Commit Graph

164058 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
bors
06460fe72c Auto merge of #94548 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-spa38z8, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 8 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #93562 (Update the documentation for `{As,Into,From}Raw{Fd,Handle,Socket}`.)
 - #94101 (rustdoc: add test cases for hidden enum variants)
 - #94484 (8 - Make more use of `let_chains`)
 - #94522 (Remove out-of-context line at end of E0284 message)
 - #94534 (Re-export (unstable) core::ffi types from std::ffi)
 - #94536 (Move transmute_undefined_repr back to nursery again)
 - #94537 (Use ? operator in one instance instead of manual match)
 - #94544 (Add some examples to comments in mbe code)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-03-03 10:14:04 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
88aa75ba8e
Rollup merge of #94544 - mark-i-m:macro-comments, r=petrochenkov
Add some examples to comments in mbe code

I found these things non-obvious when re-familiarizing myself with the code.

r? `@petrochenkov`
2022-03-03 11:02:56 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
98c9ee8917
Rollup merge of #94537 - est31:master, r=notriddle
Use ? operator in one instance instead of manual match

As suggested [here](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94139#discussion_r818102403).

r? `@notriddle`
2022-03-03 11:02:55 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
250e7e1efe
Rollup merge of #94536 - dtolnay:transmute, r=Manishearth
Move transmute_undefined_repr back to nursery again

This PR reapplies #94014, which was reverted unintentionally I think by #94329. The combination of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8432 + https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-clippy/pull/8497 in clippy should prevent this from happening again.

r? `@Manishearth`
2022-03-03 11:02:54 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
6f1730c9e3
Rollup merge of #94534 - bstrie:cffistd, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Re-export (unstable) core::ffi types from std::ffi
2022-03-03 11:02:53 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
845516cd3b
Rollup merge of #94522 - thinety:fix-e0284-message, r=Dylan-DPC
Remove out-of-context line at end of E0284 message

Removed the last line of E0284 message because it was out of context (probably kept by accident when changing whole error message).
2022-03-03 11:02:52 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
dbf0372b72
Rollup merge of #94484 - c410-f3r:more-let-chains, r=jackh726
8 - Make more use of `let_chains`

Continuation of #94376.

cc #53667
2022-03-03 11:02:51 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
850511d483
Rollup merge of #94101 - notriddle:notriddle/strip-test-cases, r=GuillaumeGomez
rustdoc: add test cases for hidden enum variants
2022-03-03 11:02:50 +01:00
Matthias Krüger
afd6f5c478
Rollup merge of #93562 - sunfishcode:sunfishcode/io-docs, r=joshtriplett
Update the documentation for `{As,Into,From}Raw{Fd,Handle,Socket}`.

This change weakens the descriptions of the
`{as,into,from}_raw_{fd,handle,socket}` descriptions from saying that
they *do* express ownership relations to say that they are *typically used*
in ways that express ownership relations. This is needed since, for
example, std's own [`RawFd`] implements `{As,From,Into}Fd` without any of
the ownership relationships.

This adds proper `# Safety` comments to `from_raw_{fd,handle,socket}`,
adds the requirement that raw handles be not opened with the
`FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED` flag, and merges the `OwnedHandle::from_raw_handle`
comment into the main `FromRawHandle::from_raw_handle` comment.

And, this changes `HandleOrNull` and `HandleOrInvalid` to not implement
`FromRawHandle`, since they are intended for limited use in FFI situations,
and not for generic use, and they have constraints that are stronger than
the those of `FromRawHandle`.

[`RawFd`]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/std/os/unix/io/type.RawFd.html
2022-03-03 11:02:49 +01:00
bors
2f8d1a835b Auto merge of #94541 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-564wbq3, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #92061 (update char signess for openbsd)
 - #93072 (Compatible variants suggestion with desugaring)
 - #93354 (Add documentation about `BorrowedFd::to_owned`.)
 - #93663 (Rename `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd` to `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw`.)
 - #94375 (Adt copy suggestions)
 - #94433 (Improve allowness of the unexpected_cfgs lint)
 - #94499 (Documentation was missed when demoting Windows XP to no_std only)
 - #94505 (Restore the local filter on mono item sorting)
 - #94529 (Unused doc comments blocks)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-03-03 04:28:08 +00:00
Erik Desjardins
a381aefebb make test work on noopt builder 2022-03-02 22:46:23 -05:00
mark
88b99224c1 add some examples to comments in mbe code 2022-03-02 21:33:43 -06:00
Dan Gohman
8253cfef7a Remove the comment about FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED.
There may eventually be something to say about `FILE_FLAG_OVERLAPPED` here,
however this appears to be independent of the other changes in this PR,
so remove them from this PR so that it can be discussed separately.
2022-03-02 16:25:31 -08:00
Ralf Jung
24fc1151ee bless clippy 2022-03-02 19:20:27 -05:00
Dylan DPC
878a4ff90e
Rollup merge of #94529 - GuillaumeGomez:unused-doc-comments-blocks, r=estebank
Unused doc comments blocks

Fixes #77030.
2022-03-03 01:09:15 +01:00
Dylan DPC
3e6abf0c35
Rollup merge of #94505 - cuviper:mono-item-sort-local, r=michaelwoerister,davidtwco
Restore the local filter on mono item sorting

In `CodegenUnit::items_in_deterministic_order`, there's a comment that
only local HirIds should be taken into account, but #90408 removed the
`as_local` call that sets others to None. Restoring that check fixes the
s390x hangs seen in [RHBZ 2058803].

[RHBZ 2058803]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2058803
2022-03-03 01:09:14 +01:00
Dylan DPC
293fa7a32b
Rollup merge of #94499 - RandomInsano:patch-1, r=Dylan-DPC
Documentation was missed when demoting Windows XP to no_std only

After a quick discussion on #81250 which removed special casing for mutexes added [here](10b103af48) to support Windows XP, we can't say that the standard library can build for it.

This change modifies the tier 3 non-ARM targets to show the standard library will no longer build for these and there is no work being done to change that.
2022-03-03 01:09:13 +01:00
Dylan DPC
493ed7a6af
Rollup merge of #94433 - Urgau:check-cfg-allowness, r=petrochenkov
Improve allowness of the unexpected_cfgs lint

This pull-request improve the allowness (`#[allow(...)]`) of the `unexpected_cfgs` lint.

Before this PR only crate level `#![allow(unexpected_cfgs)]` worked, now with this PR it also work when put around `cfg!` or if it is in a upper level. Making it work ~for the attributes `cfg`, `cfg_attr`, ...~ for the same level is awkward as the current code is design to give "Some parent node that is close to this macro call" (cf. https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_expand/base/struct.ExpansionData.html) meaning that allow on the same line as an attribute won't work. I'm note even sure if this would be possible.

Found while working on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/94298.
r? ````````@petrochenkov````````
2022-03-03 01:09:12 +01:00
Dylan DPC
7537b2036a
Rollup merge of #94375 - WaffleLapkin:copy-suggestion, r=estebank
Adt copy suggestions

Previously we've only suggested adding `Copy` bounds when the type being moved/copied is a type parameter (generic). With this PR we also suggest adding bounds when a type
- Can be copy
- All predicates that need to be satisfied for that are based on type params

i.e. we will suggest `T: Copy` for `Option<T>`, but won't suggest anything for `Option<String>`.

An example:
```rust
fn duplicate<T>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
    (t, t)
}
```
New error (current compiler doesn't provide `help`:):
```text
error[E0382]: use of moved value: `t`
 --> t.rs:2:9
  |
1 | fn duplicate<T>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
  |                 - move occurs because `t` has type `Option<T>`, which does not implement the `Copy` trait
2 |     (t, t)
  |      -  ^ value used here after move
  |      |
  |      value moved here
  |
help: consider restricting type parameter `T`
  |
1 | fn duplicate<T: Copy>(t: Option<T>) -> (Option<T>, Option<T>) {
  |               ++++++
```

Fixes #93623
r? ``````````@estebank``````````
``````````@rustbot`````````` label +A-diagnostics +A-suggestion-diagnostics +C-enhancement

----

I'm not at all sure if this is the right implementation for this kind of suggestion, but it seems to work :')
2022-03-03 01:09:11 +01:00
Dylan DPC
c9dc44be24
Rollup merge of #93663 - sunfishcode:sunfishcode/as-raw-name, r=joshtriplett
Rename `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd` to `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw`.

Also, rename `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw_handle` and
`BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw_socket` to `BorrowedHandle::borrow_raw` and
`BorrowedSocket::borrow_raw`.

This is just a minor rename to reduce redundancy in the user code calling
these functions, and to eliminate an inessential difference between
`BorrowedFd` code and `BorrowedHandle`/`BorrowedSocket` code.

While here, add a simple test exercising `BorrowedFd::borrow_raw_fd`.

r? ``````@joshtriplett``````
2022-03-03 01:09:10 +01:00
Dylan DPC
bc1a8905d6
Rollup merge of #93354 - sunfishcode:sunfishcode/document-borrowedfd-toowned, r=joshtriplett
Add documentation about `BorrowedFd::to_owned`.

Following up on #88564, this adds documentation explaining why
`BorrowedFd::to_owned` returns another `BorrowedFd` rather than an
`OwnedFd`. And similar for `BorrowedHandle` and `BorrowedSocket`.

r? `````@joshtriplett`````
2022-03-03 01:09:09 +01:00
Dylan DPC
bdad4a7be7
Rollup merge of #93072 - m-ou-se:compatible-variants-suggestion-with-desugaring, r=estebank
Compatible variants suggestion with desugaring

This fixes #90553 for `for` loops and other desugarings.

r? ```@estebank```
2022-03-03 01:09:08 +01:00
Dylan DPC
a83021bda9
Rollup merge of #92061 - semarie:openbsd-archs, r=joshtriplett
update char signess for openbsd

it adds more archs support for openbsd: arm, mips64, powerpc, powerpc64, and riscv64.
2022-03-03 01:09:07 +01:00
The 8472
e18abbf2ac update available_parallelism docs since cgroups and sched_getaffinity are now taken into account 2022-03-03 00:43:46 +01:00
The 8472
af6d2ed245 hardcode /sys/fs/cgroup instead of doing a lookup via mountinfo
this avoids parsing mountinfo which can be huge on some systems and
something might be emulating cgroup fs for sandboxing reasons which means
it wouldn't show up as mountpoint

additionally the new implementation operates on a single pathbuffer, reducing allocations
2022-03-03 00:43:46 +01:00
The 8472
bac5523ea0 Use cgroup quotas for calculating available_parallelism
Manually tested via


```
// spawn a new cgroup scope for the current user
$ sudo systemd-run -p CPUQuota="300%" --uid=$(id -u) -tdS


// quota.rs
#![feature(available_parallelism)]
fn main() {
    println!("{:?}", std:🧵:available_parallelism()); // prints Ok(3)
}
```


Caveats

* cgroup v1 is ignored
* funky mountpoints (containing spaces, newlines or control chars) for cgroupfs will not be handled correctly since that would require unescaping /proc/self/mountinfo
  The escaping behavior of procfs seems to be undocumented. systemd and docker default to `/sys/fs/cgroup` so it should be fine for most systems.
* quota will be ignored when `sched_getaffinity` doesn't work
* assumes procfs is mounted under `/proc` and cgroupfs mounted and readable somewhere in the directory tree
2022-03-03 00:43:45 +01:00
Tomasz Miąsko
926bf1a371 Pass LLVM string attributes as string slices 2022-03-03 00:28:50 +01:00
Erik Desjardins
f147303434 fix tests on platforms where Align16 is represented as i128 2022-03-02 17:30:58 -05:00
est31
fe78bd4920 Use ? operator in one instance instead of manual match 2022-03-02 22:10:35 +01:00
flip1995
76f0305f83
Move transmute_undefined_repr back to nursery
There's still open discussion if this lint is ready to be enabled by
default. We want to give us more time to figure this out and prevent
this lint from getting to stable as an enabled-by-default lint.
2022-03-02 13:07:00 -08:00
Dan Gohman
af642bb466 Fix a broken doc link on Windows. 2022-03-02 12:39:36 -08:00
bors
8769f4ef2f Auto merge of #92214 - ehuss:submodule-bg-exit, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Error if submodule fetch fails.

In CI, if fetching a submodule fails, the script would exit successfully. Later parts of the build will fail due to the missing files, but it is a bit confusing, and I think it would be better to error out earlier.

The reason is that in bash, `wait` without arguments will exit 0 even if a background job exits with an error. The solution here is to wait on each individual job, which will return the exit code of the job.

This was encountered in #92177.
2022-03-02 19:50:55 +00:00
Guillaume Gomez
6f0eb2a4e1 Update stdarch submodule 2022-03-02 20:06:46 +01:00
Guillaume Gomez
fce6cecf7a Update unused_doc_comments ui test 2022-03-02 20:06:46 +01:00
Guillaume Gomez
628fbdf9b7 Fix unused_doc_comments lint errors 2022-03-02 20:06:35 +01:00
Caio
658ff942b0 8 - Make more use of let_chains 2022-03-02 16:02:37 -03:00
bstrie
9aed829fe6 Re-export core::ffi types from std::ffi 2022-03-02 13:52:31 -05:00
Mara Bos
b32cabf458 Update test output. 2022-03-02 19:30:25 +01:00
Mara Bos
85cc4710ef Add more tests for mismatched Option/Result return types. 2022-03-02 19:26:54 +01:00
Mara Bos
003c892f9f Fix Ok(()) suggestion when desugaring is involved. 2022-03-02 19:26:53 +01:00
xFrednet
5275d02433
Use Vec for expectations to have a constant order (RFC-2383) 2022-03-02 18:10:07 +01:00
Guillaume Gomez
ac891ea374 Extend unused_doc_comments lint to check on blocks 2022-03-02 18:02:06 +01:00
xFrednet
defc056ccc
Address review comments 2022-03-02 17:46:12 +01:00
xFrednet
4887eb7b2d
Added panics for unreachable states for expectations (RFC 2383) 2022-03-02 17:46:11 +01:00
xFrednet
3414ad9551
Emit unfullfilled_lint_expectation using a HirId for performance (RFC-2383) 2022-03-02 17:46:10 +01:00
xFrednet
a14456f91f
Reduced the size of LintExpectationId by 12 bytes (RFC-2383) 2022-03-02 17:46:10 +01:00
xFrednet
43dc430f52
Test expect with forbid and fix doc errors (RFC-2383)
* Add test to expect and the forbid a lint (RFC 2383)
2022-03-02 17:46:09 +01:00
xFrednet
aa2a0a83d9
Expect each lint in attribute individually (RFC-2383) 2022-03-02 17:46:09 +01:00
xFrednet
a9bf9eaef5
Add UI tests for the expect attribute (RFC-2383)
* Add UI tests with macros for the `expect` attribute (RFC-2383)
* Addressed review comments - mostly UI test updates (RFC-2383)
* Documented lint level attribute on macro not working bug (RFC-2383)
  See `rust#87391`
2022-03-02 17:46:08 +01:00
xFrednet
33a5945069
Make LintExpectationId stable between compilation sessions (RFC-2383) 2022-03-02 17:46:08 +01:00