Cleanup themes (tooltip)
No changes in the UI. I used this opportunity to unify the dark theme with the others for the alpha parameter though.
r? `@notriddle`
Tweak future opaque ty pretty printing
1. The `Return` type of a generator doesn't need to be a lang item just for diagnostic printing of types
2. We shouldn't suppress the `Output = Ty` of a opaque future if the type is a int or float var.
Initial implementation of return-position `impl Trait` in traits
* Create a new item kind, called `ImplTraitPlaceholder`, which is used to lower `ast::TyKind::ImplTrait` in trait method returns.
* This item is the child of the trait method, which simplifies the way we calculate bounds and stuff.
* Use the def-id of this type to construct a projection type that we use during astconv for the return type of the trait method signature.
* Implement logic to normalize this `ImplTraitPlaceholder` projection type when we know its concrete impl (this is pretty limited currently, but really there are no other selection candidates that make sense -- for now!)
* Check that the `impl Trait`'s bounds are satisfied on the concrete type provided in the impl.
This is obviously nowhere near complete, but I wanted to at least get some initial support landed so we can start playing around with it.
What works:
* async fn in trait and RPITIT, including multiple `impl Trait`s and `impl Trait` nested in associated type bindings, like `impl Future<Output = impl Sized>`
These two type names are long and have long matching prefixes. I find
them hard to read, especially in combinations like
`AttrAnnotatedTokenStream::new(vec![AttrAnnotatedTokenTree::Token(..)])`.
This commit renames them as `AttrToken{Stream,Tree}`.
Reimplement `carrying_add` and `borrowing_sub` for signed integers.
As per the discussion in #85532, this PR reimplements `carrying_add` and `borrowing_sub` for signed integers.
It also adds unit tests for both unsigned and signed integers, emphasing on the behaviours of the methods.
Fix `range_{plus,minus}_one` bad suggestions
Fixes#9431.
The current `range_plus_one` and `range_minus_one` suggestions are completely incorrect when macros are involved.
This commit resolves this by disabling the lints for any range expression that is expanded from a macro. The reasons for this are that it is very difficult to create a correct suggestion in this case and that false negatives are less important for pedantic lints.
changelog: Fix `range_{plus,minus}_one` bad suggestions
Make `Debug` impl for `Term` useful
because `Term { ptr: 78942378998734298342, maker: PhantomData, }` does not excel at communicating the necessary information
