single_char_insert_str: lint using insert_str() on single-char literals and suggest insert()
Fixes#6026
changelog: add single_char_insert_str lint which lints using string.insert_str() with single char literals and suggests string.insert() with a char
Retagging: do not retag 'raw reborrows'
When doing `&raw const (*raw_ptr).field`, we do not want any retagging; the original provenance should be fully preserved.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/1608
Test added by https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/pull/1614
Not sure whom to ask for review on this... `@oli-obk` can you have a look? Or maybe highfive makes a good choice.^^
add mipsel-unknown-none target
This adds a target for bare MIPS32r2, little endian, softfloat. This target can be used for PIC32 microcontrollers (or possibly for other devices that have a MIPS MCU core such as the M4K core).
Tried to find a name for the target that is in line with the naming scheme apparently used for the other MIPS targets.
r? `@jonas-schievink`
Fix ICE when a future-incompat-report has its command-line level capped
Fixes#78660
With PR https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/75534 merged, we now run
more lint-related code for future-incompat-report, even when their final
level is Allow. Some lint-related code was not expecting `Level::Allow`,
and had an explicit panic.
This PR explicitly tracks the lint level set on the command line before
`--cap-lints` is applied. This is used to emit a more precise error
note (e.g. we don't say that `-W lint-name` was specified on the
command line just because a lint was capped to Warn). As a result, we
can now correctly emit a note that `-A` was used if we got
`Level::Allow` from the command line (before the cap is applied).
Document -Zinstrument-coverage
r? ``@tmandry``
FYI ``@wesleywiser``
Here is my proposed document for LLVM source-based code coverage.
I based it on the `profile.md` page, in the same directory, and on the Clang guide for LLVM source-based coverage.
Treat trailing semicolon as a statement in macro call
See #61733 (comment)
We now preserve the trailing semicolon in a macro invocation, even if
the macro expands to nothing. As a result, the following code no longer
compiles:
```rust
macro_rules! empty {
() => { }
}
fn foo() -> bool { //~ ERROR mismatched
{ true } //~ ERROR mismatched
empty!();
}
```
Previously, `{ true }` would be considered the trailing expression, even
though there's a semicolon in `empty!();`
This makes macro expansion more token-based.
foreign_modules query hash table lookups
When compiling a large monolithic crate we're seeing huge times in the `foreign_modules` query due to repeated iteration over foreign modules (in order to find a module by its id). This implements hash table lookups so that which massively reduces time spent in that query in this particular case. We'll need to see if the overhead of creating the hash table has a negative impact on performance in more normal compilation scenarios.
I'm working with `@wesleywiser` on this.
Expand `NtExpr` tokens only in key-value attributes
Implement the experiment described in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55414#issuecomment-554005412
This PR also removes some customization points and token visiting functionality from AST visitors.
Read-only visitor no longer visits tokens, mutable visitor visits tokens only when specifically enabled, mutable token visiting is restricted to its single intended use case.
I haven't changed the representation of `MacArgs::Eq` yet, but it potentially can use a `TokenTree` or a `Token` instead of `TokenStream`.
It's hard to get rid of `Nonterminal::NtExpr` there (and e.g. replace it with `ast::Expr`) due to the dual nature of key-value attributes (the value is both an expression and a token stream, depending on context), and `Nonterminal` has all the machinery for maintaining both representations in sync.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/55414
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/43860
Fixes#78675
We now bail out of `prepend_attrs` if we ended up capturing any inner
attributes (which can happen in several places, due to token capturing
for `macro_rules!` arguments.
See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/61733#issuecomment-716188981
We now preserve the trailing semicolon in a macro invocation, even if
the macro expands to nothing. As a result, the following code no longer
compiles:
```rust
macro_rules! empty {
() => { }
}
fn foo() -> bool { //~ ERROR mismatched
{ true } //~ ERROR mismatched
empty!();
}
```
Previously, `{ true }` would be considered the trailing expression, even
though there's a semicolon in `empty!();`
This makes macro expansion more token-based.
