Previously whenever a duplicate discriminant was detected for an Enum,
we would print the discriminant bits in the diagnostic without any
casting. This caused us to display incorrect values for negative
discriminants. After this PR we format the discriminant signedness
correctly. Also reworded some of the original error
messages.
Try to cache region_scope_tree as a query
This PR will attempt to restore `region_scope_tree` as a query so that caching works again. It seems that `region_scope_tree` could be re-computed for nested items after all, which could explain the performance regression introduced by #95563.
cc `@Mark-Simulacrum` `@pnkfelix` I will try to trigger a perf run here.
macros: introduce `fluent_messages` macro
Adds a new `fluent_messages` macro which performs compile-time validation of the compiler's Fluent resources (i.e. that the resources parse and don't multiply define the same messages) and generates constants that make using those messages in diagnostics more ergonomic.
For example, given the following invocation of the macro..
```rust
fluent_messages! {
typeck => "./typeck.ftl",
}
```
..where `typeck.ftl` has the following contents..
```fluent
typeck-field-multiply-specified-in-initializer =
field `{$ident}` specified more than once
.label = used more than once
.label-previous-use = first use of `{$ident}`
```
...then the macro parse the Fluent resource, emitting a diagnostic if it fails to do so...
```text
error: could not parse Fluent resource
--> $DIR/test.rs:35:28
|
LL | missing_message => "./missing-message.ftl",
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
= help: see additional errors emitted
error: expected a message field for "missing-message"
--> ./missing-message.ftl:1:1
|
1 | missing-message =
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
```
...or generating the following code if it succeeds:
```rust
pub static DEFAULT_LOCALE_RESOURCES: &'static [&'static str] = &[
include_str!("./typeck.ftl"),
];
mod fluent_generated {
mod typeck {
pub const field_multiply_specified_in_initializer: DiagnosticMessage =
DiagnosticMessage::fluent("typeck-field-multiply-specified-in-initializer");
pub const field_multiply_specified_in_initializer_label_previous_use: DiagnosticMessage =
DiagnosticMessage::fluent_attr(
"typeck-field-multiply-specified-in-initializer",
"previous-use-label"
);
}
}
```
When emitting a diagnostic, the generated constants can be used as follows:
```rust
let mut err = sess.struct_span_err(
span,
fluent::typeck::field_multiply_specified_in_initializer
);
err.span_label(
span,
fluent::typeck::field_multiply_specified_in_initializer_label
);
err.span_label(
previous_use_span,
fluent::typeck::field_multiply_specified_in_initializer_label_previous_use
);
err.emit();
```
I'd like to reduce the verbosity of referring to labels/notes/helps with this scheme (though it wasn't much better before), but I'll leave that for a follow-up.
r? `@oli-obk`
cc `@pvdrz` `@compiler-errors`
Move various checks to typeck so them failing causes the typeck result to get tainted
Fixes#69487fixes#79047
cc `@RalfJung` this gets rid of the `Transmute` invalid program error variant
Output correct type responsible for structural match violation
Previously we included the outermost type that caused a structural match violation in the error message and stated that that type must be annotated with `#[derive(Eq, PartialEq)]` even if it already had that annotation. This PR outputs the correct type in the error message.
Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/97278
Do writeback of Closure params before visiting the parent expression
This means that given the expression:
```
let x = |a: Vec<_>| {};
```
We will visit the HIR node for `a` before `x`, and report the ambiguity on the former instead of the latter. This also moves writeback for struct field ids and const blocks before, but the ordering of this and walking the expr doesn't seem to matter.
Use new typed Fluent identifiers for the "missing type parameters"
diagnostic in the typeck crate which was manually creating
`DiagnosticMessage`s previously.
Signed-off-by: David Wood <david.wood@huawei.com>
Lifetime variance fixes for rustc
#97287 migrates rustc to a `Ty` type that is invariant over its lifetime `'tcx`, so I need to fix a bunch of places that assume that `Ty<'a>` and `Ty<'b>` can be unified by shortening both to some common lifetime.
This is doable, since many lifetimes are already `'tcx`, so all this PR does is be a bit more explicit that elided lifetimes are actually `'tcx`.
Split out from #97287 so the compiler team can review independently.
Remove `crate` visibility modifier
FCP to remove this syntax is just about complete in #53120. Once it completes, this should be merged ASAP to avoid merge conflicts.
The first two commits remove usage of the feature in this repository, while the last removes the feature itself.
Drop Tracking: Implement `fake_read` callback
This PR updates drop tracking's use of `ExprUseVisitor` so that we treat `fake_read` events as borrows. Without doing this, we were not handling match expressions correctly, which showed up as a breakage in the `addassign-yield.rs` test. We did not previously notice this because we still had rather large temporary scopes that we held borrows for, which changed in #94309.
This PR also includes a variant of the `addassign-yield.rs` test case to make sure we continue to have correct behavior here with drop tracking.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
generator_interior: Count match pattern bindings as borrowed for the whole guard expression
The test case `yielding-in-match-guard.rs` was failing with `-Zdrop-tracking` enabled. The reason is that the copy of a local (`y`) was not counted as a borrow in typeck, while MIR did consider this as borrowed.
The correct thing to do here is to count pattern bindings are borrowed for the whole guard. Instead, what we were doing is to record the type at the use site of the variable and check if the variable comes from a borrowed pattern. Due to the fix for #57017, we were considering too small of a scope for this variable, which meant it was not counted as borrowed.
Because we now unconditionally record the borrow, rather than only for bindings that are used, this PR is also able to remove a lot of the logic around match bindings that was there before.
r? `@nikomatsakis`
`simplify_type` improvements and cursed docs
the existing `TreatParams` enum pretty much mixes everything up. Not sure why this looked right to me in #94057
This also includes two changes which impact perf:
- `ty::Projection` with inference vars shouldn't be treated as a rigid type, even if fully normalized
- `ty::Placeholder` only unifies with itself, so actually return `Some` for them
r? `@nikomatsakis`
Permit `asm_const` and `asm_sym` to reference generic params
Related #96557
These constructs will be allowed:
```rust
fn foofoo<const N: usize>() {}
unsafe fn foo<const N: usize>() {
asm!("/* {0} */", const N);
asm!("/* {0} */", const N + 1);
asm!("/* {0} */", sym foofoo::<N>);
}
fn barbar<T>() {}
unsafe fn bar<T>() {
asm!("/* {0} */", const std::mem::size_of::<T>());
asm!("/* {0} */", const std::mem::size_of::<(T, T)>());
asm!("/* {0} */", sym barbar::<T>);
asm!("/* {0} */", sym barbar::<(T, T)>);
}
```
`@Amanieu,` I didn't switch inline asms to use `DefKind::InlineAsm`, as I see little value doing that; given that no type inference is needed, it will only make typecking slower and more complex but will have no real gains. I did switch them to follow the same code path as inline asm during symbol resolution, though.
The `error: unconstrained generic constant` you mentioned in #76001 is due to the fact that `to_const` will actually add a wfness obligation to the constant, which we don't need for `asm_const`, so I have that removed.
`@rustbot` label: +A-inline-assembly +F-asm
Mention traits and types involved in unstable trait upcasting
Fixes#95972 by printing the traits being upcasted and the types being coerced that cause that upcasting...
---
the poor span mentioned in the original issue has nothing to do with trait upcasting diagnostic here...
> The original example I had that made me run into this issue had an even longer expression there (multiple chained
iterator methods) which just got all highlighted as one big block saying "somewhere here trait coercion is used and it's not allowed".
I don't think I can solve that issue in general without fixing the ObligationCauseCode and span that gets passed into Coerce.
