Remove "execute" bit from lock file permissions
Previously, flock would set the "execute" bit on Rust lock files. That makes no sense.
This patch clears the "execute" bit on Rust lock files.
See issue #102531.
Add `Box<[T; N]>: TryFrom<Vec<T>>`
We have `[T; N]: TryFrom<Vec<T>>` (#76310) and `Box<[T; N]>: TryFrom<Box<[T]>>`, but not this combination.
`vec.into_boxed_slice().try_into()` isn't quite a replacement for this, as that'll reallocate unnecessarily in the error case.
**Insta-stable, so needs an FCP**
(I tried to make this work with `, A`, but that's disallowed because of `#[fundamental]` https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/29635#issuecomment-1247598385)
The final return value doesn't need to be tried at all -- we can just
return the checked option directly. The optimizer can probably figure
this out anyway, but there's no need to make it work here.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #102454 (Suggest parentheses for possible range method calling)
- #102466 (only allow `ConstEquate` with `feature(gce)`)
- #102945 (Do not register placeholder `RegionOutlives` obligations when `considering_regions` is false)
- #103091 (rustdoc: remove unused HTML class `sidebar-title`)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Do not register placeholder `RegionOutlives` obligations when `considering_regions` is false
**NOTE:** I'm kinda just putting this up for discussion. I'm not certain this is correct...?
This was introduced in [`608625d`](608625dae9 (diff-6e54b18681342ec725d75591dbf384ad08cd73df29db00485fe51b4e90f76ff7R361)).
Interestingly, we only check `data.has_placeholders()` for `RegionOutlives`, and not for `TypeOutlives`... why? For the record, that different treatment between `RegionOutlives` and `TypeOutlives` is why the fix "The compiling succeeds when all `'a : 'b` are replaced with `&'a () : 'b`" in #100689 _"works"_, but it seems like an implementation detail considering this.
Also, why do we care about placeholder regions being registered if `considering_regions` is false? It doesn't seem to affect any UI tests, for example.
r? `@lcnr`
Fixes#102899Fixes#100689
Add `unused_format_specs` lint
Currently catches two cases:
An empty precision specifier:
```rust
// the same as {}
println!("{:.}", x);
```
And using formatting specs on `format_args!()`:
```rust
// prints `x.`, not `x .`
println("{:5}.", format_args!("x"));
```
changelog: new lint: [`unused_format_specs`]
remote-test-server: Show command line arguments
The user of remote-test-server should get at least some minimal command line help as this is often started manually.
r? `@pietroalbini`
Sometimes it is convenient to return a subdiagnostic enum where one or
more of the variants don't add anything to the diagnostic.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Documentation comments shouldn't affect the diagnostic derive in any
way, but explicit support has to be added for ignoring the `doc`
attribute.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
