avoid full-slicing slices
If we already have a slice, there is no need to get another full-range slice from that, just use the original.
clippy::redundant_slicing
const_generics: Fix incorrect ty::ParamEnv::empty() usage
Fixes#80561
Not sure if I should keep the `debug!(..)`s or not but its the second time I've needed them so they sure seem useful lol
cc ``@lcnr``
r? ``@oli-obk``
const_generics: Dont evaluate array length const when handling errors
Fixes#79518Fixes#78246
cc ````@lcnr````
This was ICE'ing because we dont pass in the correct ``ParamEnv`` which meant that there was no ``Self: Foo`` predicate to make ``Self::Assoc`` well formed which caused an ICE when trying to normalize ``Self::Assoc`` in the mir interpreter
r? ````@varkor````
Suggest to create a new `const` item if the `fn` in the array is a `const fn`
Fixes#73734. If the `fn` in the array repeat expression is a `const fn`, suggest creating a new `const` item. On nightly, suggest creating an inline `const` block. This PR also removes the `suggest_const_in_array_repeat_expressions` as it is no longer necessary.
Example:
```rust
fn main() {
// Should not compile but hint to create a new const item (stable) or an inline const block (nightly)
let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
println!("{:?}", strings);
}
```
Gives this error:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `std::string::String: std::marker::Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:3:32
|
2 | let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `std::marker::Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
= note: the `Copy` trait is required because the repeated element will be copied
```
With this change, this is the error message:
```
error[E0277]: the trait bound `String: Copy` is not satisfied
--> $DIR/const-fn-in-vec.rs:3:32
|
LL | let strings: [String; 5] = [String::new(); 5];
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ the trait `Copy` is not implemented for `String`
|
= help: moving the function call to a new `const` item will resolve the error
```
Check the result cache before the DepGraph when ensuring queries
Split out of https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/70951
Calling `ensure` on already forced queries is a common operation.
Looking at the results cache first is faster than checking the DepGraph for a green node.
Try fast_reject::simplify_type in coherence before doing full check
This is a reattempt at landing #69010 (by `@jonas-schievink).` The change adds a fast path for coherence checking to see if there's no way for types to unify since full coherence checking can be somewhat expensive.
This has big effects on code generated by the [`windows`](https://github.com/microsoft/windows-rs) which in some cases spends as much as 20% of compilation time in the `specialization_graph_of` query. In local benchmarks this took a compilation that previously took ~500 seconds down to ~380 seconds.
This is surely not going to make a difference on much smaller crates, so the question is whether it will have a negative impact. #69010 was closed because some of the perf suite crates did show small regressions.
Additional discussion of this issue is happening [here](https://rust-lang.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/247081-t-compiler.2Fperformance/topic/windows-rs.20perf).
Rename HIR UnOp variants
This renames the variants in HIR UnOp from
enum UnOp {
UnDeref,
UnNot,
UnNeg,
}
to
enum UnOp {
Deref,
Not,
Neg,
}
Motivations:
- This is more consistent with the rest of the code base where most enum
variants don't have a prefix.
- These variants are never used without the `UnOp` prefix so the extra
`Un` prefix doesn't help with readability. E.g. we don't have any
`UnDeref`s in the code, we only have `UnOp::UnDeref`.
- MIR `UnOp` type variants don't have a prefix so this is more
consistent with MIR types.
- "un" prefix reads like "inverse" or "reverse", so as a beginner in
rustc code base when I see "UnDeref" what comes to my mind is
something like `&*` instead of just `*`.
This renames the variants in HIR UnOp from
enum UnOp {
UnDeref,
UnNot,
UnNeg,
}
to
enum UnOp {
Deref,
Not,
Neg,
}
Motivations:
- This is more consistent with the rest of the code base where most enum
variants don't have a prefix.
- These variants are never used without the `UnOp` prefix so the extra
`Un` prefix doesn't help with readability. E.g. we don't have any
`UnDeref`s in the code, we only have `UnOp::UnDeref`.
- MIR `UnOp` type variants don't have a prefix so this is more
consistent with MIR types.
- "un" prefix reads like "inverse" or "reverse", so as a beginner in
rustc code base when I see "UnDeref" what comes to my mind is
something like "&*" instead of just "*".
Rollup of 11 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #72209 (Add checking for no_mangle to unsafe_code lint)
- #80732 (Allow Trait inheritance with cycles on associated types take 2)
- #81697 (Add "every" as a doc alias for "all".)
- #81826 (Prefer match over combinators to make some Box methods inlineable)
- #81834 (Resolve typedef in HashMap lldb pretty-printer only if possible)
- #81841 ([rustbuild] Output rustdoc-json-types docs )
- #81849 (Expand the docs for ops::ControlFlow a bit)
- #81876 (parser: Fix panic in 'const impl' recovery)
- #81882 (⬆️ rust-analyzer)
- #81888 (Fix pretty printer macro_rules with semicolon.)
- #81896 (Remove outdated comment in windows' mutex.rs)
Failed merges:
r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
Allow Trait inheritance with cycles on associated types take 2
This reverts the revert of #79209 and fixes the ICEs that's occasioned by that PR exposing some problems that are addressed in #80648 and #79811.
For easier review I'd say, check only the last commit, the first one is just a revert of the revert of #79209 which was already approved.
This also could be considered part or the actual fix of #79560 but I guess for that to be closed and fixed completely we would need to land #80648 and #79811 too.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
cc `@Aaron1011`
Improve SIMD type element count validation
Resolvesrust-lang/stdsimd#53.
These changes are motivated by `stdsimd` moving in the direction of const generic vectors, e.g.:
```rust
#[repr(simd)]
struct SimdF32<const N: usize>([f32; N]);
```
This makes a few changes:
* Establishes a maximum SIMD lane count of 2^16 (65536). This value is arbitrary, but attempts to validate lane count before hitting potential errors in the backend. It's not clear what LLVM's maximum lane count is, but cranelift's appears to be much less than `usize::MAX`, at least.
* Expands some SIMD intrinsics to support arbitrary lane counts. This resolves the ICE in the linked issue.
* Attempts to catch invalid-sized vectors during typeck when possible.
Unresolved questions:
* Generic-length vectors can't be validated in typeck and are only validated after monomorphization while computing layout. This "works", but the errors simply bail out with no context beyond the name of the type. Should these errors instead return `LayoutError` or otherwise provide context in some way? As it stands, users of `stdsimd` could trivially produce monomorphization errors by making zero-length vectors.
cc `@bjorn3`
