Implementation of repr struct alignment RFC 1358.
The main changes around rustc::ty::Layout::struct:
* Added abi_align field which stores abi alignment before repr align is applied
* align field contains transitive repr alignment
* Added padding vec which stores padding required after fields
The main user of this information is rustc_trans::adt::struct_llfields
which determines the LLVM fields to be used by LLVM, including padding
fields.
A possible future optimisation would be to put the padding Vec in an Option, since it will be unused unless you are using repr align.
When a span starts on a line with nothing but whitespace to the left,
and there are no other annotations in that line, simplify the visual
representation of the span.
Go from:
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `A` has infinite size
--> file2.rs:1:1
|
1 | struct A {
| _^ starting here...
2 | | a: A,
3 | | }
| |_^ ...ending here: recursive type has infinite size
|
```
To:
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `A` has infinite size
--> file2.rs:1:1
|
1 | / struct A {
2 | | a: A,
3 | | }
| |_^ recursive type has infinite size
```
Remove `starting here...`/`...ending here` labels from all multiline
diagnostics.
The main changes around rustc::ty::Layout::struct and rustc_trans:adt:
* Added primitive_align field which stores alignment before repr align
* Always emit field padding when generating the LLVM struct fields
* Added methods for adjusting field indexes from the layout index to the
LLVM struct field index
The main user of this information is rustc_trans::adt::struct_llfields
which determines the LLVM fields to be used by LLVM, including padding
fields.
Add a way to get shorter spans until `char` for pointing at defs
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `X` has infinite size
--> file.rs:10:1
|
10 | struct X {
| ^^^^^^^^ recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `X` representable
```
vs
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `X` has infinite size
--> file.rs:10:1
|
10 | struct X {
| _^ starting here...
11 | | x: X,
12 | | }
| |_^ ...ending here: recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `X` representable
```
Re: #35965, #38246. Follow up to #38328.
r? @jonathandturner
Highlight and simplify mismatched types
Shorten mismatched types errors by replacing subtypes that are not
different with `_`, and highlighting only the subtypes that are
different.
Given a file
```rust
struct X<T1, T2> {
x: T1,
y: T2,
}
fn foo() -> X<X<String, String>, String> {
X { x: X {x: "".to_string(), y: 2}, y: "".to_string()}
}
fn bar() -> Option<String> {
"".to_string()
}
```
provide the following output
```rust
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:6:5
|
6 | X { x: X {x: "".to_string(), y: 2}, y: "".to_string()}
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `std::string::String`, found {integer}
|
= note: expected type `X<X<_, std::string::String>, _>`
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ // < highlighted
found type `X<X<_, {integer}>, _>`
^^^^^^^^^ // < highlighted
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> file.rs:6:5
|
10 | "".to_string()
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ expected struct `std::option::Option`, found `std::string::String`
|
= note: expected type `Option<std::string::String>`
^^^^^^^ ^ // < highlighted
found type `std::string::String`
```
Fix#21025. Re: #40186. Follow up to #39906.
I'm looking to change how this output is accomplished so that it doesn't create list of strings to pass around, but rather add an elided `Ty` placeholder, and use the same string formatting for normal types. I'll be doing that soonish.
r? @nikomatsakis
Use proper span for tuple index parsed as float
Fix diagnostic suggestion from:
```rust
help: try parenthesizing the first index
| (1, (2, 3)).((1, (2, 3)).1).1;
```
to the correct:
```rust
help: try parenthesizing the first index
| ((1, (2, 3)).1).1;
```
Fix#41081.
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `X` has infinite size
--> file.rs:10:1
|
10 | struct X {
| ^^^^^^^^ recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `X` representable
```
vs
```rust
error[E0072]: recursive type `X` has infinite size
--> file.rs:10:1
|
10 | struct X {
| _^ starting here...
11 | | x: X,
12 | | }
| |_^ ...ending here: recursive type has infinite size
|
= help: insert indirection (e.g., a `Box`, `Rc`, or `&`) at some point to make `X` representable
```
Point at only one char on `Span::next_point`
Avoid pointing at two chars so the diagnostic output doesn't display a
multiline span when starting beyond a line end.
Fix#41155.
Instead of
```rust
error: expected one of `(`, `const`, `default`, `extern`, `fn`, `type`, or `unsafe`, found `}`
--> <anon>:3:1
|
1 | impl S { pub
| _____________- starting here...
2 | |
| | ...ending here: expected one of 7 possible tokens here
3 | }
| ^ unexpected token
```
show
```rust
error: expected one of `(`, `const`, `default`, `extern`, `fn`, `type`, or `unsafe`, found `}`
--> <anon>:13:1
|
12 | pub
| - expected one of 7 possible tokens here
13 | }
| ^ unexpected token
```
Explicit help message for binop type mismatch
When trying to do `1 + Some(2)`, or some other binary operation on two
types different types without an appropriate trait implementation, provide
an explicit help message:
```rust
help: `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>` has no implementation
```
Re: #39579, #38564, #37626, #39942, #34698.
When trying to do a binary operation with missing implementation, for
example `1 + Some(2)`, provide an explicit help message:
```
note: no implementation for `{integer} + std::option::Option<{integer}>`
```
Use `rustc_on_unimplemented` for the suggestions. Move cfail test to ui.
don't try to blame tuple fields for immutability
Tuple fields don't have an `&T` in their declaration that can be changed
to `&mut T` - skip them..
Fixes#41104.
r? @nikomatsakis
Make 'overlapping_inherent_impls' lint a hard error
This is ought to be implemented in PR #40728. Unfortunately, when I rebased the PR to resolve merge conflict, the "hard error" code disappeared. This PR complements the initial PR.
Now the following rust code gives the following error:
```rust
struct Foo;
impl Foo {
fn id() {}
}
impl Foo {
fn id() {}
}
fn main() {}
```
```
error[E0592]: duplicate definitions with name `id`
--> /home/topecongiro/test.rs:4:5
|
4 | fn id() {}
| ^^^^^^^^^^ duplicate definitions for `id`
...
8 | fn id() {}
| ---------- other definition for `id`
error: aborting due to previous error
```
Fix diagnostic suggestion from:
```rust
help: try parenthesizing the first index
| (1, (2, 3)).((1, (2, 3)).1).1;
```
to the correct:
```rust
help: try parenthesizing the first index
| ((1, (2, 3)).1).1;
```
Do not recommend private fields called as method
```rust
error: no method named `dog_age` found for type `animal::Dog` in the current scope
--> $DIR/private-field.rs:26:23
|
26 | let dog_age = dog.dog_age();
| ^^^^^^^ private field, not a method
```
Fix#27654.
Add a `TyErr` type to represent unknown types in places where
parse errors have happened, while still able to build the AST.
Initially only used to represent incorrectly written fn arguments and
avoid "expected X parameters, found Y" errors when called with the
appropriate amount of parameters. We cannot use `TyInfer` for this as
`_` is not allowed as a valid argument type.
Example output:
```rust
error: expected one of `:` or `@`, found `,`
--> file.rs:12:9
|
12 | fn bar(x, y: usize) {}
| ^
error[E0061]: this function takes 2 parameters but 3 parameters were supplied
--> file.rs:19:9
|
12 | fn bar(x, y) {}
| --------------- defined here
...
19 | bar(1, 2, 3);
| ^^^^^^^ expected 2 parameters
```
For the most part, the current code performs similarly, although it
differs in some particulars. I'll be nice to have these tests for
judging future changes, as well.
First, we keep a `CoerceMany` now to find the LUB of all the break
expressions. Second, this `CoerceMany` is actually an
`Option<CoerceMany>`, and we store `None` for loops where "break with an
expression" is disallowed. This avoids silly duplicate errors about a
type mismatch, since the loops pass already reports an error that the
break cannot have an expression. Finally, since we now detect an invalid
break target during HIR lowering, refactor `find_loop` to be infallible.
Adjust tests as needed:
- some spans from breaks are slightly different
- break up a single loop into multiple since `CoerceMany` silences
redundant and derived errors
- add a ui test that we only give on error for loop-break-value
macros: improve `Span`'s expansion information
This PR improves `Span`'s expansion information. More specifically:
- It refactors AST node span construction to preserve expansion information.
- Today, we only use the underlying tokens' `BytePos`s, throwing away the `ExpnId`s.
- This improves the accuracy of AST nodes' expansion information, fixing #30506.
- It refactors `span.expn_id: ExpnId` to `span.ctxt: SyntaxContext` and removes `ExpnId`.
- This gives all tokens as much hygiene information as `Ident`s.
- This is groundwork for procedural macros 2.0 `TokenStream` API.
- This is also groundwork for declarative macros 2.0, which will need this hygiene information for some non-`Ident` tokens.
- It simplifies processing of spans' expansion information throughout the compiler.
- It fixes#40649.
- It fixes#39450 and fixes part of #23480.
r? @nrc
Clarify suggetion for field used as method
Instead of
```rust
error: no method named `src_addr` found for type `&wire::ipv4::Repr` in the current scope
--> src/wire/ipv4.rs:409:34
|
409 | packet.set_src_addr(self.src_addr());
| ^^^^^^^^
|
note: did you mean to write `self.src_addr`?
--> src/wire/ipv4.rs:409:34
|
409 | packet.set_src_addr(self.src_addr());
| ^^^^^^^^
```
present
```rust
error: no method named `src_addr` found for type `&wire::ipv4::Repr` in the current scope
--> src/wire/ipv4.rs:409:34
|
409 | packet.set_src_addr(self.src_addr());
| ^^^^^^^^ field, not a method
|
= help: did you mean to write `self.src_addr` instead of `self.src_addr(...)`?
```
Fix#38321.
This converts all of borrowck's `mut` suggestions to a new
`mc::ImmutabilityBlame` API instead of the current mix of various hacks.
Fixes#35937.
Fixes#40823.
* Point at where the token was expected instead of the last token
successfuly parsed.
* Only show `unexpected token` if the next char and the unexpected token
don't have the same span.
* Change some cfail and pfail tests to ui test.
* Don't show all possible tokens in span label if they are more than 6.
