7010: Update ungrammar for const block patterns r=matklad a=Veykril
Fixes#6848
Adds const blocks and const block patterns to the AST and parses them.
Blocked on https://github.com/rust-analyzer/ungrammar/pull/17/, will merge that PR there once this one gets the OK so I can remove the local ungrammar dependency path and fix the Cargo.lock.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
Avoid mutation of snapshot's config -- that's spooky action at a
distance. Instead, copy it over to a local variable.
This points out a minor architecture problem, which we won't fix right
away.
Various `ide`-level config structs, like `AssistConfig`, are geared
towards one-shot use when calling a specific methods. On the other
hand, the large `Config` struct in `rust-analyzer` is a long-term
config store.
The fact that `Config` stores `AssistConfig` is accidental -- a better
design would probably be to just store `ConfigData` inside `Config`
and create various `Config`s on the fly out of it.
6960: Show enum variant on Self qualified paths r=matklad a=Veykril
Fixes first part of #6549Fixes#6550
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
7000: Store invocation site for eager macros r=edwin0cheng a=jonas-schievink
Fixes https://github.com/rust-analyzer/rust-analyzer/issues/6992
r? @edwin0cheng
I'm not sure if this is totally correct, it looks like we create **two** `EagerCallLoc`s per macro invocation, one for the arguments (?), and one for the actual macro call. I gave both the same `AstId`, hopefully that's correct.
Co-authored-by: Jonas Schievink <jonasschievink@gmail.com>
6964: Add full pattern completions for Struct and Variant patterns r=matklad a=Veykril
Just gonna call it full pattern completion as pattern completion is already implemented in a sense by showing idents in pattern position. What this does is basically complete struct and variant patterns where applicable(function params, let statements and refutable pattern locations).
This does not replace just completing the corresponding idents of the structs and variants, instead two completions are shown for these, a completion for the ident itself and a completion for the pattern(if the pattern make sense to be used that is). I figured in some cases one would rather type out the pattern manually if it has a lot of fields but you only care about one since this completion would cause one more work in the end since you would have to delete all the extra matched fields again.
These completions are tagged as `CompletionKind::Snippet`, not sure if that is the right one here.
<details>
<summary>some gifs</summary>
</details>
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
* simplify code
* correctly handle crate roots and mod.rs files (nested inline modules
are still mishandled)
* make sure that new text contains a trailing newline
6993: Clean up descriptions for settings r=matklad a=rherrmann
Use two consecutive newlines (`\n\n`) to actually continue text on a
new line.
Use proper markup to reference related settings.
Consistently format references to files, command line arguments, etc.
as `code`. Format mentions of UI elements in _italic_.
Fix typos, add missing full-stops, add missing default values.
Co-authored-by: Rüdiger Herrmann <ruediger.herrmann@gmx.de>
Use two consecutive newlines (`\n\n`) to actually continue text on a
new line.
Use proper markup to reference related settings.
Consistently format references to files, editor commands, command line
arguments, files, etc. as `code`.
Fix typos, add missing full-stops, add missing default values.
6982: Remove parentheses when inverting `!(cond)` r=matklad a=Jesse-Bakker
Followup to #6894
When inverting a composite condition twice, the parentheses were left. This also removes those unnecessary parentheses when applying the invert-if assist.
Co-authored-by: Jesse Bakker <github@jessebakker.com>
6921: Higher-ranked trait bounds for where clauses r=flodiebold a=Veykril
There is a slight problem with this which is also noted in a FIXME now but `LifetimeParameters` of these ForLifetime where clauses allocate the lifetimes in the corresponding arena as if they were lifetimes of the item itself and not just the clause they belong to. I wasn't entirely sure what I could do about this but given nothing really uses lifetimes like that currently I figured it might be fine? Open to suggestions for that problem.
Co-authored-by: Lukas Wirth <lukastw97@gmail.com>
