The sytax tree output files now use .rast extension
(rust-analyzer syntax tree or rust abstract syntax tree
(whatever)).
This format has a editors/code/ra_syntax_tree.tmGrammar.json declaration
that supplies nice syntax highlighting for .rast files.
3843: Remove rustc_lexer dependency in favour of rustc-ap-rustc_lexer r=est31 a=est31
The latter is auto-published on a regular schedule (Right now weekly).
See also https://github.com/alexcrichton/rustc-auto-publish
Co-authored-by: est31 <MTest31@outlook.com>
3829: Adds to SSR match for semantically equivalent call and method call r=matklad a=mikhail-m1
#3186
maybe I've missed some corner cases, but it works in general
Co-authored-by: Mikhail Modin <mikhailm1@gmail.com>
In textmate, keyword.control is used for all kinds of things; in fact,
the default scope mapping for keyword is keyword.control!
So let's add a less ambiguous controlFlow modifier
See Microsoft/vscode#94367
The big change here is counting binders, not
variables (https://github.com/rust-lang/chalk/pull/360). We have to adapt to the
same scheme for our `Ty::Bound`. It's mostly fine though, even makes some things
more clear.
We treat macro calls as expressions (there's appropriate Into impl),
which causes problem if there's expresison and non-expression macro in
the same node (like in the match arm).
We fix this problem by nesting macor patterns into another node (the
same way we nest path into PathExpr or PathPat). Ideally, we probably
should add a similar nesting for macro expressions, but that needs
some careful thinking about macros in blocks: `{ am_i_expression!() }`.
3746: Add create_function assist r=flodiebold a=TimoFreiberg
The function part of #3639, creating methods will come later
- [X] Function arguments
- [X] Function call arguments
- [x] Method call arguments
- [x] Literal arguments
- [x] Variable reference arguments
- [X] Migrate to `ast::make` API
Done, but there are some ugly spots.
Issues to handle in another PR:
- function reference arguments: Their type isn't printed properly right now.
The "insert explicit type" assist has the same issue and this is probably a relatively rare usecase.
- generating proper names for all kinds of argument expressions (if, loop, ...?)
Without this, it's totally possible for the assist to generate invalid argument names.
I think the assist it's already helpful enough to be shipped as it is, at least for me the main usecase involves passing in named references.
Besides, the Rust tooling ecosystem is immature enough that some janky behaviour in a new assist probably won't scare anyone off.
- select the generated placeholder body so it's a bit easier to overwrite it
- create method (`self.foo<|>(..)` or `some_foo.foo<|>(..)`) instead of create_function.
The main difference would be finding (or creating) the impl block and inserting the `self` argument correctly
- more specific default arg names for literals.
So far, every generated argument whose name can't be taken from the call site is called `arg` (with a number suffix if necessary).
- creating functions in another module of the same crate.
E.g. when typing `some_mod::foo<|>(...)` when in `lib.rs`, I'd want to have `foo` generated in `some_mod.rs` and jump there.
Issues: the mod could exist in `some_mod.rs`, in `lib.rs` as `mod some_mod`, or inside another mod but be imported via `use other_mod::some_mod`.
- refer to arguments of the generated function with a qualified path if the types aren't imported yet
(alternative: run autoimport. i think starting with a qualified path is cleaner and there's already an assist to replace a qualified path with an import and an unqualified path)
- add type arguments of the arguments to the generated function
- Autocomplete functions with information from unresolved calls (see https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/3746#issuecomment-605281323)
Issues: see https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/3746#issuecomment-605282542. The unresolved call could be anywhere. But just offering this autocompletion for unresolved calls in the same module would already be cool.
Co-authored-by: Timo Freiberg <timo.freiberg@gmail.com>
3814: Add impl From for enum variant assist r=flodiebold a=mattyhall
Basically adds a From impl for tuple enum variants with one field. It was recommended to me on the zulip to maybe try using the trait solver, but I had trouble with that as, although it could resolve the trait impl, it couldn't resolve the variable unambiguously in real use. I'm also unsure of how it would work if there were already multiple From impls to resolve - I can't see a way we could get more than one solution to my query.
Fixes#3766
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hall <matthew@quickbeam.me.uk>
This commit is a fixup of a bug I introduced by using a PackageId to refer to a crate when its name conflicts with a dependency.
It turns out the package id currently is `name version path` while cargo expects `name:version` as argument.
Basically adds a From impl for tuple enum variants with one field. Added
to cover the fairly common case of implementing your own Error that can
be created from another one, although other use cases exist.
3806: lower bool literal value r=flodiebold a=JoshMcguigan
Following up on #3805, this PR adds the literal value to `ast::LiteralKind` so when we lower we can use the actual value from the source code rather than the default value for the type. Ultimately I plan to use this for exhaustiveness checking in #3706.
I didn't include this in the previous PR because I wasn't sure if it made sense to add this information to `ast::LiteralKind` or provide some other mechanism to get this from `ast::Literal`.
For now I've only implemented this for boolean literals, but I think it could be easily extended to other types. A possible exception to this are string literals, since we may not want to clone around an owned string to hold onto in `ast::LiteralKind`, and it'd be nice to avoid adding a generic lifetime as well. Perhaps we won't ever care about the actual value of a string literal?
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
3797: Don't show chaining hints for record literals and unit structs r=matklad a=lnicola
Fixes#3796
r? @Veetaha
Co-authored-by: Laurențiu Nicola <lnicola@dend.ro>
3805: lower literal patterns r=JoshMcguigan a=JoshMcguigan
While working on #3706 I discovered literal patterns weren't being lowered. This PR implements that lowering.
Questions for reviewers:
1. This re-uses the existing conversion from `ast::LiteralKind` to `Literal`, but `ast::LiteralKind` doesn't include information about the actual value of the literal, which causes `Literal` to be created with the default value for the type (rather than the actual value in the source code). Am I correct in thinking that we'd eventually want to change things in such a way that we could initialize the `Literal` with the actual literal value? Is there an existing issue for this, or else perhaps I should create one to discuss how it should be implemented? My main question would be whether `ast::LiteralKind` should be extended to hold the actual value, or if we should provide some other way to get that information from `ast::Literal`?
2. I couldn't find tests which directly cover this, but it does seem to work in #3706. Do we have unit tests for this lowering code?
3. I'm not sure why `lit.literal()` returns an `Option`. Is returning a `Pat::Missing` in the `None` case the right thing to do?
4. I was basically practicing type-system driven development to figure out the transformation from `ast::Pat::LiteralPat` to `Pat::Lit`. I don't have an immediate question here, but I just wanted to ensure this section is looked at closely during review.
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
3780: Simplify r=matklad a=Veetaha
I absolutely love tha fact that removing `.clone()` simplifies the code comparing to other languages where it's actually the contrary (ahem ~~`std::move()`~~)
3787: vscode: add syntax tree inspection hovers and highlights r=matklad a=Veetaha
I implemented the reverse mapping (when you hover in the rust editor), but it seems overcomplicated, so I removed it
Related #3682
Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
3778: Use more functional programming in ArenaMap::insert r=matklad a=kjeremy
I find this more readable and it flattens out the body a little. Others may disagree.
Co-authored-by: kjeremy <kjeremy@gmail.com>
3781: Add crate versions when running cargo -p commands. r=matklad a=o0Ignition0o
If someone (unfortunately) creates a project that happens to have the same name as one of its (future) dependencies, there is [a way for them to change the dependency's alias in the Cargo.toml file](https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/specifying-dependencies.html#renaming-dependencies-in-cargotoml), to mitigate the name conflict. Unfortunately cargo -p commands don't seem to pick it up, which seems to put rust-analyzer run commands in a tough situation:
```
> Executing task: cargo test --package config --example default -- tests --nocapture <
error: There are multiple `config` packages in your project, and the specification `config` is ambiguous.
Please re-run this command with `-p <spec>` where `<spec>` is one of the following:
config:0.1.0
config:0.9.3
The terminal process terminated with exit code: 101
```
cargo suggests us to be more specific and refer to a package by its name and version, which this PR achieves.
I passed the version as a String because I don't really understand how the ra_db types work, but I would love to switch it to [a fully fledged Version type](https://steveklabnik.github.io/semver/semver/index.html) if you guide me towards that :)
Co-authored-by: o0Ignition0o <jeremy.lempereur@gmail.com>
Until now cargo commands with the -p flag would pass the package name only.
It doesn't play super well with the toml Renaming dependencies feature.
This commit specifies the package name and version when a cargo command is run with the -p flag,
to avoid ambiguities.
This commit changes the parser to attach doc-comments to the corresponding declaration in case there are newlines in between the doc-comment and the declaration.
3761: Append new match arms rather than replacing all of them r=matklad a=mattyhall
This means we now retain comments when filling in match arms. This fixes#3687. This is my first contribution so apologies if it needs a rethink! I think in particular the way I find the position to append to and remove_if_only_whitespace are a little hairy.
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hall <matthew@quickbeam.me.uk>
3727: Introduce ra_proc_macro r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR implemented:
1. Reading dylib path of proc-macro crate from cargo check , similar to how `OUTDIR` is obtained.
2. Added a new crate `ra_proc_macro` and implement the foot-work for reading result from external proc-macro expander.
3. Added a struct `ProcMacroClient` , which will be responsible to the client side communication to the External process.
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3722: Fix parsing lambdas with return type r=matklad a=matklad
We should eat only a single block, and not whatever larger expression
may start with a block.
closes#3721
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
3707: Add ItemScope::visibility_of r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
~This PR implements `HasVisibility` for various constructs and change `Definition::search_scope` to use `Visibility` directly instead of depends on ad-hoc string parsing.~
This PR added `visibility_of` in `ItemScope` and `Module` and use it directly directly instead of depends on ad-hoc string parsing.
And also add a FIXME to indicate that there is a bug which do not search child-submodules in other files recursively in `Definition::search_scope`.
I will submit another PR to fix that bug after this is merged.
cc @flodiebold
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3664: Introduce TokenConverter Trait r=matklad a=edwin0cheng
This PR add a `TokenConverter` Trait to share the conversion logic between raw `lexer` token and Syntax Node Token.
Related #2158.
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3700: fill match arms with empty block rather than unit tuple r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
As requested by @Veetaha in #3689 and #3687, this modifies the fill match arms assist to create match arms as an empty block `{}` rather than a unit tuple `()`.
In one test I left one of the pre-existing match arms as a unit tuple, and added a body to another match arm, to demonstrate that the contents of existing match arms persist.
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
3696: vscode: more type safety r=matklad a=Veetaha
3698: Consider references when applying postfix completions r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
Sometimes my RA debugging workflow breaks because `.dbg` is applied to the variable that is used later in the code.
It's safer to consider the refences to avoid this for completions that may trigger the move.
3703: Don't try to enable proposed API's on stable r=matklad a=matklad
bors r+
🤖
Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
3689: implement fill match arm assist for tuple of enums r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
This updates the fill match arm assist to work in cases where the user is matching on a tuple of enums.
Note, for now this does not apply when some match arms exist (other than the trivial `_`), but I think this could be added in the future.
I think this also lays the groundwork for filling match arms when matching on tuples of non-enum values, for example a tuple of an enum and a boolean.
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
3632: ra_cargo_watch: log errors r=matklad a=Veetaha
Until this moment we totally ignored all the errors from cargo process. Though this is still true, but we
now try to log ones that are critical (i.e. misconfiguration errors and ignore compile errors).
This fixes#3631, and gives us a better error message to more gracefully handle the #3265
Though I think that outputting this only to `Output` channel is not enough. We should somehow warn the user that he passed wrong arguments to `cargo-watch.args`. I didn't bother looking for how to do this now, but this PR at least gives us something.
*cc* @kiljacken @matklad
Co-authored-by: veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Veetaha <veetaha2@gmail.com>
As stated by matklad, reading the stderr
should be done alngside with
stdout via select() (or I guess poll()),
there is no such implementation in stdlib,
since it is quite low level and platform-dependent and it
also requires quite a bit of unrelated code we don't use it for now.
As referenced by bjorn3, there is an implementation of the needed read2() function
in rustc compiletest. The better solution will be to extract this function
to a separate crate in future:
https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/3632#discussion_r395605298
3671: Add identity expansion checking in ill-form expansion r=flodiebold a=edwin0cheng
This PR try to add more checking code in error case in macro expansion. The bug in #3642 is introduced by #3580 , which allow ill-form macro expansion in *all* kind of macro expansions.
In general we should separate hypothetical macro expansion and the actual macro expansion call. However, currently the `Semantic` workflow we are using only support single macro expansion type, we might want to review it and make it works in both ways. (Maybe add a field in `MacroCallLoc` for differentiation)
Fix#3642
Co-authored-by: Edwin Cheng <edwin0cheng@gmail.com>
3623: 'Fill match arms' should work with existing match arms r=matklad a=slyngbaek
Addresses #3039
This essentially adds missing match arms. The algorithm for this
can get complicated rather quickly so bail in certain conditions
and rely on a PlaceholderPat.
The algorighm works as such:
- Iterate through the Enum Def Variants
- Attempt to see if the variant already exists as a match arm
- If yes, skip the enum variant. If no, include it.
- If it becomes complicated, rather than exhaustively deal with every
branch, mark it as a "partial match" and simply include the
placeholder.
Conditions for "complication":
- The match arm contains a match guard
- Any kind of nested destrucuring
Order the resulting merged match branches as such:
1. Provided match arms
2. Missing enum variant branch arms
3. End with Placeholder if required
- Add extra tests
Co-authored-by: Steffen Lyngbaek <steffenlyngbaek@gmail.com>
Iterate through TupleStructPat's until a MatchArm if
one exists. Store in a new is_pat_bind_and_path bool
and allow the `complete_scope` to find matches.
Added some tests to ensure it works in simple and nested cases.
Addresses #3039
This essentially adds missing match arms. The algorithm for this
can get complicated rather quickly so bail in certain conditions
and rely on a PlaceholderPat.
The algorighm works as such:
- Iterate through the Enum Def Variants
- Attempt to see if the variant already exists as a match arm
- If yes, skip the enum variant. If no, include it.
- If it becomes complicated, rather than exhaustively deal with every
branch, mark it as a "partial match" and simply include the
placeholder.
Conditions for "complication":
- The match arm contains a match guard
- Any kind of nested destrucuring
Order the resulting merged match branches as such:
1. Provided match arms
2. Missing enum variant branch arms
3. End with Placeholder if required
- Add extra tests
It improves compile time in `--release` mode quite a bit, it doesn't
really slow things down and, conceptually, it seems closer to what we
want the physical architecture to look like (we don't want to
monomorphise EVERYTHING in a single leaf crate).
3573: Check all crates of the workspace r=matklad a=matklad
Previously, if the root of the was was a real crate, only this crate
was checked.
Ideally, we might want some kind of config here (which might be just
overriding the whole command), but `--workspace` is def a nicer
default.
r? @kiljacken
Co-authored-by: Aleksey Kladov <aleksey.kladov@gmail.com>
3587: Use WorkDoneProgress LSP API for initial load r=matklad a=slyngbaek
Addresses #3283
Rather than using custom UI for showing the loaded state. Rely
on the WorkDoneProgress API in 3.15.0
https://microsoft.github.io/language-server-protocol/specification#workDoneProgress.
No client-side work was necessary. The UI is not exactly what is
described in the issue but afaict that's how VS Code implements the LSP
API.
- The WorkDoneProgressEnd does not appear to display its message
contents (controlled by vscode)
Co-authored-by: Steffen Lyngbaek <steffenlyngbaek@gmail.com>
