The current terse output gives 112 chars per line, which causes
wraparound for people using 100 char wide terminals, which is very
common.
This commit changes it to be exactly 100 wide, which makes the output
look much nicer.
Currently it's called in `parse_tt` every time a match rule is invoked.
This commit moves it so it's called instead once per match rule, in
`compile_declarative_macro. This is a performance win.
The commit also moves `compute_locs` out of `TtParser`, because there's
no longer any reason for it to be in there.
Use revisions to track NLL test output (part 1)
The idea here is 2 fold: 1) When we eventually do make NLL default on, that PR should be systematic in "delete revisions and corresponding error annotations" 2) This allows us to look at test NLL outputs in chunks. (Though, I've opted here not to "mark" these tests. There are some tests with NLL revisions *now* that will be missed. I expect we do a second pass once we have all the tests with NLL revisions; these tests should be easy enough to eyeball.)
The actual review here should be "easy", but a bit tedious. I expect we should manually go through each test output and confirm it's okay.
The majority of these are either: 1) Only span change (the one I see most common is highlighting an entire function call, rather than just the function name in that call) 2) "E0308 mismatched types" -> "lifetime does not live long enough" 3) "E0495 cannot infer an appropriate lifetime for lifetime parameter" -> "lifetime does not live long enough" 4) "E0312 lifetime of reference outlives lifetime of borrowed content" -> "lifetime does not live long enough" 5) "E0759 `XXX` has an anonymous lifetime `'_` but it needs to satisfy a `'static` lifetime requirement" -> "lifetime does not live long enough" 6) "E0623 lifetime mismatch" -> "lifetime does not live long enough"
Other than the now lack of an error code, most of these look fine (with most giving more helpful suggestions now).
`rfc1623` output isn't great.
cc ``@marmeladema`` if you want to look through these
Let's r? ``@oli-obk`` since you've commented on the Zulip thread ;)
caution against ptr-to-int transmutes
I don't know how strong of a statement we want to make here, but I am very concerned that the current docs could be interpreted as saying that ptr-to-int transmutes are just as okay as transmuting `*mut T` into an `&mut T`.
Examples [like this](https://github.com/rust-lang/unsafe-code-guidelines/issues/286#issuecomment-1085144431) show that ptr-to-int transmutes are deeply suspicious -- they are either UB, or they don't round-trip properly, or we have to basically say that `transmute` will actively look for pointers and do all the things a ptr-to-int cast does (which includes a global side-effect of marking the pointed-to allocation as 'exposed').
Another alternative might be to simply not talk about them... but we *do* want people to use casts rather than transmutes for this.
Cc `@rust-lang/lang`
Let CTFE to handle partially uninitialized unions without marking the entire value as uninitialized.
follow up to #94411
To fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/69488 and by extension fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/94371, we should stop treating types like `MaybeUninit<usize>` as something that the `Scalar` type in the interpreter engine can represent. So we add a new field to `abi::Primitive` that records whether the primitive is nested in a union
cc `@RalfJung`
r? `@ghost`
With the updated libc, UNIX stack overflow handling in libstd can now
use the common `si_addr` accessor function, rather than attempting to
use a field from that name in `siginfo_t`. This simplifies the
collection of the fault address, particularly on platforms where that
data resides within a union in `siginfo_t`.
Rollup of 4 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #95525 (Suggest derivable trait on E0277 error)
- #95654 (diagnostics: use correct span for const generics)
- #95660 (Update panic docs to make it clearer when to use panic vs Result)
- #95670 (Refactor: remove unused function parameters)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Update panic docs to make it clearer when to use panic vs Result
This is based on a question that came up in one of my [error handling office hours](https://twitter.com/yaahc_/status/1506376624509374467?s=20&t=Sp-cEjrx5kpMdNsAGPOo9w) meetings. I had a user who was fairly familiar with error type design, thiserror and anyhow, and rust in general, but who was still confused about when to use panics vs when to use Result and `Error`.
This will also be cross referenced in an error handling FAQ that I will be creating in the https://github.com/rust-lang/project-error-handling repo shortly.
Use the proc-macro descr to track their individual expansions with
self-profiling events. This will help diagnose performance issues
with slow proc-macros.
fix misspelling in diagnostic message of `bytes_nth`
*Please write a short comment explaining your change (or "none" for internal only changes)*
changelog: fix misspelling in diagnostic message in ``[`bytes_nth`]``
