post-unboxed-closure-conversion. This requires a fair amount of
annoying coercions because all the `map` etc types are defined
generically over the `F`, so the automatic coercions don't propagate;
this is compounded by the need to use `let` and not `as` due to
stage0. That said, this pattern is to a large extent temporary and
unusual.
This patch marks `clone` stable, as well as the `Clone` trait, but
leaves `clone_from` unstable. The latter will be decided by the beta.
The patch also marks most manual implementations of `Clone` as stable,
except where the APIs are otherwise deprecated or where there is
uncertainty about providing `Clone`.
followed by a semicolon.
This allows code like `vec![1i, 2, 3].len();` to work.
This breaks code that uses macros as statements without putting
semicolons after them, such as:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b)
assert!(c == d)
println(...);
}
It also breaks code that uses macros as items without semicolons:
local_data_key!(foo)
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
Add semicolons to fix this code. Those two examples can be fixed as
follows:
fn main() {
...
assert!(a == b);
assert!(c == d);
println(...);
}
local_data_key!(foo);
fn main() {
println("hello world")
}
RFC #378.
Closes#18635.
[breaking-change]
In US english, "that" is used in restrictive clauses in place of
"which", and often affects the meaning of sentences.
In UK english and many dialects, no distinction is
made.
While Rust devs want to avoid unproductive pedanticism, it is worth at
least being uniform in documentation such as:
http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/index.html
and also in cases where correct usage of US english clarifies the
sentence.
closes#12677 (cc @Valloric)
cc #15294
r? @aturon / @alexcrichton
(Because of #19358 I had to move the struct bounds from the `where` clause into the parameter list)
In US english, "that" is used in restrictive clauses in place of
"which", and often affects the meaning of sentences.
In UK english and many dialects, no distinction is
made.
While Rust devs want to avoid unproductive pedanticism, it is worth at
least being uniform in documentation such as:
http://doc.rust-lang.org/std/iter/index.html
and also in cases where correct usage of US english clarifies the
sentence.
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures
and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly
copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for
MyType {}`.
A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn
you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have
implemented `Copy` but didn't.
For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using
`#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be
accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should
transition your code away from using it.
This breaks code like:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
Change this code to:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
impl Copy for Point2D {}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
This is the backwards-incompatible part of #13231.
Part of RFC #3.
[breaking-change]
In regards to:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/19253#issuecomment-64836729
This commit:
* Changes the #deriving code so that it generates code that utilizes fewer
reexports (in particur Option::* and Result::*), which is necessary to
remove those reexports in the future
* Changes other areas of the codebase so that fewer reexports are utilized
Added the example from [this Reddit thread][1], reworked to be more robust with correct logic (first link skipped the 0th and 1st Fibonacci numbers, second forgot about the last two valid values before overflow). Will yield all Fibonacci numbers sequentially in the range `[0, <u32 as Int>::max_value())`.
If the example is too complicated I can change it to a more naive version, perhaps using signed integers to check for overflow instead of `Option` and `.checked_add()`.
Also reworded the doc comments to clarify the usage and behavior of `Unfold`, as the thread suggested that it wasn't really clear how `Unfold` worked and when one should use it.
This change is in the `core` crate but I based the example on `std` since that's where most readers will find the example. I included a note about `core` for clarity. Edit: removed.
Tested with `rustdoc src/libcore/lib.rs`. Rebased against latest master as of the creation of this PR.
[1]: http://www.reddit.com/r/rust/comments/2ny8r1/a_question_about_loops/cmighu4?context=10000
This is an initial pass at stabilizing the `iter` module. The module is
fairly large, but is also pretty polished, so most of the stabilization
leaves things as they are.
Some changes:
* Due to the new object safety rules, various traits needs to be split
into object-safe traits and extension traits. This includes `Iterator`
itself. While splitting up the traits adds some complexity, it will
also increase flexbility: once we have automatic impls of `Trait` for
trait objects over `Trait`, then things like the iterator adapters
will all work with trait objects.
* Iterator adapters that use up the entire iterator now take it by
value, which makes the semantics more clear and helps catch bugs. Due
to the splitting of Iterator, this does not affect trait objects. If
the underlying iterator is still desired for some reason, `by_ref` can
be used. (Note: this change had no fallout in the Rust distro except
for the useless mut lint.)
* In general, extension traits new and old are following an [in-progress
convention](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/445). As such, they
are marked `unstable`.
* As usual, anything involving closures is `unstable` pending unboxed
closures.
* A few of the more esoteric/underdeveloped iterator forms (like
`RandomAccessIterator` and `MutableDoubleEndedIterator`, along with
various unfolds) are left experimental for now.
* The `order` submodule is left `experimental` because it will hopefully
be replaced by generalized comparison traits.
* "Leaf" iterators (like `Repeat` and `Counter`) are uniformly
constructed by free fns at the module level. That's because the types
are not otherwise of any significance (if we had `impl Trait`, you
wouldn't want to define a type at all).
Closes#17701
Due to renamings and splitting of traits, this is a:
[breaking-change]
This breaks code that referred to variant names in the same namespace as
their enum. Reexport the variants in the old location or alter code to
refer to the new locations:
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
=>
```
pub use self::Foo::{A, B};
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = A;
}
```
or
```
pub enum Foo {
A,
B
}
fn main() {
let a = Foo::A;
}
```
[breaking-change]
Spring cleaning is here! In the Fall! This commit removes quite a large amount
of deprecated functionality from the standard libraries. I tried to ensure that
only old deprecated functionality was removed.
This is removing lots and lots of deprecated features, so this is a breaking
change. Please consult the deprecation messages of the deleted code to see how
to migrate code forward if it still needs migration.
[breaking-change]
