904
