So, some context for this, well, more a story. I'm not used to scripting, I've never really scripted anything, even if it's a valuable skill. I just never really needed it. Now, `@flip1995` correctly suggested using a script for this in `rust-clippy#7813`...
And I decided to write a script using nushell because why not? This was a mistake... I spend way more time on this than I would like to admit. It has definitely been more than 4 hours. It shouldn't take that long, but me being new to scripting and nushell just wasn't a good mixture... Anyway, here is the script that creates another script which adds the versions. Fun...
Just execute this on the `gh-pages` branch and the resulting `replacer.sh` in `clippy_lints` and it should all work.
```nu
mv v0.0.212 rust-1.00.0;
mv beta rust-1.57.0;
mv master rust-1.58.0;
let paths = (open ./rust-1.58.0/lints.json | select id id_span | flatten | select id path);
let versions = (
ls | where name =~ "rust-" | select name | format {name}/lints.json |
each { open $it | select id | insert version $it | str substring "5,11" version} |
group-by id | rotate counter-clockwise id version |
update version {get version | first 1} | flatten | select id version);
$paths | each { |row|
let version = ($versions | where id == ($row.id) | format {version})
let idu = ($row.id | str upcase)
$"sed -i '0,/($idu),/{s/pub ($idu),/#[clippy::version = "($version)"]\n pub ($idu),/}' ($row.path)"
} | str collect ";" | str find-replace --all '1.00.0' 'pre 1.29.0' | save "replacer.sh";
```
And this still has some problems, but at this point I just want to be done -.-
Found with https://github.com/est31/warnalyzer.
Dubious changes:
- Is anyone else using rustc_apfloat? I feel weird completely deleting
x87 support.
- Maybe some of the dead code in rustc_data_structures, in case someone
wants to use it in the future?
- Don't change rustc_serialize
I plan to scrap most of the json module in the near future (see
https://github.com/rust-lang/compiler-team/issues/418) and fixing the
tests needed more work than I expected.
TODO: check if any of the comments on the deleted code should be kept.
StructField -> FieldDef ("field definition")
Field -> ExprField ("expression field", not "field expression")
FieldPat -> PatField ("pattern field", not "field pattern")
Also rename visiting and other methods working on them.
For consistency with `Attribute::has_name` which doesn't mark the attribute as used either.
Replace all uses of `check_name` with `has_name` outside of rustc
