This commit deals with the fallout of the previous change by making tuples
structs have public fields where necessary (now that the fields are private by
default).
This is a continuation of the work done in #13184 to make struct fields private
by default. This commit finishes RFC 4 by making all tuple structs have private
fields by default. Note that enum variants are not affected.
A tuple struct having a private field means that it cannot be matched on in a
pattern match (both refutable and irrefutable), and it also cannot have a value
specified to be constructed. Similarly to private fields, switching the type of
a private field in a tuple struct should be able to be done in a backwards
compatible way.
The one snag that I ran into which wasn't mentioned in the RFC is that this
commit also forbids taking the value of a tuple struct constructor. For example,
this code now fails to compile:
mod a {
pub struct A(int);
}
let a: fn(int) -> a::A = a::A; //~ ERROR: first field is private
Although no fields are bound in this example, it exposes implementation details
through the type itself. For this reason, taking the value of a struct
constructor with private fields is forbidden (outside the containing module).
RFC: 0004-private-fields
This commit switches privacy's checking of fields to have *all* fields be
private by default. This does not yet change tuple structs, this only affects
structs with named fields. The fallout of this change will follow shortly.
RFC: 0004-private-fields
cc #8122Closes#11809
`collections::list::List` was decided in a [team meeting](https://github.com/mozilla/rust/wiki/Meeting-weekly-2014-03-25) that it was unnecessary, so this PR removes it. Additionally, it removes an old and redundant purity test and fixes some warnings.
Only supports crate level statics. No debug info is generated for function level statics. Closes#9227.
As discussed at the end of the comments for #9227, I took an initial stab at adding support for function level statics and decided it would be enough work to warrant being split into a separate issue.
See #13144 for the new issue describing the need to add support for function level static variables.
r? @nikomatsakis
Fix#13140
Includes two fixes, and a semi-thorough regression test.
(There is another set of tests that I linked from #5121, but those are sort of all over the place, while the ones I've included here are more directly focused on the issues at hand.)
Summary:
So far, we've used the term POD "Plain Old Data" to refer to types that
can be safely copied. However, this term is not consistent with the
other built-in bounds that use verbs instead. This patch renames the Pod
kind into Copy.
RFC: 0003-opt-in-builtin-traits
Test Plan: make check
Reviewers: cmr
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.octayn.net/D3
This commit removes implicitly adding the Send bound to ~Trait objects and
procedure types. It will now be manually required to specify that a procedure
or trait must be send-able.
Closes#10296
The `_match.rs` takes advantage of passes prior to `trans` and
aggressively prunes the sub-match tree based on exact equality. When it
comes to literal or range, the strategy may lead to wrong result if
there's guard function or multiple patterns inside tuple.
Closes#12582.
Closes#13027.
This change prepares `rustc` to accept private fields by default. These changes will have to go through a snapshot before the rest of the changes can happen.
This change is in preparation for #8122. Nothing is currently done with these
visibility qualifiers, they are just parsed and accepted by the compiler.
RFC: 0004-private-fields
The problem was that we need to apply the substitution, so that the
formal lifetime parameters get replaced with (unifiable)
free-lifetimes that can actually be fed into the constraint solver.
Also, refactor code os that substitution for `check_item` and
`check_method`, moving both down the control flow into `check_bare_fn`.
----
Finally, there was another (similar) spot where we needed to
substitute early-bound lifetimes when invoking an object method of a
trait.
It was possible to borrow unsafe static items in static initializers.
This patch implements a small `Visitor` that walks static initializer's
expressions and checks borrows aliasability.
Fixes#13005
cc @nikomatsakis r?
Summary:
It was possible to borrow unsafe static items in static initializers.
This patch implements a small `Visitor` that walks static initializer's
expressions and checks borrows aliasability.
Fixes#13005
Test Plan: make check
Differential Revision: http://phabricator.octayn.net/D2
This needs to be removed as part of removing `~[T]`. Partial type hints
are now allowed, and will remove the need to add a version of this
method for `Vec<T>`. For now, this involves a few workarounds for
partial type hints not completely working.
