fmt::Show is for debugging, and can and should be implemented for
all public types. This trait is used with `{:?}` syntax. There still
exists #[derive(Show)].
fmt::String is for types that faithfully be represented as a String.
Because of this, there is no way to derive fmt::String, all
implementations must be purposeful. It is used by the default format
syntax, `{}`.
This will break most instances of `{}`, since that now requires the type
to impl fmt::String. In most cases, replacing `{}` with `{:?}` is the
correct fix. Types that were being printed specifically for users should
receive a fmt::String implementation to fix this.
Part of #20013
[breaking-change]
check it more easily; also extend object safety to cover sized types
as well as static methods. This makes it sufficient so that we can
always ensure that `Foo : Foo` holds for any trait `Foo`.
This prints out a transformed version of the input source code where
every function body is replaced with `loop { }`.
All such bodies are (1.) trivial and (2.) guaranteed to pass the
type-checker in a valid compiler; therefore they make very nice input
to start with when narrowing down a bug exposed by a large test input
(such as librustc itself).
This commit takes a second pass through the `std::option` module to fully
stabilize any lingering methods inside of it.
These items were made stable as-is
* Some
* None
* as_mut
* expect
* unwrap
* unwrap_or
* unwrap_or_else
* map
* map_or
* map_or_else
* and_then
* or_else
* unwrap_or_default
* Default implementation
* FromIterator implementation
* Copy implementation
These items were made stable with modifications
* iter - now returns a struct called Iter
* iter_mut - now returns a struct called IterMut
* into_iter - now returns a struct called IntoIter, Clone is never implemented
This is a breaking change due to the modifications to the names of the iterator
types returned. Code referencing the old names should updated to referencing the
newer names instead. This is also a breaking change due to the fact that
`IntoIter` no longer implements the `Clone` trait.
These items were explicitly not stabilized
* as_slice - waiting on indexing conventions
* as_mut_slice - waiting on conventions with as_slice as well
* cloned - the API was still just recently added
* ok_or - API remains experimental
* ok_or_else - API remains experimental
[breaking-change]
This change makes the compiler no longer infer whether types (structures
and enumerations) implement the `Copy` trait (and thus are implicitly
copyable). Rather, you must implement `Copy` yourself via `impl Copy for
MyType {}`.
A new warning has been added, `missing_copy_implementations`, to warn
you if a non-generic public type has been added that could have
implemented `Copy` but didn't.
For convenience, you may *temporarily* opt out of this behavior by using
`#![feature(opt_out_copy)]`. Note though that this feature gate will never be
accepted and will be removed by the time that 1.0 is released, so you should
transition your code away from using it.
This breaks code like:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
Change this code to:
#[deriving(Show)]
struct Point2D {
x: int,
y: int,
}
impl Copy for Point2D {}
fn main() {
let mypoint = Point2D {
x: 1,
y: 1,
};
let otherpoint = mypoint;
println!("{}{}", mypoint, otherpoint);
}
This is the backwards-incompatible part of #13231.
Part of RFC #3.
[breaking-change]
