This lets us detect more complex situations: `async { x.await }` is
simplified into `x` if:
- `x` is an expression without side-effect
- or `x` is an async block itself
In both cases, no part of the `async` expression can be part of a macro
expansion.
Remove the `NodeId` of `ast::ExprKind::Async`
This is a followup to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/104833#pullrequestreview-1314537416.
In my original attempt, I was using `LoweringContext::expr`, which was not correct as it creates a fresh `DefId`.
It now uses the correct `DefId` for the wrapping `Expr`, and also makes forwarding `#[track_caller]` attributes more explicit.
Do not propose to remove `async move` if variables are captured by ref
Fixes#10482
changelog: FP [`redundant_async_block`] Do not propose to remove `async move` if variables are captured by ref
The dogfood success condition was inverted in `tests/dogfood.rs`:
```rust
assert!(!failed_packages.is_empty(), …);
```
while instead the `failed_packages` collection must be empty:
```rust
assert!(failed_packages.is_empty(), …);
```
And indeed, several clippy lint source files were not clean and had to be
fixed in the process.
