Relate receiver invariantly in method probe for `Mode::Path`
Effectively reverts part of #126128Fixes#126227
This PR changes method probing to use equality for fully path-based method lookup, and subtyping for receiver `.` method lookup.
r? lcnr
Use ordinal number in argument error
Add an ordinal number to two argument errors ("unexpected" and "missing") for ease of understanding error.
```
error[E0061]: this function takes 3 arguments but 2 arguments were supplied
--> test.rs:11:5
|
11 | f(42, 'a');
| ^ --- 2nd argument of type `f32` is missing
|
(snip)
error[E0061]: this function takes 3 arguments but 4 arguments were supplied
--> test.rs:12:5
|
12 | f(42, 42, 1.0, 'a');
| ^ ----
| | |
| | unexpected 2nd argument of type `{integer}`
| help: remove the extra argument
```
To get an ordinal number, I copied `ordinalize` from other crate `rustc_resolve` because I think it is too much to link `rustc_resolve` for this small function. Please let me know if there is a better way.
Rename HIR `TypeBinding` to `AssocItemConstraint` and related cleanup
Rename `hir::TypeBinding` and `ast::AssocConstraint` to `AssocItemConstraint` and update all items and locals using the old terminology.
Motivation: The terminology *type binding* is extremely outdated. "Type bindings" not only include constraints on associated *types* but also on associated *constants* (feature `associated_const_equality`) and on RPITITs of associated *functions* (feature `return_type_notation`). Hence the word *item* in the new name. Furthermore, the word *binding* commonly refers to a mapping from a binder/identifier to a "value" for some definition of "value". Its use in "type binding" made sense when equality constraints (e.g., `AssocTy = Ty`) were the only kind of associated item constraint. Nowadays however, we also have *associated type bounds* (e.g., `AssocTy: Bound`) for which the term *binding* doesn't make sense.
---
Old terminology (HIR, rustdoc):
```
`TypeBinding`: (associated) type binding
├── `Constraint`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: (associated) equality constraint (?)
├── `Ty`: (associated) type binding
└── `Const`: associated const equality (constraint)
```
Old terminology (AST, abbrev.):
```
`AssocConstraint`
├── `Bound`
└── `Equality`
├── `Ty`
└── `Const`
```
New terminology (AST, HIR, rustdoc):
```
`AssocItemConstraint`: associated item constraint
├── `Bound`: associated type bound
└── `Equality`: associated item equality constraint OR associated item binding (for short)
├── `Ty`: associated type equality constraint OR associated type binding (for short)
└── `Const`: associated const equality constraint OR associated const binding (for short)
```
r? compiler-errors
Rework ptr-to-ref conversion suggestion for method calls
If we have a value `z` of type `*const u8` and try to call `z.to_string()`, the upstream compiler will show you a note suggesting to call `<*const u8>::as_ref` first.
This PR extends that:
- The note will only be shown when the method would exist on the corresponding reference type
- It can now suggest any of `<*const u8>::as_ref`, `<*mut u8>::as_ref` and `<*mut u8>::as_mut`, depending on what the method needs.
I didn't introduce a `help` message because that's not a good idea with `unsafe` functions (and you'd also need to unwrap the `Option<&_>` somehow).
People should check the safety requirements.
For the simplest case
```rust
fn main() {
let x = 8u8;
let z: *const u8 = &x;
// issue #21596
println!("{}", z.to_string()); //~ ERROR E0599
}
```
the output changes like this:
```diff
error[E0599]: `*const u8` doesn't implement `std::fmt::Display`
--> $DIR/suggest-convert-ptr-to-ref.rs:5:22
|
LL | println!("{}", z.to_string());
| ^^^^^^^^^ `*const u8` cannot be formatted with the default formatter
|
- = note: try using `<*const T>::as_ref()` to get a reference to the type behind the pointer: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.pointer.html#method.as_ref
- = note: using `<*const T>::as_ref()` on a pointer which is unaligned or points to invalid or uninitialized memory is undefined behavior
+note: the method `to_string` exists on the type `&u8`
+ --> $SRC_DIR/alloc/src/string.rs:LL:COL
+ = note: try using the unsafe method `<*const T>::as_ref` to get an optional reference to the value behind the pointer: https://doc.rust-lang.org/std/primitive.pointer.html#method.as_ref
= note: the following trait bounds were not satisfied:
`*const u8: std::fmt::Display`
which is required by `*const u8: ToString`
```
I removed the separate note about the safety requirements because it was incomplete and the linked doc page already has the information you need.
Fixes#83695, but that's more of a side effect. The upstream compiler already suggests the right method name here.
Use `fn` ptr signature instead of `{closure@..}` in infer error
When suggesting a type on inference error, do not use `{closure@..}`. Instead, replace with an appropriate `fn` ptr.
On the error message, use `short_ty_string` and write long types to disk.
```
error[E0284]: type annotations needed for `Select<{closure@lib.rs:2782:13}, _, Expression<'_>, _>`
--> crates/lang/src/parser.rs:41:13
|
41 | let lit = select! {
| ^^^
42 | Token::Int(i) = e => Expression::new(Expr::Lit(ast::Lit::Int(i.parse().unwrap())), e.span()),
| ---- type must be known at this point
|
= note: the full type name has been written to '/home/gh-estebank/iowo/target/debug/deps/lang-e2d6e25819442273.long-type-4587393693885174369.txt'
= note: cannot satisfy `<_ as chumsky::input::Input<'_>>::Span == SimpleSpan`
help: consider giving `lit` an explicit type, where the type for type parameter `I` is specified
|
41 | let lit: Select<for<'a, 'b> fn(tokens::Token<'_>, &'a mut MapExtra<'_, 'b, _, _>) -> Option<Expression<'_>>, _, Expression<'_>, _> = select! {
| +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0284]: type annotations needed for `Select<{closure@/home/gh-estebank/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/chumsky-1.0.0-alpha.6/src/lib.rs:2782:13: 2782:28}, _, Expression<'_>, _>`
--> crates/lang/src/parser.rs:41:13
|
41 | let lit = select! {
| ^^^
42 | Token::Int(i) = e => Expression::new(Expr::Lit(ast::Lit::Int(i.parse().unwrap())), e.span()),
| ---- type must be known at this point
|
= note: cannot satisfy `<_ as chumsky::input::Input<'_>>::Span == SimpleSpan`
help: consider giving `lit` an explicit type, where the type for type parameter `I` is specified
|
41 | let lit: Select<{closure@/home/gh-estebank/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/chumsky-1.0.0-alpha.6/src/lib.rs:2782:13: 2782:28}, _, Expression<'_>, _> = select! {
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
```
Address #123630 (test missing).
When suggesting a type on inference error, do not use `{closure@..}`.
Instead, replace with an appropriate `fn` ptr.
On the error message, use `short_ty_string` and write long types to
disk.
```
error[E0284]: type annotations needed for `Select<{closure@lib.rs:2782:13}, _, Expression<'_>, _>`
--> crates/lang/src/parser.rs:41:13
|
41 | let lit = select! {
| ^^^
42 | Token::Int(i) = e => Expression::new(Expr::Lit(ast::Lit::Int(i.parse().unwrap())), e.span()),
| ---- type must be known at this point
|
= note: the full type name has been written to '/home/gh-estebank/iowo/target/debug/deps/lang-e2d6e25819442273.long-type-4587393693885174369.txt'
= note: cannot satisfy `<_ as chumsky::input::Input<'_>>::Span == SimpleSpan`
help: consider giving `lit` an explicit type, where the type for type parameter `I` is specified
|
41 | let lit: Select<for<'a, 'b> fn(tokens::Token<'_>, &'a mut MapExtra<'_, 'b, _, _>) -> Option<Expression<'_>>, _, Expression<'_>, _> = select! {
| +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
```
instead of
```
error[E0284]: type annotations needed for `Select<{closure@/home/gh-estebank/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/chumsky-1.0.0-alpha.6/src/lib.rs:2782:13: 2782:28}, _, Expression<'_>, _>`
--> crates/lang/src/parser.rs:41:13
|
41 | let lit = select! {
| ^^^
42 | Token::Int(i) = e => Expression::new(Expr::Lit(ast::Lit::Int(i.parse().unwrap())), e.span()),
| ---- type must be known at this point
|
= note: cannot satisfy `<_ as chumsky::input::Input<'_>>::Span == SimpleSpan`
help: consider giving `lit` an explicit type, where the type for type parameter `I` is specified
|
41 | let lit: Select<{closure@/home/gh-estebank/.cargo/registry/src/index.crates.io-6f17d22bba15001f/chumsky-1.0.0-alpha.6/src/lib.rs:2782:13: 2782:28}, _, Expression<'_>, _> = select! {
| ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
```
Fix#123630.
Use root obligation on E0277 for some cases
When encountering trait bound errors that satisfy some heuristics that tell us that the relevant trait for the user comes from the root obligation and not the current obligation, we use the root predicate for the main message.
This allows to talk about "X doesn't implement Pattern<'_>" over the most specific case that just happened to fail, like "char doesn't implement Fn(&mut char)" in
`tests/ui/traits/suggest-dereferences/root-obligation.rs`
The heuristics are:
- the type of the leaf predicate is (roughly) the same as the type from the root predicate, as a proxy for "we care about the root"
- the leaf trait and the root trait are different, so as to avoid talking about `&mut T: Trait` and instead remain talking about `T: Trait` instead
- the root trait is not `Unsize`, as to avoid talking about it in `tests/ui/coercion/coerce-issue-49593-box-never.rs`.
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `&char: Pattern<'_>` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/root-obligation.rs:6:38
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(c))
| -------- ^ the trait `Fn<(char,)>` is not implemented for `&char`, which is required by `&char: Pattern<'_>`
| |
| required by a bound introduced by this call
|
= note: required for `&char` to implement `FnOnce<(char,)>`
= note: required for `&char` to implement `Pattern<'_>`
note: required by a bound in `core::str::<impl str>::contains`
--> $SRC_DIR/core/src/str/mod.rs:LL:COL
help: consider dereferencing here
|
LL | .filter(|c| "aeiou".contains(*c))
| +
```
Fix#79359, fix#119983, fix#118779, cc #118415 (the suggestion needs to change), cc #121398 (doesn't fix the underlying issue).
```
error[E0599]: no method named `map` found for struct `Vec<bool>` in the current scope
--> $DIR/vec-on-unimplemented.rs:3:23
|
LL | vec![true, false].map(|v| !v).collect::<Vec<_>>();
| ^^^ `Vec<bool>` is not an iterator
|
help: call `.into_iter()` first
|
LL | vec![true, false].into_iter().map(|v| !v).collect::<Vec<_>>();
| ++++++++++++
```
We used to provide some help through `rustc_on_unimplemented` on non-`impl Trait` and non-type-params, but this lets us get rid of some otherwise unnecessary conditions in the annotation on `Iterator`.
