Parse inner attributes on inline const block
According to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/84414#issuecomment-826150936, inner attributes are intended to be supported *"in all containers for statements (or some subset of statements)"*.
This PR adds inner attribute parsing and pretty-printing for inline const blocks (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76001), which contain statements just like an unsafe block or a loop body.
```rust
let _ = const {
#![allow(...)]
let x = ();
x
};
```
Fix `x test --doc --stage 0 library/std`
I managed to break this in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95449.
I am not quite sure why this is the correct fix, but it doesn't break `doc --stage 0`
and is strictly closer to the previous behavior.
Previously, rustdoc would error with strange issues because of the mismatched sysroot:
```
error[E0460]: found possibly newer version of crate `std` which `rustc_span` depends on
--> /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/compiler/rustc_lint_defs/src/lib.rs:14:5
|
14 | use rustc_span::{sym, symbol::Ident, Span, Symbol};
| ^^^^^^^^^^
|
= note: perhaps that crate needs to be recompiled?
= note: the following crate versions were found:
crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.rlib
crate `std`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0/lib/rustlib/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/lib/libstd-ff9290e971253a38.so
crate `rustc_span`: /home/jnelson/rust-lang/rust/build/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/stage0-rustc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/release/deps/librustc_span-ed11dce30c1766f9.rlib
```
Make some `usize`-typed masks definitions agnostic to the size of `usize`
Some masks where defined as
```rust
const NONASCII_MASK: usize = 0x80808080_80808080u64 as usize;
```
where it was assumed that `usize` is never wider than 64, which is currently true.
To make those constants valid in a hypothetical 128-bit target, these constants have been redefined in an `usize`-width-agnostic way
```rust
const NONASCII_MASK: usize = usize::from_ne_bytes([0x80; size_of::<usize>()]);
```
There are already some cases where Rust anticipates the possibility of supporting 128-bit targets, such as not implementing `From<usize>` for `u64`.
clarify doc(cfg) wording
The current "This is supported" wording implies that it's possible to
still use the item on other configurations, but in an unsupported way.
Changing this to "Available" removes this ambiguity.
docs: add link from zip to unzip
The docs for `Iterator::unzip` explain that it is kind of an inverse operation to `Iterator::zip` and guide the reader to the `zip` docs, but the `zip` docs don't let the user know that they can undo the `zip` operation with `unzip`. This change modifies the docs to help the user find `unzip`.
Update GitHub Actions actions/checkout Version v2 -> v3
Update `actions/checkout@v2` to `actions/checkout@v3` because of Node12 will be out of life after Aril 30, 2022 [[Reference](https://nodejs.org/en/about/releases/)].
`actions/xxxx@v3` use Node16 whose support lasts until April 30, 2024.
resolve: Create dummy bindings for all unresolved imports
Apparently such bindings weren't previously created for all unresolved imports, causing issues like https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95879.
In this PR I'm trying to create such dummy bindings in a more centralized way by calling `import_dummy_binding` once for all imports in `finalize_imports`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95879.
Allow self-profiler to only record potentially costly arguments when argument recording is turned on
As discussed [on zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/247081-t-compiler.2Fperformance/topic/Identifying.20proc-macro.20slowdowns/near/277304909) with `@wesleywiser,` I'd like to record proc-macro expansions in the self-profiler, with some detailed data (per-expansion spans for example, to follow #95473).
At the same time, I'd also like to avoid doing expensive things when tracking a generic activity's arguments, if they were not specifically opted into the event filter mask, to allow the self-profiler to be used in hotter contexts.
This PR tries to offer:
- a way to ensure a closure to record arguments will only be called in that situation, so that potentially costly arguments can still be recorded when needed. With the additional requirement that, if possible, it would offer a way to record non-owned data without adding many `generic_activity_with_arg_{...}`-style methods. This lead to the `generic_activity_with_arg_recorder` single entry-point, and the closure parameter would offer the new methods, able to be executed in a context where costly argument could be created without disturbing the profiled piece of code.
- some facilities/patterns allowing to record more rustc specific data in this situation, without making `rustc_data_structures` where the self-profiler is defined, depend on other rustc crates (causing circular dependencies): in particular, spans. They are quite tricky to turn into strings (if the default `Debug` impl output does not match the context one needs them for), and since I'd also like to avoid the allocation there when arg recording is turned off today, that has turned into another flexibility requirement for the API in this PR (separating the span-specific recording into an extension trait). **edit**: I've removed this from the PR so that it's easier to review, and opened https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95739.
- allow for extensibility in the future: other ways to record arguments, or additional data attached to them could be added in the future (e.g. recording the argument's name as well as its data).
Some areas where I'd love feedback:
- the API and names: the `EventArgRecorder` and its method for example. As well as the verbosity that comes from the increased flexibility.
- if I should convert the existing `generic_activity_with_arg{s}` to just forward to `generic_activity_with_arg_recorder` + `recorder.record_arg` (or remove them altogether ? Probably not): I've used the new API in the simple case I could find of allocating for an arg that may not be recorded, and the rest don't seem costly.
- [x] whether this API should panic if no arguments were recorded by the user-provided closure (like this PR currently does: it seems like an error to use an API dedicated to record arguments but not call the methods to then do so) or if this should just record a generic activity without arguments ?
- whether the `record_arg` function should be `#[inline(always)]`, like the `generic_activity_*` functions ?
As mentioned, r? `@wesleywiser` following our recent discussion.
Adding diagnostic data on generators to the crate metadata and using it to provide
a better diagnostic on failure to meet send bound on futures originated from a foreign crate
Rollup of 9 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #93969 (Only add codegen backend to dep info if -Zbinary-dep-depinfo is used)
- #94605 (Add missing links in platform support docs)
- #95372 (make unaligned_references lint deny-by-default)
- #95859 (Improve diagnostics for unterminated nested block comment)
- #95961 (implement SIMD gather/scatter via vector getelementptr)
- #96004 (Consider lifetimes when comparing types for equality in MIR validator)
- #96050 (Remove some now-dead code that was only relevant before deaggregation.)
- #96070 ([test] Add test cases for untested functions for BTreeMap)
- #96099 (MaybeUninit array cleanup)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
This updates the `openssl` and `openssl-sys` crates to support building
the toolchain with system libraries up to LibreSSL 3.4.x.
LibreSSL 3.4.0 has been supported since `openssl-sys` version 0.9.67,
LibreSSL 3.4.x since `openssl-sys` 0.9.72.
Better method call error messages
Rebase/continuation of #71827
~Based on #92360~
~Based on #93118~
There's a decent description in #71827 that I won't copy here (for now at least)
In addition to rebasing, I've tried to restore most of the original suggestions for invalid arguments. Unfortunately, this does make some of the errors a bit verbose. To fix this will require a bit of refactoring to some of the generalized error suggestion functions, and I just don't have the time to go into it right now.
I think this is in a state that the error messages are overall better than before without a reduction in the suggestions given.
~I've tried to split out some of the easier and self-contained changes into separate commits (mostly in #92360, but also one here). There might be more than can be done here, but again just lacking time.~
r? `@estebank` as the original reviewer of #71827
This attempts to bring better error messages to invalid method calls, by applying some heuristics to identify common mistakes.
The algorithm is inspired by Levenshtein distance and longest common sub-sequence. In essence, we treat the types of the function, and the types of the arguments you provided as two "words" and compute the edits to get from one to the other.
We then modify that algorithm to detect 4 cases:
- A function input is missing
- An extra argument was provided
- The type of an argument is straight up invalid
- Two arguments have been swapped
- A subset of the arguments have been shuffled
(We detect the last two as separate cases so that we can detect two swaps, instead of 4 parameters permuted.)
It helps to understand this argument by paying special attention to terminology: "inputs" refers to the inputs being *expected* by the function, and "arguments" refers to what has been provided at the call site.
The basic sketch of the algorithm is as follows:
- Construct a boolean grid, with a row for each argument, and a column for each input. The cell [i, j] is true if the i'th argument could satisfy the j'th input.
- If we find an argument that could satisfy no inputs, provided for an input that can't be satisfied by any other argument, we consider this an "invalid type".
- Extra arguments are those that can't satisfy any input, provided for an input that *could* be satisfied by another argument.
- Missing inputs are inputs that can't be satisfied by any argument, where the provided argument could satisfy another input
- Swapped / Permuted arguments are identified with a cycle detection algorithm.
As each issue is found, we remove the relevant inputs / arguments and check for more issues. If we find no issues, we match up any "valid" arguments, and start again.
Note that there's a lot of extra complexity:
- We try to stay efficient on the happy path, only computing the diagonal until we find a problem, and then filling in the rest of the matrix.
- Closure arguments are wrapped in a tuple and need to be unwrapped
- We need to resolve closure types after the rest, to allow the most specific type constraints
- We need to handle imported C functions that might be variadic in their inputs.
I tried to document a lot of this in comments in the code and keep the naming clear.
MaybeUninit array cleanup
* Links `MaybeUninit::uninit_array` to meta-tracking issue
* Links `MaybeUninit::array_assume_init` to meta-tracking issue
* Unstably constifies `MaybeUninit::array_assume_init`
Another thing worth mentioning: this splits the const feature flag for `maybe_uninit_uninit_array` into `const_maybe_uninit_uninit_array` to avoid weird cases where only one gets stabilised.
Note that it may be desired to keep the `array_assume_init` method linked to its dedicated issue, but at least for now, I decided to link to the meta-tracking issue so that all of the methods lead users to the same place. But I can revert that bit if desired.
The meta-tracking issue that I filed is #96097.
Remove some now-dead code that was only relevant before deaggregation.
The code was broken anyway, if the deaggregator is disabled, it would have ICEd on any non-enum Adt
r? ```@RalfJung```
implement SIMD gather/scatter via vector getelementptr
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/portable-simd/issues/271
However, I don't *really* know what I am doing here... Cc ``@workingjubilee`` ``@calebzulawski``
I didn't do anything for cranelift -- ``@bjorn3`` not sure if it's okay for that backend to temporarily break. I'm happy to cherry-pick a patch that adds cranelift support. :)
Improve diagnostics for unterminated nested block comment
close#95283
(This is my first time try to messing around with rust compiler and might get a lot of things wrong... 🙇 )
make unaligned_references lint deny-by-default
This lint has been warn-by-default for a year now (since https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/82525), so I think it is time to crank it up a bit. Code that triggers the lint causes UB (without `unsafe`) when executed, so we really don't want people to write code like this.
Only add codegen backend to dep info if -Zbinary-dep-depinfo is used
I am currently migrating the cg_clif build system from using a binary linked to the codegen backend as rustc replacement to passing `-Zcodegen-backend` instead. Without this PR this would force cargo to rebuild the sysroot on any change to the codegen backend even if I explicitly specify that I want it to be preserved, which would make development of cg_clif a lot slower. If you still want to have changes to the codegen backend invalidate the cargo build cache you can explicitly specify `-Zbinary-dep-depinfo`.
cc ``@eddyb`` as the codegen backend was initially added to the depinfo for rust-gpu.
Implement sym operands for global_asm!
Tracking issue: #93333
This PR is pretty much a complete rewrite of `sym` operand support for inline assembly so that the same implementation can be shared by `asm!` and `global_asm!`. The main changes are:
- At the AST level, `sym` is represented as a special `InlineAsmSym` AST node containing a path instead of an `Expr`.
- At the HIR level, `sym` is split into `SymStatic` and `SymFn` depending on whether the path resolves to a static during AST lowering (defaults to `SynFn` if `get_early_res` fails).
- `SymFn` is just an `AnonConst`. It runs through typeck and we just collect the resulting type at the end. An error is emitted if the type is not a `FnDef`.
- `SymStatic` directly holds a path and the `DefId` of the `static` that it is pointing to.
- The representation at the MIR level is mostly unchanged. There is a minor change to THIR where `SymFn` is a constant instead of an expression.
- At the codegen level we need to apply the target's symbol mangling to the result of `tcx.symbol_name()` depending on the target. This is done by calling the LLVM name mangler, which handles all of the details.
- On Mach-O, all symbols have a leading underscore.
- On x86 Windows, different mangling is used for cdecl, stdcall, fastcall and vectorcall.
- No mangling is needed on other platforms.
r? `@nagisa`
cc `@eddyb`
The `vec!` macro has 3 rules, but two are not usable under
`no_global_oom_handling` builds of the standard library
(even with a zero size):
```rust
let _ = vec![42]; // Error: requires `exchange_malloc` lang_item.
let _ = vec![42; 0]; // Error: cannot find function `from_elem`.
```
Thus those two rules should not be available to begin with.
The remaining one, with an empty matcher, is just a shorthand for
`new()` and may not make as much sense to have alone, since the
idea behind `vec!` is to enable `Vec`s to be defined with the same
syntax as array expressions. Furthermore, the documentation can be
confusing since it shows the other rules.
Thus perhaps it is better and simpler to disable `vec!` entirely
under `no_global_oom_handling` environments, and let users call
`new()` instead:
```rust
let _: Vec<i32> = vec![];
let _: Vec<i32> = Vec::new();
```
Notwithstanding this, a `try_vec!` macro would be useful, such as
the one introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/95051.
If the shorthand for `new()` is deemed worth keeping on its own,
then it may be interesting to have a separate `vec!` macro with
a single rule and different, simpler documentation.
Signed-off-by: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>
Optimize RcInnerPtr::inc_strong()/inc_weak() instruction count
Inspired by this internals thread: https://internals.rust-lang.org/t/rc-optimization-on-64-bit-targets/16362
[The generated assembly is a bit smaller](https://rust.godbolt.org/z/TeTnf6144) and is a more efficient usage of the CPU's instruction cache. `unlikely` doesn't impact any of the small artificial tests I've done, but I've included it in case it might help more complex scenarios when this is inlined.
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #94457 (Stabilize `derive_default_enum`)
- #94461 (Create (unstable) 2024 edition)
- #94849 (Check var scope if it exist)
- #95194 (remove find_use_placement)
- #95749 (only downgrade selection Error -> Ambiguous if type error is in predicate)
- #96026 (couple of clippy::complexity fixes)
- #96027 (remove function parameters only used in recursion)
- #96034 ([test] Add test cases of untested functions for BTreeSet )
- #96040 (Use u32 instead of i32 for futexes.)
- #96062 (docs: Update tests chapter for Termination stabilization)
- #96065 (Refactor: Use `format-args-capture` and remove unnecessary nested blocks in rustc_typeck)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
docs: Update tests chapter for Termination stabilization
A small update for the docs of `#[test]` functions as a result of the `Termination` stabilization in #93840.
Use u32 instead of i32 for futexes.
This changes futexes from i32 to u32. The [Linux man page](https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/futex.2.html) uses `uint32_t` for them, so I'm not sure why I used i32 for them. Maybe because I first used them for thread parkers, where I used -1, 0, and 1 as the states.
(Wasm's `memory.atomic.wait32` does use `i32`, because wasm doesn't support `u32`.)
It doesn't matter much, but using the unsigned type probably results in fewer surprises when shifting bits around or using comparison operators.
r? ```@Amanieu```
