With -O2, LLVM's inliner can remove this code, but this does not happen
with -O1 and lower. As a result, dropping Vec<u8> was linear with length,
resulting in abysmal performance for large buffers.
See issue #24280.
Move private bignum module to core::num, because it is not only used in flt2dec.
Extract private 80-bit soft-float into new core::num module for the same reason.
This breaks out some of the lints defined in `librustc_lint/builtin.rs` into two new modules: `unused` for the `UNUSED_*` lints and `bad_style` for the various style related lints as suggested in #22206. `builtin.rs` could probably get broken up more but this is a start.
By default, the linker in use under OpenBSD is the linker of base, which
don't include /usr/local/lib where libstdc++ of gcc-4.9 lives. We need
to add this directory to linker-path-search (using -L).
Search the path of libstdc++.a, which is a known name (libstdc++.so has
SO_VERSION) in the same directory.
r? @alexcrichton
this commit needs #28495 to be commited first. It should be the last piece for building rustc under OpenBSD from scratch.
By default, the linker in use under OpenBSD is the linker of base, which
don't include /usr/local/lib where libstdc++ of gcc-4.9 lives. We need
to add this directory to linker-path-search (using -L).
Search the path of libstdc++.a, which is a known name (libstdc++.so has
SO_VERSION) in the same directory.
Move private bignum module to core::num, because it is not only used in flt2dec.
Extract private 80-bit soft-float into new core::num module for the same reason.
This changes how rustic generate `id` and `href` attributes for section header anchor. Now they are more github-like.
Also fixes breakage in docs caused by this and broken links in "Error Handling" section of book.
r? @steveklabnik
cc @alexcrichton
With -O2, LLVM's inliner can remove this code, but this does not happen
with -O1 and lower. As a result, dropping Vec<u8> was linear with length,
resulting in abysmal performance for large buffers.
This reduces some clones of `Vec`s. These are not deep copies since the
token tree is made using `Rc`s, so this won't be a major improvement.
r? @eddyb
I assume the expected error changed during the development of pull
request #28321 and that wasn't noticed because the test was
accidentally not running.
r? @nikomatsakis
