change `.unwrap()` to `?` on write where `fmt::Result` is returned
Fixes#120090 which points out that some of the `.unwrap()`s in `rustc_middle/src/mir/pretty.rs` are likely meant to be `?`s
Remove `next_root_ty_var`
Uhh we seem to not have any test that relies on this anymore. Maybe due to the way we changed alias-relate or whatever.
Removing this hack helper fn because #119106 is the general solution.
r? lcnr
Improved collapse_debuginfo attribute, added command-line flag
Improved attribute collapse_debuginfo with variants: `#[collapse_debuginfo=(no|external|yes)]`.
Added command-line flag for default behaviour.
Work-in-progress: will add more tests.
cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100758
bootstrap: handle vendored sources when remapping crate paths
#115872 introduced a feature to add path remapping for crate dependencies, but only when they came from Cargo's registry cache, not a vendor directory.
This caused builds that used remapped debuginfo and vendor directories to fail with:
```
std::fs::read_dir(registry_src) failed with No such file or directory (os error 2)
```
or (if the `registry/src` directory exists but is empty)
```
error: --remap-path-prefix must contain '=' between FROM and TO
```
Fixes#117885 by explicitly supporting the `vendor` directory and adding it to `RUSTC_CARGO_REGISTRY_SRC_TO_REMAP`.
Note that `bootstrap.py` already assumes that `./vendor` within the rust repo is the only supported vendoring location.
r? `@pietroalbini`
[rustc_data_structures] Use partition_point to find slice range end.
This PR uses approach introduced in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/114152 to find
the end of the range. It's much easier to understand and reason about invariants of such
implementation.
Technically it's possible to make it even shorter by returning `&[start..end]` unconditionally
because even if searched item is not present in the slice, `start` and `end` would point at
the same index, so the range would be empty. The reason I decided not to use this shorter
implementation is because it would involve more comparisons in case there are no elements
in the slice with key equal to `key`.
Also, not that it matters much, but this implementation also improves perf according to the
benchmark below:
https://gist.github.com/ttsugriy/63c0ed39ae132b131931fa1f8a3dea55
The results on my M1 macbook air are:
```
Running benches/bin_search_slice_benchmark.rs (target/release/deps/bin_search_slice_benchmark-90fa6d68c3bd1298)
Benchmarking multiply add/binary_search_slice: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0002 s (1
multiply add/binary_search_slice
time: [44.719 ns 44.918 ns 45.158 ns]
No change in performance detected.
Found 3 outliers among 100 measurements (3.00%)
1 (1.00%) high mild
2 (2.00%) high severe
Benchmarking multiply add/binary_search_slice_new: Collecting 100 samples in estimated 5.0001
multiply add/binary_search_slice_new
time: [36.955 ns 37.060 ns 37.221 ns]
No change in performance detected.
Found 7 outliers among 100 measurements (7.00%)
3 (3.00%) high mild
4 (4.00%) high severe
```
Rollup of 8 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #119172 (Detect `NulInCStr` error earlier.)
- #119833 (Make tcx optional from StableMIR run macro and extend it to accept closures)
- #119967 (Add `PatKind::Err` to AST/HIR)
- #119978 (Move async closure parameters into the resultant closure's future eagerly)
- #120021 (don't store const var origins for known vars)
- #120038 (Don't create a separate "basename" when naming and opening a MIR dump file)
- #120057 (Don't ICE when deducing future output if other errors already occurred)
- #120073 (Remove spastorino from users_on_vacation)
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
error on incorrect implied bounds in wfcheck except for Bevy dependents
Rebase of #109763
Additionally, special cases Bevy `ParamSet` types to not trigger the lint. This is tracked in #119956.
Fixes#109628
Don't ICE when deducing future output if other errors already occurred
The situation can't really happen outside of erroneous code. What was interesting is that it ICEd before emitting any other diagnostics. This was because the other errors were silenced due to cycle_delay_bug cycle errors.
r? ```@compiler-errors```
fixes#119890
Don't create a separate "basename" when naming and opening a MIR dump file
These functions were split up by #77080, in order to support passing the dump file's “basename” (filename without extension) to the implementation of `-Zdump-mir-spanview`, so that it could be used as a page title.
That flag has since been removed (#119566), so now there's no particular reason for this code to handle the basename separately from the filename or full path.
This PR therefore restores things to (roughly) how they were before #77080.
Move async closure parameters into the resultant closure's future eagerly
Move async closure parameters into the closure's resultant future eagerly.
Before, we used to desugar `async |p1, p2, ..| { body }` as `|p1, p2, ..| { || async { body } }`. Now, we desugar the above like `|p1, p2, ..| { async move { let p1 = p1; let p2 = p2; ... body } }`. This mirrors the same desugaring that `async fn` does with its parameter types, and the compiler literally uses the same code via a shared helper function.
This removes the necessity for E0708, since now expressions like `async |x: i32| { x }` will not give you confusing borrow errors.
This does *not* fix the case where async closures have self-borrows. This will come with a general implementation of async closures, which is still in the works.
r? oli-obk
Make tcx optional from StableMIR run macro and extend it to accept closures
Change `run` macro to avoid sometimes unnecessary dependency on `TyCtxt`, and introduce `run_with_tcx` to capture use cases where `tcx` is required. Additionally, extend both macros to accept closures that may capture variables.
I've also modified the `internal()` method to make it safer, by accepting the type context to force the `'tcx` lifetime to match the context lifetime.
These are non-backward compatible changes, but they only affect internal APIs which are provided today as helper functions until we have a stable API to start the compiler.
Detect `NulInCStr` error earlier.
By making it an `EscapeError` instead of a `LitError`. This makes it like the other errors produced when checking string literals contents, e.g. for invalid escape sequences or bare CR chars.
NOTE: this means these errors are issued earlier, before expansion, which changes behaviour. It will be possible to move the check back to the later point if desired. If that happens, it's likely that all the string literal contents checks will be delayed together.
One nice thing about this: the old approach had some code in `report_lit_error` to calculate the span of the nul char from a range. This code used a hardwired `+2` to account for the `c"` at the start of a C string literal, but this should have changed to a `+3` for raw C string literals to account for the `cr"`, which meant that the caret in `cr"` nul error messages was one short of where it should have been. The new approach doesn't need any of this and avoids the off-by-one error.
r? ```@fee1-dead```
Update cargo
2 commits in 1cff2ee6b92e0ad3f87c44b70b28f788b2528b3c..1ae631085f01c1a72d05df1ec81f3759a8360042
2024-01-16 16:56:57 +0000 to 2024-01-17 17:26:41 +0000
- fix(json-msg): use pkgid spec in in JSON messages (rust-lang/cargo#13311)
- doc(features): Highlight the non-blocking feature gating technique (rust-lang/cargo#13307)
r? oli-obk
Could you check if this fixes miri build?
The advantage of this is that it does not need to be assigned to a
variable to be used in a `Context` creation, which is the most common
thing to want to do with a noop waker.
If an owned noop waker is desired, it can be created by cloning, but the
reverse is harder. Alternatively, both versions could be provided, like
`futures::task::noop_waker()` and `futures::task::noop_waker_ref()`, but
that seems to me to be API clutter for a very small benefit, whereas
having the `&'static` reference available is a large benefit.
Previous discussion on the tracking issue starting here:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98286#issuecomment-1862159766
