clean up the borrowing in rustc_hir_pretty
A whole lot of the `&`s and `ref`s were redundant. I hope doing this in one big commit is fine, because all of the changes are pretty self-contained.
`@rustbot` label: +C-cleanup
fix interpreter validity check on Box
Follow-up to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/98554: avoid walking over parts of the value twice.
And then move all that logic into the general visitor so not each visitor implementation has to deal with it...
Interpret: AllocRange Debug impl, and use it more consistently
The two commits are pretty independent but it did not seem worth having two PRs for them.
r? ``@oli-obk``
more `need_type_info` improvements
this now deals with macros in suggestions and the source cost computation does what I want for `channel` 🎉
r? ``@estebank``
Implement `FusedIterator` for `std::net::[Into]Incoming`
They never return `None`, so they trivially fulfill the contract.
What should I put for the stability attribute of `Incoming`?
Add method to mutate MIR body without invalidating CFG caches.
In addition to adding this method, a handful of passes are updated to use it. There's still quite a few passes that could in principle make use of this as well, but do not at the moment because they use `VisitorMut` or `MirPatch`, which needs additional support for this.
The method name is slightly unwieldy, but I don't expect anyone to be writing it a lot, and at least it says what it does. If anyone has a suggestion for a better name though, would be happy to rename.
r? rust-lang/mir-opt
incr.comp.: Make split-dwarf commandline options [TRACKED].
This commandline options have an influence on the contents of object files (and .dwo files), so they need to be `[TRACKED]`.
r? `@davidtwco`
rustdoc: Censor certain complex unevaluated const exprs
Fixes#97933.
This is more of a hotfix for the aforementioned issue. By that, I mean that my proposed patch is
not the best solution but one that does not change as much existing code.
It treats symptoms rather than the root cause.
This PR “censors” certain complex unevaluated constant expressions like `match`es, blocks, function calls, struct literals etc. by pretty-printing them as `_` / `{ _ }` (number and string literals, paths and `()` are still printed as one would expect).
Resorting to this placeholder is preferable to printing the full expression verbatim since
they can be quite large and verbose resulting in an unreadable mess in the generated documentation.
Further, mindlessly printing the const would leak private and `doc(hidden)` struct fields (#97933), at least in the current
stable & nightly implementations which rely on `span_to_snippet` (!) and `rustc_hir_pretty::id_to_string`.
The censoring of _verbose_ expressions is probably going to stay longer term.
However, in regards to private and `doc(hidden)` struct fields, I have a more proper fix in mind
which I have already partially implemented locally and for which I am going to open a separate PR sometime soon.
For that, I was already in contact with `@GuillaumeGomez.`
The proper fix involves rustdoc not falling back on pretty-printing unevaluated consts so easily (what this PR is concerned about)
and instead preferring to print evaluated consts which contain more information allowing it to selectively hide private and `doc(hidden)` fields, create hyperlinks etc. generally making the output more granular and precise (compared to the brutal `_` placeholder).
Unfortunately, I was a bit too late and the issue just hit stable (1.62).
Should this be backported to beta or even a potential 1.62.1?
r? `@GuillaumeGomez`
Lint against executable files in the root directory
This avoids accidental introduction (such as in #97488) of executable files into the root directory, not just under library/, src/ or compiler/.
Resolves#98792
interpret: don't rely on ScalarPair for overflowed arithmetic
This is for https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/97861.
Cc `@eddyb`
I would like to avoid making this depend on `dest.layout.abi` to avoid a branch that we are not usually covering both sides of. Though OTOH this seems like fairly straight-forward code. But let's benchmark this option first to see how bad that extra `force_allocation` really is.
This ensure that it will run the Windows executable if other files in the directory (such as Linux executables) have the same file name minus the extension.
Only obey optimize-tests flag on UI tests that are run-pass
stage1 UI tests walltime on my machine:
```
optimize-tests = false, master
25.98s
optimize-tests = true, master
34.69s
optimize-tests = true, patched
28.79s
```
Effects:
- faster UI tests
- llvm asserts get exercised less on build-pass tests
- the difference between opt and nopt builds shrinks a bit
- aux libs don't get optimized since they don't have a pass mode and almost never have explicit compile flags
