6650: Make completion and assists module independent r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
A follow-up of https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/pull/6553#discussion_r524402907
Move the common code for both assists and completion modules into a separate crate.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
6553: Auto imports in completion r=matklad a=SomeoneToIgnore
Closes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/1062 but does not handle the completion order, since it's a separate task for https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4922 , https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/4922 and maybe something else.
2 quirks in the current implementation:
* traits are not auto imported during method completion
If I understand the current situation right, we cannot search for traits by a **part** of a method name, we need a full name with correct case to get a trait for it.
* VSCode (?) autocompletion is not as rigid as in Intellij Rust as you can notice on the animation.
Intellij is able to refresh the completions on every new symbol added, yet VS Code does not query the completions on every symbol for me.
With a few debug prints placed in RA, I've observed the following behaviour: after the first set of completion suggestions is received, next symbol input does not trigger a server request, if the completions contain this symbol.
When more symbols added, the existing completion suggestions are filtered out until none are left and only then, on the next symbol it queries for completions.
It seems like the only alternative to get an updated set of results is to manually retrigger it with Esc and Ctrl + Space.
Despite the eerie latter bullet, the completion seems to work pretty fine and fast nontheless, but if you have any ideas on how to make it more smooth, I'll gladly try it out.
Co-authored-by: Kirill Bulatov <mail4score@gmail.com>
6524: Add support for loading rustc private crates r=matklad a=xldenis
This PR presents a solution to the problem of making`rustc_private` crates visible to `rust-analyzer`.
Currently developers add dependencies to those crates behind a `cfg(NOT_A_TARGET)` target to prevent `cargo` from building them.
This solution is unsatisfactory since it requires modifying `Cargo.toml` and causes problems for collaboration or CI.
The proposed solution suggested by @matklad is to allow users to give RA a path where the `rustc` sources could be found and then load that like a normal workspace.
This PR implements this solution by adding a `rustcSource` configuration item and adding the cargo metadata to the crate graph if it is provided.
------
I have no idea how this should be tested, or if this code is generally tested at all. I've locally run the extension with these changes and it correctly loads the relevant crates on a `rustc_private` project of mine.
Co-authored-by: Xavier Denis <xldenis@gmail.com>
Historically, we intentinally violated JSON-RPC spec here by hard
crashing. The idea was to poke both the clients and servers to fix
stuff.
However, this is confusing for server implementors, and falls down in
one important place -- protocol extension are not always backwards
compatible, which causes crashes simply due to version mismatch. We
had once such case with our own extension, and one for semantic
tokens.
So let's be less adventerous and just err on the err side!
6331: correct hover text for items with doc attribute with raw strings r=matklad a=JoshMcguigan
Fixes#6300 by improving the handling of raw string literals in attribute style doc comments.
This still has a bug where it could consume too many `"` at the start or end of the comment text, just as the original code had. Not sure if we want to fix that as part of this PR or not? If so, I think I'd prefer to add a unit test for either the `as_simple_key_value` function (I'm not exactly sure where this would belong / how to set this up) or create a `fn(&SmolStr) -> &SmolStr` to unit test by factoring out the `trim` operations from `as_simple_key_value`. Thoughts on this?
6342: Shorter dependency chain r=matklad a=popzxc
Continuing implementing suggestions from the `Completion refactoring` zulip thread.
This PR does the following:
- Removes dependency of `completions` on `assists` by moving required functionality into `ide_db`.
- Moves completely `call_info` crate into `ide_db` as it looks like it fits perfect there.
- Adds a bunch of new tests and docs.
- Adds the re-export of `base_db` to the `ide_db` and removes direct dependency on `base_db` from other crates.
The last point is controversial, I guess, but I noticed that in places where `ide_db` is used, `base_db` is also *always* used. Thus I think the dependency on the `base_db` is implied by the fact of `ide_db` interfaces, and thus it makes sense to just provide `base_db` out of the box.
Co-authored-by: Josh Mcguigan <joshmcg88@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Igor Aleksanov <popzxc@yandex.ru>
