These functions are for working with a string representation of the path
even if it's not UTF-8 encoded. They replace invalid UTF-8 sequences
with the replacement char.
As documented in #7225, we cannot rely on paths being representable in
utf-8. Specifically, Linux allows anything (besides NUL) in a path.
Redesign GenericPath in light of this.
PosixPath hasn't been reimplemented yet for ~[u8].
This is causing really awful scheduler behavior where the main thread scheduler is
continually waking up, stealing work, discovering it can't actually run the work,
and sending it off to another scheduler.
r? anyone.
You can see a bit more discussion on #7655.
This does not close any ticket; I am just scratching an itch. Note in particular that I picked the value `{:>9} ns/iter` pretty much out of a hat. :)
(scratching an itch.)
Rebased and updated.
Fixed bug: omitted field init from embedded struct literal in a test.
Fixed bug: int underflow during padding length calculation.
In addition, the renderer will add comments to structs and enums saying
that fields or variants have been stripped.
The comments are currently
```rust
// some fields stripped
// some variants stripped
```
I was thinking of changing that to "some private..." but passes other than
strip-private may strip fields or variants as well.
cc @alexcrichton
This adds `get_opt` to `std::vec`, which looks up an item by index and returns an `Option`. If the given index is out of range, `None` will be returned, otherwise a `Some`-wrapped item will be returned.
Example use case:
```rust
use std::os;
fn say_hello(name: &str) {
println(fmt!("Hello, %s", name));
}
fn main(){
// Try to get the first cmd line arg, but default to "World"
let args = os::args();
let default = ~"World";
say_hello(*args.get_opt(1).unwrap_or(&default));
}
```
If there's an existing way of implementing this pattern that's cleaner, I'll happily close this. I'm also open to naming suggestions (`index_opt`?)
Example:
void ({ i64, %tydesc*, i8*, i8*, i8 }*, i64*, %"struct.std::fmt::Formatter[#1]"*)*
Before, we would print 20 levels deep due to recursion in the type
definition.
r? @metajack When I started writing the rustpkg tests, task failure didn't set the
exit code properly. But bblum's work from July fixed that. Hooray! I
just didn't know about it till now.
So, now rustpkg uses exit codes in a more conventional way, and some of
the tests are simpler.
The bigger issue will be to make task failure propagate the error message.
Right now, rustpkg does most of the work in separate tasks, which means if
a task fails, rustpkg can't distinguish between different types of failure
(see #3408)
Example:
void ({ i64, %tydesc*, i8*, i8*, i8 }*, i64*, %"struct.std::fmt::Formatter[#1]"*)*
Before, we would print 20 levels deep due to recursion in the type
definition.
When I started writing the rustpkg tests, task failure didn't set the
exit code properly. But bblum's work from July fixed that. Hooray! I
just didn't know about it till now.
So, now rustpkg uses exit codes in a more conventional way, and some of
the tests are simpler.
The bigger issue will be to make task failure propagate the error message.
Right now, rustpkg does most of the work in separate tasks, which means if
a task fails, rustpkg can't distinguish between different types of failure
(see #3408)
This patch removes the code responsible for handling older CrateMap versions (as discussed during #9593). Only the new (safer) layout is supported now.
