Update manual now stable can be installed with rustup
this a new PR for #13374 as `bors squash` seemed to have broken `bors`
_______
`rustup` can now install `rust-analyzer` for the stable tool-chain. This commit removes the note that `rustup` can only install for the nightly branch and adjusts the command.
I also added a note on how to find the path to the `rust-analyzer` binary when installed using `rustup`, and suggestions on how to work around it not being placed in `~/.cargo/bin`.
I thought it would be ideal to point everyone to use `rustup run stable rust-analyzer` to start `rust-analyzer`. That would make it trivial to switch to nightly however I could not get this to work in `nvim` therefore I left it as a suggestion at the end.
`rustup` can now install `rust-analyzer` for the stable tool-chain. This commit removes the note that `rustup` can only install for the nightly branch and adjusts the command.
I also added a note on how to find the path to the `rust-analyzer` binary when installed using `rustup`, and suggestions on how to work around it not being placed in `~/.cargo/bin`.
I thought it would be ideal to point everyone to use `rustup run stable rust-analyzer` to start `rust-analyzer`. That would make it trivial to switch to nightly however I could not get this to work in `nvim` therefore I left it as a suggestion at the end.
Refactor completions expansion
Depends on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/13384
Diff is unfortunately massive as I changed the functions in the analysis module from associated ones to standalone (unfortunately without an extra commit)
Don't report build-scripts and proc-macros as metadata progress
Seems somewhat confusing to me, given `metadata` is already the step we do for workspace loading
Expand unmatched mbe fragments to reasonable default token trees
Currently we expand unmatched fragments by not replacing them at all, leaving us with `$ident`. This trips up the parser or subsequent macro calls. Instead it makes more sense to replace these with some reasonable default depending on the fragment kind which should make more recursive macro calls work better for completions.
Currently we expand unmatched fragments by not replacing them at all,
leaving us with `$ident`. This trips up the parser or subsequent macro
calls. Instead it makes more sense to replace these with some reasonable
default depending on the fragment kind which should make more recursive
macro calls work better for completions.
Add convert_named_struct_to_tuple_struct assist
Closes#11643, since the assist for converting in the other direction is already there (I based most of the implementation and all of the tests on it).
fix: in VSCode, correctly resolve relative paths to errors
VS Code problem matcher are restricted to be static "regexes". You can't create a problem matcher dynamically, and you can't use custom code in lieu of problem matcher.
This creates a problem for rust/cargo compiler errors. They use paths relative to the root of the Cargo workspace, but VS Code doesn't necessary know where that root is.
Luckily, there's a way out: our current problem matcher is defined like this:
"fileLocation": [ "autoDetect", "${workspaceRoot}" ],
That means that relative pahts would be resoleved relative to workspace root. VS Code allows to specify a command inside `${}`. So we can plug custom logic there to fetch Cargo's workspace root!
And that's exactly what this PR is doing!
internal: Add `GenericParamList::to_generic_args` and `{TypeParam,ConstParam}::remove_default` APIs
Also fixes `generate_impl` not removing the default const param value, though it seems that no one has encountered or reported that issue yet 😅
This initially started out as refactoring `utils::generate_impl_text_inner` to understand it better (which was the reason for adding `{TypeParam,ConstParam}::remove_default`), but ended up also finding another place that needed `GenericParamList::to_generic_args`, hence its addition in here.
VS Code problem matcher are restricted to be static "regexes". You can't
create a problem matcher dynamically, and you can't use custom code in
lieu of problem matcher.
This creates a problem for rust/cargo compiler errors. They use paths
relative to the root of the Cargo workspace, but VS Code doesn't
necessary know where that root is.
Luckily, there's a way out: our current problem matcher is defined like
this:
"fileLocation": [ "autoDetect", "${workspaceRoot}" ],
That means that relative pahts would be resoleved relative to workspace
root. VS Code allows to specify a command inside `${}`. So we can plug
custom logic there to fetch Cargo's workspace root!
And that's exactly what this PR is doing!
internal: ⬆️ xflags
The main change here should be that flags are not inhereted, so
$ rust-analyzer analysis-stats . -v -v
would do what it should do
We also no longer Don\'t
The main change here should be that flags are not inhereted, so
$ rust-analyzer analysis-stats . -v -v
would do what it should do
We also no longer Don\'t
fix: Make go-to-def work for `#[doc = include_str!("path")]`
See the added test, go-to-def on `#[doc = include_str!("path$0")]` should navigate to `path`.
minor: Fix go-to-def for shadowed `include*!`
Add a check in go-to-def feature, so that we don't assume any macro named `include`/`include_str`/`include_bytes` is the builtin one.
fix: use `BoundVar`s from current generic scope
Fixup for #13335, addresses https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/pull/13339#issuecomment-1266654607
Before the change in generic parameter order, `BoundVar`s for trait reference didn't change whether you are in an impl's scope or in an associated item's scope. Now that item's generic params come before its parent's, we need to shift their indices when we are in an associated item's scope.
