While we are not yet ready for compiler i18n, this also keeps the error handling code clean. The set of altered error messages was obtained by grepping for `"s"` and `(s)`, so there might be some missing messages.
syntax: make match arms store the expr directly.
Previously `ast::Arm` was always storing a single `ast::Expr` wrapped in an
`ast::Block` (for historical reasons, AIUI), so we might as just store
that expr directly.
Closes#3085.
Previously `ast::Arm` was always storing a single `ast::Expr` wrapped in an
`ast::Block` (for historical reasons, AIUI), so we might as just store
that expr directly.
Closes#3085.
The incompatibility of rust-mode with global-whitespace-mode warned
about in the README was actually fixed by commit 581b3db3b3. Remove the
warning from the README and close#3994.
The incompatibility of rust-mode with global-whitespace-mode warned
about in the README was actually fixed by commit 581b3db3b3. Remove the
warning from the README and close#3994.
A couple of syntax extensions manually expanded expressions, but it
wasn't done universally, most noticably inside of asm!().
There's also a bit of random cleanup.
A couple of syntax extensions manually expanded expressions, but it
wasn't done universally, most noticably inside of asm!().
There's also a bit of random cleanup.
According to `/etc/terminfo/README`,
```
This directory is for system-local terminfo descriptions. By default,
ncurses will search ${HOME}/.terminfo first, then /etc/terminfo (this
directory), then /lib/terminfo, and last not least /usr/share/terminfo.
```
This commit let librustc automatically pickup LDFLAGS dependencies
inherited from LLVM, which may otherwise result in undefined
references to external symbols under certain linking environment.
A symptom of this issue is eg. a failure when trying to link against
librustc (due to unresolved ffi_* symbols), while using a system-wide
LLVM.
Signed-off-by: Luca Bruno <lucab@debian.org>
This commit let librustc automatically pickup LDFLAGS dependencies
inherited from LLVM, which may otherwise result in undefined
references to external symbols under certain linking environment.
A symptom of this issue is eg. a failure when trying to link against
librustc (due to unresolved ffi_*i symbols), while using a system-wide
LLVM.
Signed-off-by: Luca Bruno <lucab@debian.org>
Macro definitions are just their raw source code, and so should be
highlighted where possible. Also, $ident non-terminal substitutions are
special, and so are worthy of a little special treatment.
When the metadata format changes, old libraries often cause librustc to abort
when reading their metadata. This should all change with the introduction of SVH
markers, but the loader for crates should gracefully handle libraries without
SVH markers still.
This commit adds support for tripping fewer assertions when loading libraries by
using maybe_get_doc when initially parsing metadata. It's still possible for
some libraries to fall through the cracks, but this should deal with a fairly
large number of them up front.
When the metadata format changes, old libraries often cause librustc to abort
when reading their metadata. This should all change with the introduction of SVH
markers, but the loader for crates should gracefully handle libraries without
SVH markers still.
This commit adds support for tripping fewer assertions when loading libraries by
using maybe_get_doc when initially parsing metadata. It's still possible for
some libraries to fall through the cracks, but this should deal with a fairly
large number of them up front.
Macro definitions are just their raw source code, and so should be
highlighted where possible. Also, $ident non-terminal substitutions are
special, and so are worth of a little special treatment.
Now that we can call `flush()` in destructors, I think that it's appropriate for stdout/stderr to return buffered writers by default.
This doesn't enable certain functionality like a buffered stdin does, but it's what you want 90% of the time for performance reasons.
Similarly to #12422 which made stdin buffered by default, this commit makes the
output streams also buffered by default. Now that buffered writers will flush
their contents when they are dropped, I don't believe that there's no reason why
the output shouldn't be buffered by default, which is what you want in 90% of
cases.
As with stdin, there are new stdout_raw() and stderr_raw() functions to get
unbuffered streams to stdout/stderr.
It's still not entirely clear what should happen if there was an error when
flushing, but I'm deferring that decision to #12628. I believe that it's crucial
for the usefulness of buffered writers to be able to flush on drop. It's just
too easy to forget to flush them in small one-off use cases.
cc #12628
We weren't passing the node id for the enum and hence it couldn't retrieve the field types for the struct variant we were trying to destructure.
Fixes#11577.
From my comment on #11450:
The reason for the ICE is because for operators `rustc` does a little bit of magic. Notice that while you implement the `Mul` trait for some type `&T` (i.e a reference to some T), you can simply do `Vec2 {..} * 2.0f32`. That is, `2.0f32` is `f32` and not `&f32`. This works because `rustc` will automatically take a reference. So what's happening is that with `foo * T`, the compiler is expecting the `mul` method to take some `&U` and then it can compare to make sure `T == U` (or more specifically that `T` coerces to `U`). But in this case, the argument of the `mul` method is not a reference and hence the "no ref" error.
I don't think we should ICE in this case since we do catch the mismatched trait/impl method and hence provide a better error message that way.
Fixes#11450
Formatting via reflection has been a little questionable for some time now, and
it's a little unfortunate that one of the standard macros will silently use
reflection when you weren't expecting it. This adds small bits of code bloat to
libraries, as well as not always being necessary. In light of this information,
this commit switches assert_eq!() to using {} in the error message instead of
{:?}.
In updating existing code, there were a few error cases that I encountered:
* It's impossible to define Show for [T, ..N]. I think DST will alleviate this
because we can define Show for [T].
* A few types here and there just needed a #[deriving(Show)]
* Type parameters needed a Show bound, I often moved this to `assert!(a == b)`
* `Path` doesn't implement `Show`, so assert_eq!() cannot be used on two paths.
I don't think this is much of a regression though because {:?} on paths looks
awful (it's a byte array).
Concretely speaking, this shaved 10K off a 656K binary. Not a lot, but sometime
significant for smaller binaries.
Formatting via reflection has been a little questionable for some time now, and
it's a little unfortunate that one of the standard macros will silently use
reflection when you weren't expecting it. This adds small bits of code bloat to
libraries, as well as not always being necessary. In light of this information,
this commit switches assert_eq!() to using {} in the error message instead of
{:?}.
In updating existing code, there were a few error cases that I encountered:
* It's impossible to define Show for [T, ..N]. I think DST will alleviate this
because we can define Show for [T].
* A few types here and there just needed a #[deriving(Show)]
* Type parameters needed a Show bound, I often moved this to `assert!(a == b)`
* `Path` doesn't implement `Show`, so assert_eq!() cannot be used on two paths.
I don't think this is much of a regression though because {:?} on paths looks
awful (it's a byte array).
Concretely speaking, this shaved 10K off a 656K binary. Not a lot, but sometime
significant for smaller binaries.
