Commit Graph

767 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ouz-a
d59c7ff000 Remove mir::CastKind::Misc 2022-10-06 15:32:41 +03:00
bors
0152393048 Auto merge of #99324 - reez12g:issue-99144, r=jyn514
Enable doctests in compiler/ crates

Helps with https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99144
2022-10-06 03:01:57 +00:00
Ralf Jung
a0131f0a36 change might_permit_raw_init to fully detect LLVM UB, but not more than that 2022-10-05 09:22:50 +02:00
Dylan DPC
32dde232d8
Rollup merge of #102559 - compiler-errors:issue-102553, r=oli-obk
Don't ICE when trying to copy unsized value in const prop

When we have a trivially false where-clause predicate like `Self: Sized` where `Self = dyn Trait`, we sometimes don't throw an error during typeck for an illegal operation such as copying an unsized type.

This, unfortunately, cannot be made into an error (at least not without some migration -- see #95611 for example), but we should at least not ICE, since this function will never actually be reachable from main, for example.

r? `@RalfJung` since I think you added these assertions? but feel free to reassign.

Fixes #102553
2022-10-04 16:11:02 +05:30
Michael Goulet
c7d1ec009c Don't ICE when trying to copy unsized value in const prop 2022-10-02 19:21:06 +00:00
Cameron Steffen
4f12de0660 Change feature name to is_some_and 2022-10-01 11:45:52 -05:00
Maybe Waffle
a8f7e244b7 Refactor rustc lint API 2022-10-01 10:03:06 +00:00
reez12g
00612e23cb Mark ignore(illustrative) on docs in compiler/rustc_const_eval/src/interpret/validity.rs 2022-09-29 16:49:23 +09:00
reez12g
9a4c5abe45 Remove from compiler/ crates 2022-09-29 16:49:04 +09:00
Pietro Albini
3975d55d98
remove cfg(bootstrap) 2022-09-26 10:14:45 +02:00
fee1-dead
b7d9de72ac
Rollup merge of #102194 - fee1-dead-contrib:improve-const-drop, r=oli-obk
Note the type when unable to drop values in compile time
2022-09-25 22:06:39 +08:00
Deadbeef
2ce1cd511f Note the type when unable to drop values in compile time 2022-09-24 20:32:51 +00:00
bors
9a963e3bad Auto merge of #102056 - b-naber:unevaluated, r=lcnr
Introduce mir::Unevaluated

Previously the distinction between unevaluated constants in the type-system and in mir was not explicit and a little confusing. Probably better to introduce its own type for that.

r? `@lcnr`
2022-09-23 13:39:11 +00:00
b-naber
a705e65605 rename Unevaluated to UnevaluatedConst 2022-09-23 14:27:34 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
41ad726110
Rollup merge of #102113 - RalfJung:opty-assert-mem, r=oli-obk
OpTy: fix a method taking self rather than &self

r? `@oli-obk`
2022-09-22 21:34:49 +02:00
b-naber
9f3784df89 introduce mir::Unevaluated 2022-09-22 12:35:28 +02:00
bors
7a8636c843 Auto merge of #100982 - fee1-dead-contrib:const-impl-requires-const-trait, r=oli-obk
Require `#[const_trait]` on `Trait` for `impl const Trait`

r? `@oli-obk`
2022-09-22 04:22:24 +00:00
Ralf Jung
0f4d7b6de8 OpTy: fix a method taking self rather than &self 2022-09-21 22:20:40 +02:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
a3396b2070 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler macro to Diagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:53 -04:00
Jhonny Bill Mena
19b348fed4 UPDATE - rename DiagnosticHandler trait to IntoDiagnostic 2022-09-21 11:39:52 -04:00
Michael Howell
b149c48186
Rollup merge of #102021 - lcnr:tyConst-fun, r=b-naber,BoxyUwU
some post-valtree cleanup

r? project-const-generics cc ```@b-naber```
2022-09-20 10:13:01 -07:00
bors
4136b59b7d Auto merge of #99806 - oli-obk:unconstrained_opaque_type, r=estebank
Allow patterns to constrain the hidden type of opaque types

fixes #96572

reverts a revert as original PR was a perf regression that was fixed by reverting it: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/99368#issuecomment-1186587864)

TODO:

* check if https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99685 is avoided
2022-09-20 12:09:52 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
8c0f8a285f
Rollup merge of #101985 - RalfJung:generate_stacktrace, r=oli-obk
interpret: expose generate_stacktrace without full InterpCx

In Miri we sometimes want to emit diagnostics without having a full `&InterpCx` available. To avoid duplicating code, this adds a way to get a stacktrace from an arbitrary slice of interpreter frames, that Miri can use with access to just a thread manager.
2022-09-19 17:55:21 +02:00
lcnr
c54c5a3c77 DestructuredConst split mir and ty 2022-09-19 17:00:38 +02:00
lcnr
526856768d ctfe, const_to_op only for mir constants 2022-09-19 16:17:33 +02:00
lcnr
647052fc04 remove the Subst trait, always use EarlyBinder 2022-09-19 11:37:27 +02:00
Ralf Jung
9fa3171015 interpret: expose generate_stacktrace without full InterpCx 2022-09-18 20:51:04 +02:00
Dylan DPC
3ad81e0dd8
Rollup merge of #93628 - est31:stabilize_let_else, r=joshtriplett
Stabilize `let else`

🎉  **Stabilizes the `let else` feature, added by [RFC 3137](https://github.com/rust-lang/rfcs/pull/3137).** 🎉

Reference PR: https://github.com/rust-lang/reference/pull/1156

closes #87335 (`let else` tracking issue)

FCP: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1029383585

----------

## Stabilization report

### Summary

The feature allows refutable patterns in `let` statements if the expression is
followed by a diverging `else`:

```Rust
fn get_count_item(s: &str) -> (u64, &str) {
    let mut it = s.split(' ');
    let (Some(count_str), Some(item)) = (it.next(), it.next()) else {
        panic!("Can't segment count item pair: '{s}'");
    };
    let Ok(count) = u64::from_str(count_str) else {
        panic!("Can't parse integer: '{count_str}'");
    };
    (count, item)
}
assert_eq!(get_count_item("3 chairs"), (3, "chairs"));
```

### Differences from the RFC / Desugaring

Outside of desugaring I'm not aware of any differences between the implementation and the RFC. The chosen desugaring has been changed from the RFC's [original](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/3137-let-else.html#reference-level-explanations). You can read a detailed discussion of the implementation history of it in `@cormacrelf` 's [summary](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1041143670) in this thread, as well as the [followup](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1046598419). Since that followup, further changes have happened to the desugaring, in #98574, #99518, #99954. The later changes were mostly about the drop order: On match, temporaries drop in the same order as they would for a `let` declaration. On mismatch, temporaries drop before the `else` block.

### Test cases

In chronological order as they were merged.

Added by df9a2e0687 (#87688):

* [`ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/pattern/usefulness/top-level-alternation.rs) to ensure the unreachable pattern lint visits patterns inside `let else`.

Added by 5b95df4bdc (#87688):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-bool-binop-init.rs) to ensure that no lazy boolean expressions (using `&&` or `||`) are allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-brace-before-else.rs) to ensure that no `}` directly preceding the `else` is allowed in the expression, as the RFC mandates.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs) to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for the `else` block.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-irrefutable.rs) to ensure that the `irrefutable_let_patterns` lint fires.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-missing-semicolon.rs) to ensure the presence of semicolons at the end of the `let` statement.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-diverging.rs) to ensure the `else` block diverges.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs) to ensure the feature works in some simple test case settings.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-scope.rs) to ensure the bindings created by the outer `let` expression are not available in the `else` block of it.

Added by bf7c32a447 (#89965):

* [`ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-89960.rs) as a regression test for the ICE-on-error bug #89960 . Later in 102b9125e1 this got removed in favour of more comprehensive tests.

Added by 856541963c (#89974):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.58.1/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-if.rs) to test for the improved error message that points out that `let else if` is not possible.

Added by 9b45713b6c:

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs) as a regression test for #89807, to ensure that `#[allow(...)]` attributes added to the entire `let` statement apply for bindings created by the `let else` pattern.

Added by 61bcd8d307 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-non-copy.rs) to ensure that a copy is performed out of non-copy wrapper types. This mirrors `if let` behaviour. The test case bases on rustc internal changes originally meant for #89933 but then removed from the PR due to the error prior to the improvements of #89841.
* [`ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-source-expr-nomove-pass.rs) to ensure that while there is a move of the binding in the successful case, the `else` case can still access the non-matching value. This mirrors `if let` behaviour.

Added by 102b9125e1 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs `](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-ref-bindings-pass.rs) to check `ref` and `ref mut` keywords in the pattern work correctly and error when needed.

Added by 2715c5f984 (#89841):

* Match ergonomic tests adapted from the `rfc2005` test suite.

Added by fec8a507a2 (#89841):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion-annotated.rs) and [`ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-deref-coercion.rs) to check deref coercions.

#### Added since this stabilization report was originally written (2022-02-09)

Added by 76ea566677 (#94211):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.63.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-destructuring.rs) to give a nice error message if an user tries to do an assignment with a (possibly refutable) pattern and an `else` block, like asked for in #93995.

Added by e7730dcb7e (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-allow-in-expr.rs) to test whether `#[allow(unused_variables)]` works in the expr, as well as its non presence, as well as putting it on the entire `let else` *affects* the expr, too. This was adding a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.
* Expansion of `ui/let-else/let-else-allow-unused.rs` and `ui/let-else/let-else-check.rs` to ensure that non-presence of `#[allow(unused)]` does issue the unused lint. This was adding a missing test case as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5bd71063b3 (#94208):

* [`ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/1.61.0/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-slicing-error.rs), a regression test for #92069, which got fixed without addition of a regression test. This resolves a missing test as pointed out by the stabilization report.

Added by 5374688e1d (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/async-await/async-await-let-else.rs) to test the interaction of async/await with `let else`

Added by 6c529ded86 (#98574):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a (partial) regression test for #98672

Added by 9b56640106 (#99518):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) as a regression test for #93951
* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #98672 (especially regarding `else` drop order)

Added by baf9a7cb57 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a partial regression test for #93951, similar to `let-else-temp-borrowck.rs`

Added by 60be2de8b7 (#99518):

* Extension of `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to include a program that can now be compiled thanks to borrow checker implications of #99518

Added by 47a7a91c96 (#100132):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-100103.rs), as a regression test for #100103, to ensure that there is no ICE when doing `Err(...)?` inside else blocks.

Added by e3c5bd617d (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-then-diverge.rs), to verify that there is no unreachable code error with the current desugaring.

Added by 981852677c (#100443):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-94176.rs), to make sure that a correct span is emitted for a missing trailing expression error. Regression test for #94176.

Added by e182d12a84 (#100434):

* [src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/unpretty/pretty-let-else.rs), as a regression test to ensure pretty printing works for `let else` (this bug surfaced in many different ways)

Added by e26285603c (#99954):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs) extended to contain & borrows as well, as this was identified as an earlier issue with the desugaring: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/98672#issuecomment-1200196921

Added by 2d8460ef43 (#99291):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-drop-order.rs) a matrix based test for various drop order behaviour of `let else`. Especially, it verifies equality of `let` and `let else` drop orders, [resolving](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1238498468) a [stabilization blocker](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523).

Added by 1b87ce0d40 (#101410):

* Edit to `src/test/ui/let-else/let-else-temporary-lifetime.rs` to add the `-Zvalidate-mir` flag, as a regression test for #99228

Added by af591ebe4d (#101410):

* [`src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs`](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/blob/master/src/test/ui/let-else/issue-99975.rs) as a regression test for the ICE #99975.

Added by this PR:

* `ui/let-else/let-else.rs`, a simple run-pass check, similar to `ui/let-else/let-else-run-pass.rs`.

### Things not currently tested

* ~~The `#[allow(...)]` tests check whether allow works, but they don't check whether the non-presence of allow causes a lint to fire.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~There is no `#[allow(...)]` test for the expression, as there are tests for the pattern and the else block.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~`let-else-brace-before-else.rs` forbids the `let ... = {} else {}` pattern and there is a rustfix to obtain `let ... = ({}) else {}`. I'm not sure whether the `.fixed` files are checked by the tooling that they compile. But if there is no such check, it would be neat to make sure that `let ... = ({}) else {}` compiles.~~ → *test added by e7730dcb7eb29a10ee73f269f4dc6e9d606db0da*
* ~~#92069 got closed as fixed, but no regression test was added. Not sure it's worth to add one.~~ → *test added by 5bd71063b3810d977aa376d1e6dd7cec359330cc*
* ~~consistency between `let else` and `if let` regarding lifetimes and drop order: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/93628#issuecomment-1055738523~~ → *test added by 2d8460ef43d902f34ba2133fe38f66ee8d2fdafc*

Edit: they are all tested now.

### Possible future work / Refutable destructuring assignments

[RFC 2909](https://rust-lang.github.io/rfcs/2909-destructuring-assignment.html) specifies destructuring assignment, allowing statements like `FooBar { a, b, c } = foo();`.
As it was stabilized, destructuring assignment only allows *irrefutable* patterns, which before the advent of `let else` were the only patterns that `let` supported.
So the combination of `let else` and destructuring assignments gives reason to think about extensions of the destructuring assignments feature that allow refutable patterns, discussed in #93995.

A naive mapping of `let else` to destructuring assignments in the form of `Some(v) = foo() else { ... };` might not be the ideal way. `let else` needs a diverging `else` clause as it introduces new bindings, while assignments have a default behaviour to fall back to if the pattern does not match, in the form of not performing the assignment. Thus, there is no good case to require divergence, or even an `else` clause at all, beyond the need for having *some* introducer syntax so that it is clear to readers that the assignment is not a given (enums and structs look similar). There are better candidates for introducer syntax however than an empty `else {}` clause, like `maybe` which could be added as a keyword on an edition boundary:

```Rust
let mut v = 0;
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v);
maybe Some(v) = foo(&v) else { bar() };
```

Further design discussion is left to an RFC, or the linked issue.
2022-09-17 15:31:06 +05:30
bors
c524c7dd25 Auto merge of #98588 - b-naber:valtrees-cleanup, r=lcnr
Use only ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system

r? `@lcnr`
2022-09-17 03:04:22 +00:00
Oli Scherer
40e2de8c41 Revert "Revert "Rollup merge of #98582 - oli-obk:unconstrained_opaque_type, r=estebank""
This reverts commit 4a742a691e.
2022-09-16 11:36:39 +00:00
Deadbeef
f8813cf10e do const trait method bounds check later in rustc_const_eval 2022-09-16 11:48:43 +08:00
est31
173eb6f407 Only enable the let_else feature on bootstrap
On later stages, the feature is already stable.

Result of running:

rg -l "feature.let_else" compiler/ src/librustdoc/ library/ | xargs sed -s -i "s#\\[feature.let_else#\\[cfg_attr\\(bootstrap, feature\\(let_else\\)#"
2022-09-15 21:06:45 +02:00
b-naber
6af8fb7936 address review again 2022-09-14 17:30:25 +02:00
Eric Holk
cf04547b0b Address code review comments 2022-09-13 14:50:12 -07:00
b-naber
29c0364c37 rebase 2022-09-13 17:48:05 +02:00
b-naber
a7735cd329 fixes/working version 2022-09-13 17:41:02 +02:00
b-naber
a4bbb8db5c use ty::Unevaluated<'tcx, ()> in type system 2022-09-13 17:40:59 +02:00
Michael Goulet
b2ed2dcaae Rename some variants 2022-09-12 16:55:59 -07:00
Michael Goulet
12ec2f0e34 Construct dyn* during const interp 2022-09-12 16:55:59 -07:00
Eric Holk
549c105bb3 dyn* through more typechecking and MIR 2022-09-12 16:55:56 -07:00
Eric Holk
6c01273a15 Plumb dyn trait representation through ty::Dynamic 2022-09-12 16:55:55 -07:00
bors
5197c96c49 Auto merge of #101483 - oli-obk:guaranteed_opt, r=fee1-dead
The `<*const T>::guaranteed_*` methods now return an option for the unknown case

cc https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/53020#issuecomment-1236932443

I chose `0` for "not equal" and `1` for "equal" and left `2` for the unknown case so backends can just forward to raw pointer equality and it works 

r? `@fee1-dead` or `@lcnr`

cc `@rust-lang/wg-const-eval`
2022-09-10 09:50:21 +00:00
Oli Scherer
f632dbe46f The <*const T>::guaranteed_* methods now return an option for the unknown case 2022-09-09 15:16:04 +00:00
bors
1120c5e01d Auto merge of #101437 - compiler-errors:erase-normalize-ordering, r=tmandry
Normalize before erasing late-bound regions in `equal_up_to_regions`

Normalize erasing regions **first**, before passing the type through a `BottomUpFolder` which erases late-bound regions too.

The root cause of this issue is due to 96d4137dee, which removes a `normalize_erasing_regions` that happens before this call to `equal_up_to_regions`. While reverting that commit might be a fix, I think it was suspicious to be erasing late-bound regions first _then_ normalizing types in the first place in `equal_up_to_regions`.

-----

I am tempted to ask the reviewer to review and `r+` this without a UI test, since the existing issues that I think this fixes are all incredibly difficult to minimize (anything hyper/warp related, given the nature of those libraries 😓) or impossible to reproduce locally (the miri test), namely:
* This recently reported issue with tokio + warp: #101430
* This issue from `@RalfJung` about Miri being broken: #101344
* This additional issue reported in a comment by `@tmandry` (issue with fuchsia + hyper): https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101344#issuecomment-1235974564

I have locally verified that the repro in #101430 is fixed with this PR, but after a couple of hours of attempting to minimize this error and either failing to actually repro the ICE, or being overwhelmed with the number of traits and functions I need to inline into a UI test, I have basically given up. Thoughts are appreciated on how best to handle this.

r? `@oli-obk` who is at the intersection of MIR and types-related stuff who may be able to give advice 😅
2022-09-08 19:01:39 +00:00
lcnr
e6660326a3 bound variables during ctfe are a bug 2022-09-08 11:41:00 +02:00
Michael Benfield
d7a750b504 Use niche-filling optimization even when multiple variants have data.
Fixes #46213
2022-09-07 20:12:45 +00:00
Michael Benfield
1a08b96a0b Change name of "dataful" variant to "untagged"
This is in anticipation of a new enum layout, in which the niche
optimization may be applied even when multiple variants have data.
2022-09-07 20:12:45 +00:00
Oli Scherer
104f97e5aa Move CTFE handling of nondiverging intrinsics to intrinsics.rs 2022-09-06 14:18:32 +00:00
Oli Scherer
b7413511dc Generalize the Assume intrinsic statement to a general Intrinsic statement 2022-09-06 14:18:32 +00:00
Oli Scherer
3f07645120 Lower the assume intrinsic to a MIR statement 2022-09-06 14:18:32 +00:00
Yuki Okushi
957b44a13c
Rollup merge of #101402 - saethlin:inline-asm-hook, r=oli-obk
Add a Machine hook for inline assembly

I'm sketching out some support in Miri to "execute" inline assembly. I want this because there are codebases which have very simple inline assembly like hand-written syscall wrappers, and it would be nice to test such code without modification.

r? ``@oli-obk``
2022-09-06 08:36:04 +09:00
Michael Goulet
76b494a9dd Normalize before erasing late-bound regions in equal_up_to_regions 2022-09-05 06:44:33 +00:00
Deadbeef
075084f772 Make const_eval_select a real intrinsic 2022-09-04 20:35:23 +08:00
Ben Kimock
563a75b6e3 Add a Machine hook for inline assembly 2022-09-03 18:05:02 -04:00
bors
06b72b06a2 Auto merge of #101154 - RalfJung:validation-perf, r=oli-obk
interpret: fix unnecessary allocation in validation visitor

Should fix the perf regression introduced by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100043.

r? `@oli-obk`
2022-09-03 09:20:54 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
938897e2e4
Rollup merge of #100121 - Nilstrieb:mir-validator-param-env, r=oli-obk
Try normalizing types without RevealAll in ParamEnv in MIR validation

Before, the MIR validator used RevealAll in its ParamEnv for type
checking. This could cause false negatives in some cases due to
RevealAll ParamEnvs not always use all predicates as expected here.

Since some MIR passes like inlining use RevealAll as well, keep using
it in the MIR validator too, but when it fails usign RevealAll, also
try the check without it, to stop false negatives.

Fixes #99866

cc ````````@compiler-errors```````` who nicely helped me on zulip
2022-09-02 18:21:58 +02:00
Oli Scherer
1fc9ef1edd tracing::instrument cleanup 2022-09-01 14:54:27 +00:00
Oli Scherer
d3b22c7267 Directly use the instrument macro instead of its full path 2022-09-01 14:53:46 +00:00
bors
b32223fec1 Auto merge of #100707 - dzvon:fix-typo, r=davidtwco
Fix a bunch of typo

This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].

I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in
the comments.

[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
2022-09-01 05:39:58 +00:00
Ralf Jung
d814d10069 interpret: use new OpTy::len for Len rvalue
This avoids a `force_allocation`
2022-08-31 15:22:44 +02:00
Dezhi Wu
b1430fb7ca Fix a bunch of typo
This PR will fix some typos detected by [typos].

I only picked the ones I was sure were spelling errors to fix, mostly in
the comments.

[typos]: https://github.com/crate-ci/typos
2022-08-31 18:24:55 +08:00
bors
f07d6e8c0a Auto merge of #99102 - JakobDegen:reorder-generators, r=oli-obk
Rework definition of MIR phases to more closely reflect semantic concerns

Implements most of rust-lang/compiler-team#522 .

I tried my best to restrict this PR to the "core" parts of the MCP. In other words, this includes just enough changes to make the new definition of `MirPhase` make sense. That means there are a couple of FIXMEs lying around. Depending on what reviewers prefer, I can either fix them in this PR or send follow up PRs. There are also a couple other refactorings of the `rustc_mir_transform/src/lib.rs` file that I want to do in follow ups that I didn't leave explicit FIXMEs for.
2022-08-30 23:43:33 +00:00
Jakob Degen
aad14c701e Refactor MIR phases 2022-08-30 01:40:14 -07:00
bors
0631ea5d73 Auto merge of #101183 - Dylan-DPC:rollup-6kewixv, r=Dylan-DPC
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #95376 (Add `vec::Drain{,Filter}::keep_rest`)
 - #100092 (Fall back when relating two opaques by substs in MIR typeck)
 - #101019 (Suggest returning closure as `impl Fn`)
 - #101022 (Erase late bound regions before comparing types in `suggest_dereferences`)
 - #101101 (interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information)
 - #101123 (Remove `register_attr` feature)
 - #101175 (Don't --bless in pre-push hook)
 - #101176 (rustdoc: remove unused CSS selectors for `.table-display`)
 - #101180 (Add another MaybeUninit array test with const)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-30 08:29:42 +00:00
Dylan DPC
81f3841cfb
Rollup merge of #101101 - RalfJung:read-pointer-as-bytes, r=oli-obk
interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes a CTFE-only error with extra information

Next step in the reaction to https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/99923. Also teaches Miri to implicitly strip provenance in more situations when transmuting pointers to integers, which fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/miri/issues/2456.

Pointer-to-int transmutation during CTFE now produces a message like this:
```
   = help: this code performed an operation that depends on the underlying bytes representing a pointer
   = help: the absolute address of a pointer is not known at compile-time, so such operations are not supported
```

r? ``@oli-obk``
2022-08-30 11:26:51 +05:30
bors
a0d07093f8 Auto merge of #100812 - Nilstrieb:revert-let-chains-nightly, r=Mark-Simulacrum
Revert let_chains stabilization

This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.

Bumps the stage0 compiler which already has it reverted.
2022-08-30 05:48:22 +00:00
bors
9f4d5d2a28 Auto merge of #101167 - matthiaskrgr:rollup-yt3jdmp, r=matthiaskrgr
Rollup of 7 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #100898 (Do not report too many expr field candidates)
 - #101056 (Add the syntax of references to their documentation summary.)
 - #101106 (Rustdoc-Json: Retain Stripped Modules when they are imported, not when they have items)
 - #101131 (CTFE: exposing pointers and calling extern fn is just impossible)
 - #101141 (Simplify `get_trait_ref` fn used for `virtual_function_elimination`)
 - #101146 (Various changes to logging of borrowck-related code)
 - #101156 (Remove `Sync` requirement from lint pass objects)

Failed merges:

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-29 22:49:04 +00:00
Matthias Krüger
cd53b4dba5
Rollup merge of #101131 - RalfJung:ctfe-no-needs-rfc, r=oli-obk
CTFE: exposing pointers and calling extern fn is just impossible

The remaining "needs RFC" errors are just needlessly confusing, I think -- time to get rid of that error variant. They are anyway only reachable with miri-unleashed (if at all).

r? `@oli-obk`
2022-08-29 21:12:57 +02:00
Nilstrieb
d1ef8180f9 Revert let_chains stabilization
This reverts commit 3266460749.

This is the revert against master, the beta revert was already done in #100538.
2022-08-29 19:34:11 +02:00
Nilstrieb
96d4137dee Only normalize once in mir validator typechecker
Before, it called `normalize_erasing_regions` twice since
`equal_up_to_regions` called it as well for both types.
2022-08-29 16:29:53 +02:00
Nilstrieb
81a583c21e Try normalizing types without RevealAll in ParamEnv in mir validation
Before, the MIR validator used RevealAll in its ParamEnv for type
checking. This could cause false negatives in some cases due to
RevealAll ParamEnvs not always use all predicates as expected here.

Since some MIR passes like inlining use RevealAll as well, keep using
it in the MIR validator too, but when it fails usign RevealAll, also
try the check without it, to stop false negatives.
2022-08-29 16:27:52 +02:00
Ralf Jung
8b53abd602 interpret: fix unnecessary allocation in validation visitor 2022-08-29 08:05:20 -04:00
Dylan DPC
3ea5456366
Rollup merge of #100239 - RalfJung:const-prop-uninit, r=oli-obk
remove an ineffective check in const_prop

Based on https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100043, only the last two commits are new.

ConstProp has a special check when reading from a local that prevents reading uninit locals. However, if that local flows into `force_allocation`, then no check fires and evaluation proceeds. So this check is not really effective at preventing accesses to uninit locals.

With https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100043, `read_immediate` and friends always fail when reading uninit locals, so I don't see why ConstProp would need a separate check. Thus I propose we remove it. This is needed to be able to do https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/100085.
2022-08-29 16:49:40 +05:30
Matthias Krüger
d814fdd3f9
Rollup merge of #100897 - RalfJung:const-not-to-mutable, r=lcnr
extra sanity check against consts pointing to mutable memory

This should be both unreachable and redundant (since we already ensure that validation only reads from read-only memory, when validating consts), but I feel like we cannot be paranoid enough here, and also if this ever fails it'll be a nicer error than the "cannot read from mutable memory" error.
2022-08-29 06:34:46 +02:00
Matthias Krüger
d182081de1
Rollup merge of #99027 - tmiasko:basic-blocks, r=oli-obk
Replace `Body::basic_blocks()` with field access

Since the refactoring in #98930, it is possible to borrow the basic blocks
independently from other parts of MIR by accessing the `basic_blocks` field
directly.

Replace unnecessary `Body::basic_blocks()` method with a direct field access,
which has an additional benefit of borrowing the basic blocks only.
2022-08-29 06:34:43 +02:00
Ralf Jung
f29c3c421b entirely get rid of NeedsRfc CTFE errors 2022-08-28 13:40:24 -04:00
Ralf Jung
a9f9145b09 CTFE: exposing pointers and calling extern fn doesn't need an RFC, it is just impossible 2022-08-28 13:32:48 -04:00
Ralf Jung
1a1220c5e4 validation should only catch UB errors 2022-08-28 11:49:32 -04:00
Matthias Krüger
5b8081490f
Rollup merge of #101038 - RalfJung:interning-alignment, r=oli-obk
no alignment check during interning

This should fix https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/101034
r? `@oli-obk`

Unfortunately we don't have a self-contained testcase for this problem. I am not sure how it can be triggered...
2022-08-28 09:35:19 +02:00
Ralf Jung
2e172473da interpret: make read-pointer-as-bytes *always* work in Miri
and show some extra information when it happens in CTFE
2022-08-27 18:37:44 -04:00
Ralf Jung
e63a625711 interpret: rename relocation → provenance 2022-08-27 14:11:19 -04:00
bors
332cc8fb75 Auto merge of #100999 - nnethercote:shrink-FnAbi, r=bjorn3
Shrink `FnAbi`

Because they can take up a lot of memory in debug and release builds.

r? `@bjorn3`
2022-08-27 14:00:53 +00:00
Ralf Jung
aff9841507 remove a now-useless machine hook 2022-08-27 08:53:04 -04:00
Ralf Jung
4173e971b8 remove an ineffective check in const_prop 2022-08-27 08:53:04 -04:00
bors
bb8a08f011 Auto merge of #101064 - compiler-errors:rollup-fwm5m5f, r=compiler-errors
Rollup of 9 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #100724 (Migrate ast lowering to session diagnostic)
 - #100735 (Migrate `rustc_ty_utils` to `SessionDiagnostic`)
 - #100738 (Diagnostics migr const eval)
 - #100744 (Migrate rustc_mir_dataflow to diagnostic structs)
 - #100776 (Migrate `rustc_lint` errors to `SessionDiagnostic`)
 - #100817 (sugg: suggest the usage of boolean value when there is a typo in the keyword)
 - #100836 (Migrate `rustc_attr` crate diagnostics)
 - #100890 (Migrate rustc_driver to SessionDiagnostic)
 - #100900 (on `region_errors.rs`)

Failed merges:

 - #100831 (Migrate `symbol_mangling` module to new diagnostics structs)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
2022-08-27 00:38:06 +00:00
Michael Goulet
b54344401a
Rollup merge of #100738 - nidnogg:diagnostics_migr_const_eval, r=davidtwco
Diagnostics migr const eval

This PR should eventually contain all diagnostic migrations for the `rustc_const_eval` crate.

r? `@davidtwco`
`@rustbot` label +A-translation
2022-08-26 15:56:23 -07:00
Ralf Jung
30fa931f92 make read_immediate error immediately on uninit, so ImmTy can carry initialized Scalar 2022-08-26 13:20:57 -04:00
Ralf Jung
2e52fe01cf remove some now-unnecessary parameters from check_bytes 2022-08-26 13:20:56 -04:00
Ralf Jung
da13935ecc remove enforce_number_init machine hook that Miri no longer needs 2022-08-26 13:20:56 -04:00
Ralf Jung
9d604f301b fix an outdated machine hook name 2022-08-26 13:20:56 -04:00
Tomasz Miąsko
b48870b451 Replace Body::basic_blocks() with field access 2022-08-26 14:27:08 +02:00
Ralf Jung
b85178a5fc no alignment check during interning 2022-08-26 08:15:29 -04:00
Nicholas Nethercote
f974617bda Move ArgAbi::pad_i32 into PassMode::Cast.
Because it's only needed for that variant. This shrinks the types and
clarifies the logic.
2022-08-26 11:12:36 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
b853e8a619 Turn ArgAbi::pad into a bool.
Because it's only ever set to `None` or `Some(Reg::i32())`.
2022-08-26 10:53:41 +10:00
Nicholas Nethercote
e4bf113027 Box CastTarget within PassMode.
Because `PassMode::Cast` is by far the largest variant, but is
relatively rare.

This requires making `PassMode` not impl `Copy`, and `Clone` is no
longer necessary. This causes lots of sigil adjusting, but nothing very
notable.
2022-08-26 09:35:28 +10:00
bors
4d45b0745a Auto merge of #100571 - cjgillot:mir-cost-visit, r=compiler-errors
Check projection types before inlining MIR

Fixes https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/100550

I'm very unhappy with this solution, having to duplicate MIR validation code, but at least it removes the ICE.

r? `@compiler-errors`
2022-08-25 08:16:43 +00:00
Ralf Jung
cb4cd73664 extra sanity check against consts pointing to mutable memory 2022-08-23 08:12:37 -04:00
nidnogg
066796cece Addressing tidy check fail 2022-08-22 12:32:42 -03:00
nidnogg
649749c7b0 Addressing last comment on PR review 2022-08-22 12:14:49 -03:00
nidnogg
13abae2deb Switched errors to diags according to latest PRs 2022-08-22 00:02:36 -03:00