Diagnostic derives have previously had to take special care when
ordering the generated code so that fields were not used after a move.
This is unlikely for most fields because a field is either annotated
with a subdiagnostic attribute and is thus likely a `Span` and copiable,
or is a argument, in which case it is only used once by `set_arg`
anyway.
However, format strings for code in suggestions can result in fields
being used after being moved if not ordered carefully. As a result, the
derive currently puts `set_arg` calls last (just before emission), such
as:
```rust
let diag = { /* create diagnostic */ };
diag.span_suggestion_with_style(
span,
fluent::crate::slug,
format!("{}", __binding_0),
Applicability::Unknown,
SuggestionStyle::ShowAlways
);
/* + other subdiagnostic additions */
diag.set_arg("foo", __binding_0);
/* + other `set_arg` calls */
diag.emit();
```
For eager translation, this doesn't work, as the message being
translated eagerly can assume that all arguments are available - so
arguments _must_ be set first.
Format strings for suggestion code are now separated into two parts - an
initialization line that performs the formatting into a variable, and a
usage in the subdiagnostic addition.
By separating these parts, the initialization can happen before
arguments are set, preserving the desired order so that code compiles,
while still enabling arguments to be set before subdiagnostics are
added.
```rust
let diag = { /* create diagnostic */ };
let __code_0 = format!("{}", __binding_0);
/* + other formatting */
diag.set_arg("foo", __binding_0);
/* + other `set_arg` calls */
diag.span_suggestion_with_style(
span,
fluent::crate::slug,
__code_0,
Applicability::Unknown,
SuggestionStyle::ShowAlways
);
/* + other subdiagnostic additions */
diag.emit();
```
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Add support for `eager` argument to the `subdiagnostic` attribute which
generates a call to `eager_subdiagnostic`.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Add variant of `DiagnosticMessage` for eagerly translated messages
(messages in the target language which don't need translated by the
emitter during emission). Also adds `eager_subdiagnostic` function which
is intended to be invoked by the diagnostic derive for subdiagnostic
fields which are marked as needing eager translation.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
`AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic_with` is similar to the previous
`AddToDiagnostic::add_to_diagnostic` but takes a function that can be
used by the caller to modify diagnostic messages originating from the
subdiagnostic (such as performing translation eagerly).
`add_to_diagnostic` now just calls `add_to_diagnostic_with` with an
empty closure.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Eager translation will enable subdiagnostics to be translated multiple
times with different arguments - this requires the ability to replace
the value of one argument with a new value, which is better suited to a
`HashMap` than the previous storage, a `Vec`.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Don't suggest moving tuple structs with a significant drop to late evaluation
fixes#9608
changelog: Don't suggest moving tuple structs with a significant drop to late evaluation
Currently we expand unmatched fragments by not replacing them at all,
leaving us with `$ident`. This trips up the parser or subsequent macro
calls. Instead it makes more sense to replace these with some reasonable
default depending on the fragment kind which should make more recursive
macro calls work better for completions.
slice: #[inline] a couple iterator methods.
The one I care about and actually saw in the wild not getting inlined is
clone(). We ended up doing a whole function call for something that just
copies two pointers.
I ended up marking as_slice / as_ref as well because make_slice is
inline(always) itself, and is also the kind of think that can kill
performance in hot loops if you expect it to get inlined. But happy to
undo those.
Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #99696 (Uplift `clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles` lint into rustc)
- #102055 (Move some tests to more reasonable directories)
- #102786 (Remove tuple candidate, nothing special about it)
- #102794 (Make tests capture the error printed by a Result return)
- #102853 (Skip chained OpaqueCast when building captures.)
- #102868 (Rename `AssocItemKind::TyAlias` to `AssocItemKind::Type`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Add convert_named_struct_to_tuple_struct assist
Closes#11643, since the assist for converting in the other direction is already there (I based most of the implementation and all of the tests on it).
Make tests capture the error printed by a Result return
An error returned by tests previously would get written directly to stderr, instead of to the capture buffer set up by the test harness. This PR makes it write to the capture buffer so that it can be integrated as part of the test output by build tools such as `buck test`, since being able to read the error message returned by a test is pretty critical to debugging why the test failed.
<br>
**Before:**
```rust
// tests/test.rs
#[test]
fn test() -> Result<(), &'static str> {
println!("STDOUT");
eprintln!("STDERR");
Err("RESULT")
}
```
```console
$ cargo build --test test
$ target/debug/deps/test-???????????????? -Z unstable-options --format=json
{ "type": "suite", "event": "started", "test_count": 1 }
{ "type": "test", "event": "started", "name": "test" }
Error: "RESULT"
{ "type": "test", "name": "test", "event": "failed", "stdout": "STDOUT\nSTDERR\n" }
{ "type": "suite", "event": "failed", "passed": 0, "failed": 1, "ignored": 0, "measured": 0, "filtered_out": 0, "exec_time": 0.00040313 }
```
**After:**
```console
$ target/debug/deps/test-???????????????? -Z unstable-options --format=json
{ "type": "suite", "event": "started", "test_count": 1 }
{ "type": "test", "event": "started", "name": "test" }
{ "type": "test", "name": "test", "event": "failed", "stdout": "STDOUT\nSTDERR\nError: \"RESULT\"" }
{ "type": "suite", "event": "failed", "passed": 0, "failed": 1, "ignored": 0, "measured": 0, "filtered_out": 0, "exec_time": 0.000261894 }
```
Uplift `clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles` lint into rustc
This PR, as the title suggests, uplifts [`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`] lint into rustc. This lint warns for code like this:
```rust
for _ in Some(1) {}
for _ in Ok::<_, ()>(1) {}
```
i.e. directly iterating over `Option` and `Result` using `for` loop.
There are a number of suggestions that this PR adds (on top of what clippy suggested):
1. If the argument (? is there a better name for that expression) of a `for` loop is a `.next()` call, then we can suggest removing it (or rather replacing with `.by_ref()` to allow iterator being used later)
```rust
for _ in iter.next() {}
// turns into
for _ in iter.by_ref() {}
```
2. (otherwise) We can suggest using `while let`, this is useful for non-iterator, iterator-like things like [async] channels
```rust
for _ in rx.recv() {}
// turns into
while let Some(_) = rx.recv() {}
```
3. If the argument type is `Result<impl IntoIterator, _>` and the body has a `Result<_, _>` type, we can suggest using `?`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
for _ in f()? {}
```
4. To preserve the original behavior and clear intent, we can suggest using `if let`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
if let Some(_) = f() {}
```
(P.S. `Some` and `Ok` are interchangeable depending on the type)
I still feel that the lint wording/look is somewhat off, so I'll be happy to hear suggestions (on how to improve suggestions :D)!
Resolves#99272
[`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_loops_over_fallibles
Uplift `clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles` lint into rustc
This PR, as the title suggests, uplifts [`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`] lint into rustc. This lint warns for code like this:
```rust
for _ in Some(1) {}
for _ in Ok::<_, ()>(1) {}
```
i.e. directly iterating over `Option` and `Result` using `for` loop.
There are a number of suggestions that this PR adds (on top of what clippy suggested):
1. If the argument (? is there a better name for that expression) of a `for` loop is a `.next()` call, then we can suggest removing it (or rather replacing with `.by_ref()` to allow iterator being used later)
```rust
for _ in iter.next() {}
// turns into
for _ in iter.by_ref() {}
```
2. (otherwise) We can suggest using `while let`, this is useful for non-iterator, iterator-like things like [async] channels
```rust
for _ in rx.recv() {}
// turns into
while let Some(_) = rx.recv() {}
```
3. If the argument type is `Result<impl IntoIterator, _>` and the body has a `Result<_, _>` type, we can suggest using `?`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
for _ in f()? {}
```
4. To preserve the original behavior and clear intent, we can suggest using `if let`
```rust
for _ in f() {}
// turns into
if let Some(_) = f() {}
```
(P.S. `Some` and `Ok` are interchangeable depending on the type)
I still feel that the lint wording/look is somewhat off, so I'll be happy to hear suggestions (on how to improve suggestions :D)!
Resolves#99272
[`clippy::for_loops_over_fallibles`]: https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/master/index.html#for_loops_over_fallibles
fix: in VSCode, correctly resolve relative paths to errors
VS Code problem matcher are restricted to be static "regexes". You can't create a problem matcher dynamically, and you can't use custom code in lieu of problem matcher.
This creates a problem for rust/cargo compiler errors. They use paths relative to the root of the Cargo workspace, but VS Code doesn't necessary know where that root is.
Luckily, there's a way out: our current problem matcher is defined like this:
"fileLocation": [ "autoDetect", "${workspaceRoot}" ],
That means that relative pahts would be resoleved relative to workspace root. VS Code allows to specify a command inside `${}`. So we can plug custom logic there to fetch Cargo's workspace root!
And that's exactly what this PR is doing!
internal: Add `GenericParamList::to_generic_args` and `{TypeParam,ConstParam}::remove_default` APIs
Also fixes `generate_impl` not removing the default const param value, though it seems that no one has encountered or reported that issue yet 😅
This initially started out as refactoring `utils::generate_impl_text_inner` to understand it better (which was the reason for adding `{TypeParam,ConstParam}::remove_default`), but ended up also finding another place that needed `GenericParamList::to_generic_args`, hence its addition in here.
When added in 45964368f4, these multi-class
selectors were present in the initial commit, but no reason was given why
the shorter selector wouldn't work.
Use BOLT in CI to optimize LLVM
This PR adds an optimization step in the Linux `dist` CI pipeline that uses [BOLT](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/tree/main/bolt) to optimize the `libLLVM.so` library built by boostrap.
Steps:
- [x] Use LLVM 15 as a bootstrap compiler and use it to build BOLT
- [x] Compile LLVM with support for relocations (`-DCMAKE_SHARED_LINKER_FLAGS="-Wl,-q"`)
- [x] Gather profile data using instrumented LLVM
- [x] Apply profile to LLVM that has already been PGOfied
- [x] Run with BOLT profiling on more benchmarks
- [x] Decide on the order of optimization (PGO -> BOLT?)
- [x] Decide how we should get `bolt` (currently we use the host `bolt`)
- [x] Clean up
The latest perf results can be found [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94381#issuecomment-1258269440). The current CI build time with BOLT applied is around 1h 55 minutes.
Add missing documentation for FileNameDisplayPreference variants
Took me a while to find the information when I needed it so hopefully it should save some time for the next ones.
r? ``@thomcc``
Elaborate trait ref to compute object safety.
instead of building them manually from supertraits and associated items.
This allows to have the correct substs for GATs.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/102751
add Vec::push_within_capacity - fallible, does not allocate
This method can serve several purposes. It
* is fallible
* guarantees that items in Vec aren't moved
* allows loops that do `reserve` and `push` separately to avoid pulling in the allocation machinery a second time in the `push` part which should make things easier on the optimizer
* eases the path towards `ArrayVec` a bit since - compared to `push()` - there are fewer questions around how it should be implemented
I haven't named it `try_push` because that should probably occupy a middle ground that will still try to reserve and only return an error in the unlikely OOM case.
resolves#84649
