Properly ban the negation of unsigned integers in type-checking.
Lint-time banning of unsigned negation appears to be vestigial from a time it was feature-gated.
But now it always errors and we do have the ability to deref the checking of e.g. `-0`, through the trait obligation fulfillment context, which will only succeed/error when the `0` gets inferred to a specific type.
The two removed tests are the main reason for finally cleaning this up, they need changing all the time when refactoring the HIR-based `rustc_const_eval` and/or `rustc_passes::consts`, as warnings pile up.
Some i128 tests
* Add some FFI tests for i128 on architectures where we have sort of working "C" FFI support. On all other architectures we ignore the test.
* enhance the u128 overflow tests
Additional cleanup to rustc_trans
Removes `BlockAndBuilder`, `FunctionContext`, and `MaybeSizedValue`.
`LvalueRef` is used instead of `MaybeSizedValue`, which has the added benefit of making functions operating on `Lvalue`s be able to take just that (since it encodes the type with an `LvalueTy`, which can carry discriminant information) instead of a `MaybeSizedValue` and a discriminant.
r? @eddyb
rustbuild: Quickly `dist` cross-host compilers
This commit optimizes the compile time for creating tarballs of cross-host
compilers and as a proof of concept adds two to the standard Travis matrix. Much
of this commit is further refactoring and refining of the `step.rs` definitions
along with the interpretation of `--target` and `--host` flags. This has gotten
confusing enough that I've also added a small test suite to
`src/bootstrap/step.rs` to ensure what we're doing works and doesn't regress.
After this commit when you execute:
./x.py dist --host $MY_HOST --target $MY_HOST
the build system will compile two compilers. The first is for the build platform
and the second is for the host platform. This second compiler is then packaged
up and placed into `build/dist` and is ready to go. With a fully cached LLVM and
docker image I was able to create a cross-host compiler in around 20 minutes
locally.
Eventually we plan to add a whole litany of cross-host entries to the Travis
matrix, but for now we're just adding a few before we eat up all the extra
capacity.
cc #38531
Document custom derive.
These are some bare-bones documentation for custom derive, needed
to stabilize "macros 1.1",
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35900
The book chapter is based off of a blog post by @cbreeden,
https://cbreeden.github.io/Macros11/
Normally, we have a policy of not mentioning external crates in
documentation. However, given that syn/quote are basically neccesary
for properly using macros 1.1, I feel that not including them here
would make the documentation very bad. So the rules should be bent
in this instance.
So far, this PR includes only docs; @alexcrichton said in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35900 that he'd be okay with landing them before stabilization; I don't mind either way.
This commit fixes a mistake introduced in #31618 where overlapped handles were
leaked to child processes on Windows. On Windows once a handle is in overlapped
mode it should always have I/O executed with an instance of `OVERLAPPED`. Most
child processes, however, are not prepared to have their stdio handles in
overlapped mode as they don't use `OVERLAPPED` on reads/writes to the handle.
Now we haven't had any odd behavior in Rust up to this point, and the original
bug was introduced almost a year ago. I believe this is because it turns out
that if you *don't* pass an `OVERLAPPED` then the system will [supply one for
you][link]. In this case everything will go awry if you concurrently operate on
the handle. In Rust, however, the stdio handles are always locked, and there's
no way to not use them unlocked in libstd. Due to that change we've always had
synchronized access to these handles, which means that Rust programs typically
"just work".
Conversely, though, this commit fixes the test case included, which exhibits
behavior that other programs Rust spawns may attempt to execute. Namely, the
stdio handles may be concurrently used and having them in overlapped mode wreaks
havoc.
[link]: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/oldnewthing/20121012-00/?p=6343Closes#38811
Due to #28728 loop {} is very risky and can lead to fun debugging experiences like in #38136. Besides, aborting is probably better behavior than an infinite loop.
These are some bare-bones documentation for custom derive, needed
to stabilize "macros 1.1",
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/35900
The book chapter is based off of a blog post by @cbreeden,
https://cbreeden.github.io/Macros11/
Normally, we have a policy of not mentioning external crates in
documentation. However, given that syn/quote are basically neccesary
for properly using macros 1.1, I feel that not including them here
would make the documentation very bad. So the rules should be bent
in this instance.
rustc: Stabilize the `proc_macro` feature
This commit stabilizes the `proc_macro` and `proc_macro_lib` features in the
compiler to stabilize the "Macros 1.1" feature of the language. Many more
details can be found on the tracking issue, #35900.
Closes#35900
This commit optimizes the compile time for creating tarballs of cross-host
compilers and as a proof of concept adds two to the standard Travis matrix. Much
of this commit is further refactoring and refining of the `step.rs` definitions
along with the interpretation of `--target` and `--host` flags. This has gotten
confusing enough that I've also added a small test suite to
`src/bootstrap/step.rs` to ensure what we're doing works and doesn't regress.
After this commit when you execute:
./x.py dist --host $MY_HOST --target $MY_HOST
the build system will compile two compilers. The first is for the build platform
and the second is for the host platform. This second compiler is then packaged
up and placed into `build/dist` and is ready to go. With a fully cached LLVM and
docker image I was able to create a cross-host compiler in around 20 minutes
locally.
Eventually we plan to add a whole litany of cross-host entries to the Travis
matrix, but for now we're just adding a few before we eat up all the extra
capacity.
cc #38531
Fix transmute::<T, U> where T requires a bigger alignment than U
For transmute::<T, U> we simply pointercast the destination from a U
pointer to a T pointer, without providing any alignment information,
thus LLVM assumes that the destination is aligned to hold a value of
type T, which is not necessarily true. This can lead to LLVM emitting
machine instructions that assume said alignment, and thus cause aborts.
To fix this, we need to provide the actual alignment to store_operand()
and in turn to store() so they can set the proper alignment information
on the stores and LLVM can emit the proper machine instructions.
Fixes#32947
