Rollup of 6 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95301 (Remove `Nonterminal::NtTT`.)
- #95314 (Tell users that `||` operators are not currently supported in let chain expressions)
- #95350 (resolve: Simplify some diagnostic code to avoid an ICE)
- #95370 ([bootstrap] Don't print `Suite not skipped` unless `--verbose` is set)
- #95390 (Ignore doc comments in a declarative macro matcher.)
- #95401 (Remove duplicated and unused test files)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Ignore doc comments in a declarative macro matcher.
Fixes#95267. Reverts to the old behaviour before #95159 introduced a
regression.
r? `@petrochenkov`
[bootstrap] Don't print `Suite not skipped` unless `--verbose` is set
This was so verbose before that it made it hard to see what effect the flag actually had.
Before:
```
Set({test::src/tools/tidy}) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Tidy" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/ui) because it is excluded
Suite(test::src/test/run-pass-valgrind) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::RunPassValgrind" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/mir-opt) because it is excluded
Suite(test::src/test/codegen) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Codegen" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Suite(test::src/test/codegen-units) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::CodegenUnits" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Suite(test::src/test/assembly) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Assembly" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Suite(test::src/test/incremental) not skipped for "bootstrap::test::Incremental" -- not in [src/test/ui, src/test/mir-opt/, src/test/debuginfo, src/test/ui-fulldeps]
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/debuginfo) because it is excluded
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/ui-fulldeps) because it is excluded
... about 100 more lines ...
```
After:
```
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/ui) because it is excluded
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/mir-opt) because it is excluded
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/debuginfo) because it is excluded
Skipping Suite(test::src/test/ui-fulldeps) because it is excluded
```
resolve: Simplify some diagnostic code to avoid an ICE
No need to resolve those paths, they are already resolved, we just need to take the results from `partial_res_map`.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/95327
Tell users that `||` operators are not currently supported in let chain expressions
Tells that `||` operators are not currently supported instead of not allowed. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53667#issuecomment-1066075876
In other words, this PR is pretty much trivial.
Remove `Nonterminal::NtTT`.
It's only needed for macro expansion, not as a general element in the
AST. This commit removes it, adds `NtOrTt` for the parser and macro
expansion cases, and renames the variants in `NamedMatch` to better
match the new type.
r? `@petrochenkov`
rustdoc: add 🔒 to items with restricted visibility
This change marks items with restricted visibility with 🔒 when building with `--document-private-items`:
<img width="278" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-20 at 23 50 24" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/159189513-9e4b09bb-6785-41a5-bfe2-df02f83f8641.png">
There also appears a “Restricted Visibility” tooltip when hovering over the emoji.
---
The original PR for reference:
This change makes private items slightly transparent (similar to `unstable` items in rustc):
<img width="272" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-16 at 22 17 43" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/158692627-a1f6f5ec-e043-4aa2-9352-8d2b15c31c08.png">
I found myself using `--document-private-items` a lot recently because I find the documentation of private internals quite helpful when working on a larger project. However, not being able to distinguish private from public items (see #87785) when looking at the documentation makes this somewhat cumbersome.
This PR addresses the third suggestion of issue #87785 by marking private items typographically. It seems to me that the other suggestions are more involved but this is at least a first step.
A private item is also made slightly transparent in the path displayed in the header of a page:
<img width="467" alt="Screen Shot 2022-03-16 at 22 19 51" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/509209/158692885-0bbd3417-3c0b-486f-b8ab-99c05c6fa7ca.png">
I am looking forward to feedback and suggestions.
Make fatal DiagnosticBuilder yield `!`
Fatal errors should really be fatal, so emitting them should cause us to exit at the same time.
Fine with just throwing away these changes if they're not worthwhile. Also, maybe we want to use an uninhabited enum instead of `!`.
r? `@eddyb` who has been working on `DiagnosticBuilder` stuff, feel free to reassign.
Skip needless bitset for debuginfo
Found this while digging around looking at the inlining logic.
Seemed obvious enough so I decided to try to take care of it.
Is this what you had in mind, `@eddyb?`
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #88375 (Clarify that ManuallyDrop<T> has same layout as T)
- #93755 (Allow comparing `Vec`s with different allocators using `==`)
- #95016 (Docs: make Vec::from_raw_parts documentation less strict)
- #95098 (impl From<&[T; N]> and From<&mut [T; N]> for Vec<T>)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Allow comparing `Vec`s with different allocators using `==`
See https://stackoverflow.com/q/71021633/7884305.
I did not changed the `PartialOrd` impl too because it was not generic already (didn't support `Vec<T> <=> Vec<U> where T: PartialOrd<U>`).
Does it needs tests?
I don't think this will hurt type inference much because the default allocator is usually not inferred (`new()` specifies it directly, and even with other allocators, you pass the allocator to `new_in()` so the compiler usually knows the type).
I think this requires FCP since the impls are already stable.
Clarify that ManuallyDrop<T> has same layout as T
This PR implements the documentation change under discussion in https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/302. It should not be approved or merged until the discussion there is resolved.
