add str to common types
I already expected this to be the case and it may slightly improve perf.
Afaict if we ever want to change str into a lang item this would have to get reverted.
As that would be fairly simple I don't believe this to cause any problems in the future.
Refactor `try_find` a little
~~This works like `find_map`, but mapping to a `Try` type. It stops when `Ok` is `Some(value)`, with an additional short-circuit on `Try::Error`. This is similar to the unstable `try_find`, but has the advantage of being able to directly return the user's `R: Try` type directly, rather than converting to `Result`.~~
(removed -- `try_find_map` was declined in review)
This PR also refactors `try_find` a little to match style. The `E` type parameter was unnecessary, so it's now removed. The folding closure now has reduced parametricity on just `T = Self::Item`, rather
than the whole `Self` iterator type. There's otherwise no functional change in this.
Specialization is unsound
As discussed in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/31844#issuecomment-617013949, it might be a good idea to warn users of specialization that the feature they are using is unsound.
I also expanded the "incomplete feature" warning to link the user to the tracking issue.
It turns out that this has not been working for who knows how long.
Previously:
```
pub fn h() { 1 + 2; }
```
After this change:
```
pub fn h() { loop {} }
```
This only affected the pass when run with the command line
pretty-printing option, so rustdoc was still replacing bodies with
`loop {}`.
Rollup of 13 pull requests
Successful merges:
- #71568 (Document unsafety in slice/sort.rs)
- #72709 (`#[deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]` in liballoc)
- #73214 (Add asm!() support for hexagon)
- #73248 (save_analysis: improve handling of enum struct variant)
- #73257 (ty: projections in `transparent_newtype_field`)
- #73261 (Suggest `?Sized` when applicable for ADTs)
- #73300 (Implement crate-level-only lints checking.)
- #73334 (Note numeric literals that can never fit in an expected type)
- #73357 (Use `LocalDefId` for import IDs in trait map)
- #73364 (asm: Allow multiple template string arguments; interpret them as newline-separated)
- #73382 (Only display other method receiver candidates if they actually apply)
- #73465 (Add specialization of `ToString for char`)
- #73489 (Refactor hir::Place)
Failed merges:
r? @ghost
The `E` type parameter was unnecessary, so it's now removed. The folding
closure now has reduced parametricity on just `T = Self::Item`, rather
than the whole `Self` iterator type. There's otherwise no functional
change in this.
ty: projections in `transparent_newtype_field`
Fixes#73249.
This PR modifies `transparent_newtype_field` so that it handles
projections with generic parameters, where `normalize_erasing_regions`
would ICE.
Replaced dummy values for hash and num_counters with computed values,
and refactored InstrumentCoverage pass to simplify injecting more
counters per function in upcoming versions.
Improved usage documentation and error messaging.
Refactor hir::Place
For the following code
```rust
let c = || bar(foo.x, foo.x)
```
We generate two different `hir::Place`s for both `foo.x`.
Handling this adds overhead for analysis we need to do for RFC 2229.
We also want to store type information at each Projection to support
analysis as part of the RFC. This resembles what we have for
`mir::Place`
This commit modifies the Place as follows:
- Rename to `PlaceWithHirId`, where there `hir_id` is that of the
expressioin.
- Move any other information that describes the access out to another
struct now called `Place`.
- Removed `Span`, it can be accessed using the [hir
API](https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/nightly-rustc/rustc_middle/hir/map/struct.Map.html#method.span)
- Modify `Projection` to be a strucutre of its own, that currently only
contains the `ProjectionKind`.
Adding type information to projections wil be completed as part of https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/5
Closes https://github.com/rust-lang/project-rfc-2229/issues/3
Only display other method receiver candidates if they actually apply
Previously, we would suggest `Box<Self>` as a valid receiver, even if
method resolution only succeeded due to an autoderef (e.g. to `&self`)
asm: Allow multiple template string arguments; interpret them as newline-separated
Allow the `asm!` macro to accept a series of template arguments, and interpret them as if they were concatenated with a '\n' between them. This allows writing an `asm!` where each line of assembly appears in a separate template string argument.
This syntax makes it possible for rustfmt to reliably format and indent each line of assembly, without risking changes to the inside of a template string. It also avoids the complexity of having the user carefully format and indent a multi-line string (including where to put the surrounding quotes), and avoids the extra indentation and lines of a call to `concat!`.
For example, rewriting the second example from the [blog post on the new inline assembly syntax](https://blog.rust-lang.org/inside-rust/2020/06/08/new-inline-asm.html) using multiple template strings:
```rust
fn main() {
let mut bits = [0u8; 64];
for value in 0..=1024u64 {
let popcnt;
unsafe {
asm!(
" popcnt {popcnt}, {v}",
"2:",
" blsi rax, {v}",
" jz 1f",
" xor {v}, rax",
" tzcnt rax, rax",
" stosb",
" jmp 2b",
"1:",
v = inout(reg) value => _,
popcnt = out(reg) popcnt,
out("rax") _, // scratch
inout("rdi") bits.as_mut_ptr() => _,
);
}
println!("bits of {}: {:?}", value, &bits[0..popcnt]);
}
}
```
Note that all the template strings must appear before all other arguments; you cannot, for instance, provide a series of template strings intermixed with the corresponding operands.
Note numeric literals that can never fit in an expected type
re https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/72380#discussion_r438289385
Given the toy code
```rust
fn is_positive(n: usize) {
n > -1_isize;
}
```
We currently get a type mismatch error like the following:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> src/main.rs:2:9
|
2 | n > -1_isize;
| ^^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found `isize`
|
help: you can convert an `isize` to `usize` and panic if the converted value wouldn't fit
|
2 | n > (-1_isize).try_into().unwrap();
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
```
But clearly, `-1` can never fit into a `usize`, so the suggestion will
always panic. A more useful message would tell the user that the value
can never fit in the expected type:
```
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> test.rs:2:9
|
2 | n > -1_isize;
| ^^^^^^^^ expected `usize`, found `isize`
|
note: `-1_isize` can never fit into `usize`
--> test.rs:2:9
|
2 | n > -1_isize;
| ^^^^^^^^
```
Which is what this commit implements.
I only added this check for negative literals because
- Currently we can only perform such a check for literals (constant
value propagation is outside the scope of the typechecker at this
point)
- A lint error for out-of-range numeric literals is already emitted
IMO it makes more sense to put this check in librustc_lint, but as far
as I can tell the typecheck pass happens before the lint pass, so I've
added it here.
r? @estebank
Implement crate-level-only lints checking.
This implements a crate_level_only flag on lints, and when it is true, it becomes an error when user tries to specify this flag upon nodes other than crate node.
This also turns on this flag for all non_ascii_ident lints.
ty: projections in `transparent_newtype_field`
Fixes#73249.
This PR modifies `transparent_newtype_field` so that it handles
projections with generic parameters, where `normalize_erasing_regions`
would ICE.
`#[deny(unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn)]` in liballoc
This PR proposes to make use of the new `unsafe_op_in_unsafe_fn` lint, i.e. no longer consider the body of an unsafe function as an unsafe block and require explicit unsafe block to perform unsafe operations.
This has been first (partly) suggested by @Mark-Simulacrum in https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/69245#issuecomment-587817065
Tracking issue for the feature: #71668.
~~Blocked on #71862.~~
r? @Mark-Simulacrum cc @nikomatsakis can you confirm that those changes are desirable? Should I restrict it to only BTree for the moment?
Document unsafety in slice/sort.rs
Let me know if these documentations are accurate c:
I don't think I am capable enough to document the safety of `partition_blocks`, however.
Related issue #66219
