Change #[suggestion_*] attributes to use style="..."
As discussed [on Zulip](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/336883-i18n/topic/.23100717.20tool_only_span_suggestion), this changes `#[(multipart_)suggestion_{short,verbose,hidden}(...)]` attributes to plain `#[(multipart_)suggestion(...)]` attributes with a `style = "{short,verbose,hidden}"` parameter.
It also adds a new style, `tool-only`, that corresponds to `tool_only_span_suggestion`/`tool_only_multipart_suggestion` and causes the suggestion to not be shown in human-readable output at all.
Best reviewed commit-by-commit, there's a bit of noise in there.
cc #100717 `@compiler-errors`
r? `@davidtwco`
Track where diagnostics were created.
This implements the `-Ztrack-diagnostics` flag, which uses `#[track_caller]` to track where diagnostics are created. It is meant as a debugging tool much like `-Ztreat-err-as-bug`.
For example, the following code...
```rust
struct A;
struct B;
fn main(){
let _: A = B;
}
```
...now emits the following error message:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src\main.rs:5:16
|
5 | let _: A = B;
| - ^ expected struct `A`, found struct `B`
| |
| expected due to this
-Ztrack-diagnostics: created at compiler\rustc_infer\src\infer\error_reporting\mod.rs:2275:31
```
The new implementation doesn't use weak lang items and instead changes
`#[alloc_error_handler]` to an attribute macro just like
`#[global_allocator]`.
The attribute will generate the `__rg_oom` function which is called by
the compiler-generated `__rust_alloc_error_handler`. If no `__rg_oom`
function is defined in any crate then the compiler shim will call
`__rdl_oom` in the alloc crate which will simply panic.
This also fixes link errors with `-C link-dead-code` with
`default_alloc_error_handler`: `__rg_oom` was previously defined in the
alloc crate and would attempt to reference the `oom` lang item, even if
it didn't exist. This worked as long as `__rg_oom` was excluded from
linking since it was not called.
This is a prerequisite for the stabilization of
`default_alloc_error_handler` (#102318).
spastorino noticed some silly expressions like `item_id.def_id.def_id`.
This commit renames several `def_id: OwnerId` fields as `owner_id`, so
those expressions become `item_id.owner_id.def_id`.
`item_id.owner_id.local_def_id` would be even clearer, but the use of
`def_id` for values of type `LocalDefId` is *very* widespread, so I left
that alone.
Add missing checks for `doc(cfg_hide(...))`
Part of #43781.
The `doc(cfg_hide(...))` attribute can only be used at the crate level and takes a list of attributes as argument.
r? ```@Manishearth```
Migrate rustc_passes diagnostics
Picks up abandoned work from https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100870
I would like to do this collaboratively, as there is a lot of work! Here's the process:
- Comment below that you are willing to help and I will add you as a collaborator to my `rust` fork (that gives you write access)
- Indicate which file/task you would like to work on (so we don't duplicate work) from the list below
- Do the work, push up a commit, comment that you're done with that file/task
- Repeat until done 😄
### Files to Migrate (in `compiler/rustc_passes/src/`)
- [x] check_attr.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] check_const.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] dead.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] debugger_visualizer.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] diagnostic_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] entry.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] lang_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] layout_test.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] lib_features.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] ~liveness.rs~ ``@CleanCut`` Nothing to do
- [x] loops.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] naked_functions.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] stability.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] weak_lang_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
### Tasks
- [x] Rebase on current `master` ``@CleanCut``
- [x] Review work from [the earlier PR](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100870) and make sure it all looks good
- [x] compiler/rustc_error_messages/locales/en-US/passes.ftl ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/check_attr.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/errors.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/lang_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/lib.rs ``@CleanCut``
- [x] compiler/rustc_passes/src/weak_lang_items.rs ``@CleanCut``
Move lint level source explanation to the bottom
So, uhhhhh
r? `@estebank`
## User-facing change
"note: `#[warn(...)]` on by default" and such are moved to the bottom of the diagnostic:
```diff
- = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
= warning: this was previously accepted by the compiler but is being phased out; it will become a hard error in a future release!
= note: for more information, see issue #87678 <https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/87678>
+ = note: `#[warn(unsupported_calling_conventions)]` on by default
```
Why warning is enabled is the least important thing, so it shouldn't be the first note the user reads, IMO.
## Developer-facing change
`struct_span_lint` and similar methods have a different signature.
Before: `..., impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>)`
After: `..., impl Into<DiagnosticMessage>, impl for<'a, 'b> FnOnce(&'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> &'b mut DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>`
The reason for this is that `struct_span_lint` needs to edit the diagnostic _after_ `decorate` closure is called. This also makes lint code a little bit nicer in my opinion.
Another option is to use `impl for<'a> FnOnce(LintDiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>) -> DiagnosticBuilder<'a, ()>` altough I don't _really_ see reasons to do `let lint = lint.build(message)` everywhere.
## Subtle problem
By moving the message outside of the closure (that may not be called if the lint is disabled) `format!(...)` is executed earlier, possibly formatting `Ty` which may call a query that trims paths that crashes the compiler if there were no warnings...
I don't think it's that big of a deal, considering that we move from `format!(...)` to `fluent` (which is lazy by-default) anyway, however this required adding a workaround which is unfortunate.
## P.S.
I'm sorry, I do not how to make this PR smaller/easier to review. Changes to the lint API affect SO MUCH 😢
