This began as an attempt to fix an ICE in borrowck (issue #17655), but the rabbit hole went pretty deep. I ended up plumbing support for capture-by-reference unboxed closures all the way into trans.
Closes issue #17655.
Store references to the freevars instead of copies when constructing
the environment and insert an additional load when reading them from
the environment.
In particular, this causes mutation of an upvar to correctly mark
it as mutable during adjustment. This makes borrowck correctly
flag conflicting borrows, etc.
We still seem to generate incorrect code in trans which copies the upvar
by value into the closure. This remains to be fixed.
Previously it output `partially moved` to eagerly. This updates it to be more
accurate and output `collaterally moved` for use of values that were invalidated
by moves out of different fields in the same struct.
Closes#15630.
Fixes that unit-like structs cannot be used if they are re-exported and used in another crate. (ICE)
The relevant changes are in `rustc::metadata::{decoder, encoder}` and `rustc::middle::ty`.
A test case is included.
The problem is that the expressoin `UnitStruct` is an `ExprPath` to an `DefFn`, which is of expr kind `RvalueDatumExpr`, but for unit-struct ctors the expr kind should be `RvalueDpsExpr`. I fixed this (in a I guess clean way) by introducing `CtorFn` in the metadata and including a `is_ctor` flag in `DefFn`.
prefer `Deref` over `DerefMut` in all other circumstances.
Because the compiler now prefers `Deref`, this can break code that
looked like:
let mut foo = bar.borrow_mut();
(*foo).call_something_that_requires_mutable_self();
Replace this code with:
let mut foo = bar.baz();
(&mut *foo).call_something_that_requires_mutable_self();
Closes#12825.
[breaking-change]
r? @nikomatsakis
Modify ast::ExprMatch to include a new value of type ast::MatchSource,
making it easy to tell whether the match was written literally or
produced via desugaring. This allows us to customize error messages
appropriately.
Fixes that unit-like structs cannot be used if they are reexported and
used in another crate. The compiler fails with an ICE, because unit-like
structs are exported as DefFn and the expression `UnitStruct` is
interpreted as function pointer instead of a call to the constructor.
To resolve this ambiguity tuple-like struct constructors are now exported
as CtorFn. When `rustc::metadata::decoder` finds a CtorFn it sets a new
flag `is_ctor` in DefFn to true.
Relevant changes are in `rustc::metadata::{encoder, decoder}` and in
`rustc::middle::ty`.
Closes#12660 and #16973.
This is the bare minimum to stop using split stacks on Windows, fixing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/13259 and #14742, by turning on stack probes for all functions and disabling compiler and runtime support for split stacks on Windows.
It does not restore the out-of-stack error message, which requires more runtime work.
This includes a test that the Windows TCB is no longer being clobbered, but the out-of-stack test itself is pretty weak, only testing that the program exits abnormally, not that it isn't writing to bogus memory, so I haven't truly verified that this is providing the safety we claim.
A more complete solution is in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/16388, which has some unresolved issues yet.
cc @Zoxc @klutzy @vadimcn
This PR makes rustc emit debug locations for *all* call and invoke statements in LLVM IR, if they are contained within a function that debuginfo is enabled for. This is important because LLVM does not handle the case where a function body containing debuginfo is inlined into another function with debuginfo, but the inlined call statement does not have a debug location. In this case, LLVM will not know where (in terms of source code coordinates) the function was inlined to and we end up with some statements still linked to the source locations in there original, non-inlined function without any indication that they are indeed an inline-copy. Later, when generating DWARF from the IR, LLVM will interpret this as corrupt IR and abort.
Unfortunately, the undesirable case described above can still occur when using LTO. If there is a crate compiled without debuginfo calling into a crate compiled with debuginfo, we again end up with the conditions triggering the error. This is why some LTO tests still fail with the dreaded assertion, if the standard library was built with debuginfo enabled. That is, `RUSTFLAGS_STAGE2=-g make rustc-stage2` will succeed but `RUSTFLAGS_STAGE2=-g make check` will still fail after this PR has been merged. I will open a separate issue for this problem.
