rustbuild: Add install target. #34675
It just prints to the screen currently.
r? @alexcrichton
I'm working on the next commit to actually have it install.
This commit blanket renames the `rustc_macro` infrastructure to `proc_macro`,
which reflects the general consensus of #35900. A follow up PR to Cargo will be
required to purge the `rustc-macro` name as well.
* Don't spawn two threads for all tests, just one now that `catch_unwind` is
stable.
* Remove usage of the unstable `box` keyword
* Remove usage of the unstable `FnBox` trait
Fixed small typo in `BufRead` comments
`BufRead` comments, in the `Seek` trait implementation, was talking about allocating 8 *ebibytes*. It was a typo, the correct unit is *exbibytes*, since *ebibytes* don't even exist. The calculation is correct, though.
Fix rustbuild per-target musl root
In #36292, support was added to target musl libc for ARM targets using rustbuild. Specifically, that change allowed the addition of per-target `musl-root` options in the rustbuild `config.toml` so that multiple targets depending on musl could be built. However, that implementation contained a couple of omissions: the `musl-root` option was added to the config, but was never added to the TOML parsing, and therefore was not actually being loaded from `config.toml`. This PR rectifies that.
Using these changes and a heavily modified version of the buildbot Docker container, I have been able to build rust targeting `armv7-unknown-linux-musleabihf` and have successfully run the binaries on a Raspberry Pi 3. I'm also planning to test `arm-unknown-linux-musleabi` and `arm-unknown-linux-musleabihf` systems, but have no reason to believe that this change would not simply work on those targets.
Add testcase for issue-32948
issue-32948 is similar to issue-32554.
issue-32948 : Symbol names for monomorphized trait impls are not stable across crates
issue-32554 : Symbol names for generics are not stable across crates
so, I append issue-32948's testcase to issue-32554's testcase.
thanks!
Restore `DISCONNECTED` state in `oneshot::Packet::send`
Closes#32114
I'm not sure if this is the best approach, but the current action of swapping `DISCONNECTED` with `DATA` seems wrong. Additionally, it is strange that the `send` method (and others in the `oneshot` module) takes `&mut self` despite performing atomic operations, as this requires extra discipline to avoid data races and lets us use methods like `AtomicUsize::get_mut` instead of methods that require a memory ordering.
`BufRead` comments, in the `Seek` trait implementation, was talking
about allocating 8 *ebibytes*. It was a typo, the correct unit is
*exbibytes*, since *ebibytes* don't even exist. The calculation is
correct, though.
stop having identity casts be lexprs
that made no sense (see test), and was incompatible with borrowck.
Fixes#36936.
beta-nominated since (bad) regression.
r? @eddyb
