instead of this panic:
```
thread '<main>' panicked at 'index out of bounds: the len is 1 but the
index is 1', src/libcollections/vec.rs:1110
```
It still panics, just like `-h` does, so it should be okay in this
regard.
The new bots we have may conflict with one another on base ports, causing tests
to fail. For example the linux-musl-64-opt and linux-64-opt bots are using the
same base port right now, causing some spurious failures every now and then.
Previously, if you copied a signature from a trait definition such as:
```
fn foo<'a>(&'a Bar) -> bool {}
```
and moved it into an `impl`, there would be an error message:
"unexpected token `'a`"
Adding to the error message that a pattern is expected should help
users to find the actual problem with using a lifetime here.
This PR adds a note to the end of the Windows build instructions to reflect the issues detailed in #28260, as well as a work around using older versions of gcc. I've avoided going into detail as I did not wish to bloat the README, and so that the changes are easy to yank once the issue is resolved.
PR for #28157. At the moment, `rustc` emits a warning when a bare semicolon is encountered (could also be a fail, but I think this is a backwards incompatible change).
Also I am not sure where the best place for a test for that warning would be. Seems run-pass tests do not check warnings.
Give preference to projections from where-clauses over those from trait definitions. This makes #28871 work again, though I think there's more to fix in this general area.
r? @arielb1
cc @brson (fixes regression)
The new bots we have may conflict with one another on base ports, causing tests
to fail. For example the linux-musl-64-opt and linux-64-opt bots are using the
same base port right now, causing some spurious failures every now and then.
Fixes#29184
This adds an error message for the use of the reserved `typeof` keyword, instead of reporting an ICE.
Also adds a `compile-fail` test.
I chose to add a `span_err` instead of removing to parser code, as to preserve the reservation of `typeof`.
It's possible that there is some meaning I'm not grasping from the headers "Traits bounds for generic functions" and "Traits bounds for generic structs", but they seem to me like they could be clearer and more grammatically correct.
Qualified paths allow full path after the `>::`. For example
```rust
<T as Foo>::U::generic_method::<f64>()
```
The example is taken from `test/run-pass/associated-item-long-paths.rs`.
