It was previously asserted that each thread received at least one connection,
but this is not guaranteed to always be the case due to scheduling. This test
also deadlocked on failure due to a lingering reference to the sending half of
the channel, so that reference is now also eagerly dropped so the test can fail
properly if something bad happens.
Closes#16872
This changes the `Add` and `Sub` implementations for `Timespec` introduced in #16573 to use `Duration` as the time span type instead of `Timespec` itself, as [suggested](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/16573#issuecomment-52593408) by @sfackler.
This depends on #16626, because is uses `Duration::seconds(i64)`, whereas currently `Duration::seconds` takes an `i32`.
They were only correct in the simplest case. Some of the optimisations
are certainly possible but should be introduced carefully and only
when the whole pattern codegen infrastructure is in a better shape.
Fixes#16648.
Different Identifiers and Names can have identical textual representations, but different internal representations, due to the macro hygiene machinery (syntax contexts and gensyms). This provides a way to see these internals by compiling with `--pretty expanded,hygiene`.
This is useful for debugging & hacking on macros (e.g. diagnosing https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15750/https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/15962 likely would've been faster with this functionality).
E.g.
```rust
#![feature(macro_rules)]
// minimal junk
#![no_std]
macro_rules! foo {
($x: ident) => { y + $x }
}
fn bar() {
foo!(x)
}
```
```rust
#![feature(macro_rules)]
// minimal junk
#![no_std]
fn bar /* 61#0 */() { y /* 60#2 */ + x /* 58#3 */ }
```
Fixes#12643
> Say!
> I like labelled breaks/continues!
I will use them with a `for` loop.
And I will use with a `loop` loop.
Say! I will use them ANYWHERE!
… _even_ in a `while` loop.
Because they're now supported there.
`--pretty expanded,hygiene` is helpful with debugging macro issues,
since two identifiers/names can be textually the same, but different
internally (resulting in weird "undefined variable" errors).
This unifies the `non_snake_case_functions` and `uppercase_variables` lints into one lint, `non_snake_case`. It also now checks for non-snake-case modules. This also extends the non-camel-case types lint to check type parameters, and merges the `non_uppercase_pattern_statics` lint into the `non_uppercase_statics` lint.
Because the `uppercase_variables` lint is now part of the `non_snake_case` lint, all non-snake-case variables that start with lowercase characters (such as `fooBar`) will now trigger the `non_snake_case` lint.
New code should be updated to use the new `non_snake_case` lint instead of the previous `non_snake_case_functions` and `uppercase_variables` lints. All use of the `non_uppercase_pattern_statics` should be replaced with the `non_uppercase_statics` lint. Any code that previously contained non-snake-case module or variable names should be updated to use snake case names or disable the `non_snake_case` lint. Any code with non-camel-case type parameters should be changed to use camel case or disable the `non_camel_case_types` lint.
This also adds support for lint groups to the compiler. Lint groups are a way of grouping a number of lints together under one name. For example, this also defines a default lint for naming conventions, named `bad_style`. Writing `#[allow(bad_style)]` is equivalent to writing `#[allow(non_camel_case_types, non_snake_case, non_uppercase_statics)]`. These lint groups can also be defined as a compiler plugin using the new `Registry::register_lint_group` method.
This also adds two built-in lint groups, `bad_style` and `unused`. The contents of these groups can be seen by running `rustc -W help`.
[breaking-change]
This adds support for lint groups to the compiler. Lint groups are a way of
grouping a number of lints together under one name. For example, this also
defines a default lint for naming conventions, named `bad_style`. Writing
`#[allow(bad_style)]` is equivalent to writing
`#[allow(non_camel_case_types, non_snake_case, non_uppercase_statics)]`. These
lint groups can also be defined as a compiler plugin using the new
`Registry::register_lint_group` method.
This also adds two built-in lint groups, `bad_style` and `unused`. The contents
of these groups can be seen by running `rustc -W help`.
This unifies the `non_snake_case_functions` and `uppercase_variables` lints
into one lint, `non_snake_case`. It also now checks for non-snake-case modules.
This also extends the non-camel-case types lint to check type parameters, and
merges the `non_uppercase_pattern_statics` lint into the
`non_uppercase_statics` lint.
Because the `uppercase_variables` lint is now part of the `non_snake_case`
lint, all non-snake-case variables that start with lowercase characters (such
as `fooBar`) will now trigger the `non_snake_case` lint.
New code should be updated to use the new `non_snake_case` lint instead of the
previous `non_snake_case_functions` and `uppercase_variables` lints. All use of
the `non_uppercase_pattern_statics` should be replaced with the
`non_uppercase_statics` lint. Any code that previously contained non-snake-case
module or variable names should be updated to use snake case names or disable
the `non_snake_case` lint. Any code with non-camel-case type parameters should
be changed to use camel case or disable the `non_camel_case_types` lint.
[breaking-change]
The inference scheme proposed in <http://smallcultfollowing.com/babysteps/blog/2014/07/09/an-experimental-new-type-inference-scheme-for-rust/>.
This is theoretically a [breaking-change]. It is possible that you may encounter type checking errors, particularly related to closures or functions with higher-ranked lifetimes or object types. Adding more explicit type annotations should help the problem. However, I have not been able to make an example that *actually* successfully compiles with the older scheme and fails with the newer scheme.
f? @pcwalton, @pnkfelix
Previously, this caused methods of re-exported types to not be inserted into
the search index. This fix may introduce some false positives, but in my
testing they appear as orphaned methods and end up not being inserted into the
final search index at a later stage.
Fixes issue #11943
